Karsten Hank
Hans-Peter Kohler

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol2/1/

doi:10.4054/DemRes.2000.2.1

	Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file. Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.
	Click the icon to view the HTML version of this article. It will be displayed in a new window.

Abstract
Gender preferences may have substantial implications for a couple’s fertility behavior. However, there is only limited empirical research investigating this subject in modern Western societies. In this paper, data from the Fertility and Family Surveys are used to compare 17 European countries with respect to their gender preferences for children. Despite substantial regional heterogeneity across Europe, our results show a strong tendency towards a preference for a mixed sex composition (if there is any preference at all). However, we found some unexpected indication for a girl preference in the Czech Republic, Lithuania, and Portugal. Because socioeconomic conditions and family policies, which are important factors in explaining different fertility levels, are not related to a specific gender of children, we argue that cultural factors are of major importance for different gender preferences.

Author's affiliation
Karsten Hank
University of Mannheim, Germany
Hans-Peter Kohler
University of Pennsylvania, United States of America

Keywords
crossnational analysis, fertility, gender preferences

Word count (Main text)
3136

Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)

	[17-6] Understanding parental gender preferences in advanced societies: Lessons from Sweden and Finland
	[9-12] A summary of Special Collection 1: Social Interactions and HIV/AIDS in Rural Africa
	[7-15] The geographic context of male nuptiality in western Germany during the 1980s and 1990s
	[6-14] The Fertility Pattern of Twins and the General Population Compared: Evidence from Danish Cohorts 1945-64
	[6-7] Tempo-Adjusted Period Parity Progression Measures: Assessing the Implications of Delayed Childbearing for Cohort Fertility in Sweden, the Netherlands and Spain
	[6-6] Tempo-Adjusted Period Parity Progression Measures, Fertility Postponement and Completed Cohort Fertility
	[5-4] Attrition in Longitudinal Household Survey Data: Some Tests for Three Developing-Country Samples
	[4-4] Changes in Swedish Women’s Individual Activity Status and the Subsequent Risk of Giving Birth in the 1980s and 1990s: An Extension of Studies by Gunnar Andersson and Britta Hoem
	[3-8] Frailty Modelling for Adult and Old Age Mortality: The Application of a Modified DeMoivre Hazard Function to Sex Differentials in Mortality
	[3-7] Empirical Assessments of Social Networks, Fertility and Family Planning Programs: Nonlinearities and their Implications
	[S1-1] Introduction to "Research on Demographic Aspects of HIV/AIDS in Rural Africa"
	[S1-13] Talking about AIDS: The influence of communication networks on individual risk perceptions of HIV/AIDS infection and favored protective behaviors in South Nyanza District, Kenya

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

	[19-62] Union formation and fertility in Bulgaria and Russia: A life table description of recent trends (fertility)
	[19-58] Postponement and childlessness - Evidence from two British cohorts (fertility)
	[19-55] Beyond denomination: The relationship between religion and family planning in rural Malawi (fertility)
	[19-46] Sources of error and bias in methods of fertility estimation contingent on the P/F ratio in a time of declining fertility and rising mortality (fertility)
	[19-33] Fertility of Turkish and Moroccan women in the Netherlands: Adjustment to native level within one generation (fertility)

[ Back to previous page ]