|
http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol19/41/
doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.41
| |
|
| Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.
| Abstract
Economic and sociological theories of marriage have long emphasized the impact of women’s education and employment on union formation. In this study, we explore the relevance of the female economic independence hypothesis to explain women’s patterns of entry into marriage and cohabitation in Portugal and Spain. In these two Southern European countries, gender equity has improved remarkably in the public sphere, but family relations remain structured along traditional gender roles. We focus on three indicators of women’s autonomy: educational attainment, employment status and having lived independently from the family of origin. The analysis is based on the Fertility and Family Surveys and discrete-time multinomial logistic regression models are used to estimate the odds of marrying, cohabiting or remaining single. The results suggest that whereas the effect of female education is consistent with the independence hypothesis, women’s labour force participation encourages union formation, particularly among younger cohorts. Living independently from the family of origin reduces the likelihood of entering marriage but increases considerably the odds of cohabiting. Author's affiliation
Marta Domínguez-Folgueras
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
Teresa Castro-Martin
CSIC (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas), Spain Keywords
cohabitation, education, employment, independence hypothesis, marriage, Portugal, South Europe, Spain, union formation, women’s status Word count (Main text)
6912 Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
 |
[22-2] Ethnic differences in transition to first marriage in Iran: The role of marriage market, women’s socio-economic status, and process of development (marriage, education) |
|
[21-8] Is Poland really 'immune' to the spread of cohabitation? (union formation, cohabitation) |
|
[21-7] "Living Apart Together" relationships in the United States (marriage, cohabitation) |
|
[20-13] Dispensing with marriage: Marital and partnership trends in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 2000-2006 (marriage, cohabitation) |
|
[20-10] Active-duty military service, cohabiting unions, and the transition to marriage (marriage, cohabitation) |
[ Back to previous page ]
|
