|
http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol19/46/
doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.46
| |
|
| Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.
| Abstract Almost all commonly used indirect fertility estimation methods rely on the P/F ratio. As originally conceived, the ratio compares cumulated cohort fertility with cumulated period fertility on the basis of three, fairly strong, assumptions. The intention of this paper is to interrogate what happens to the results produced by the P/F ratio method as each of these three assumptions is violated, first independently, and then concurrently. These investigations are important given the generally poor quality of census data collected in developing countries, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, and the radically altering demographic conditions associated with a generalised HIV/AIDS epidemic in the region. Author's affiliation Tom A. Moultrie University of Cape Town, South Africa Rob Dorrington University of Cape Town, South Africa Keywords AIDS/HIV, developing countries, estimation, fertility, indirect techniques Word count (Main text) 6228 Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)
Similar articles in Demographic Research
[ Back to previous page ]
|