|
http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol20/6/
doi:10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.6
| |
|
| Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.
| Abstract In the absence of HIV testing, how do rural Malawians assess their HIV status? In this paper, we use a unique dataset that includes respondents’ HIV status as well as their subjective likelihood of HIV infection. These data show that many rural Malawians overestimate their likelihood of current HIV infection. The discrepancy between actual and perceived status raises an important question: Why are so many wrong? We begin by identifying determinants of self-assessed HIV status, and then compare these assessments with HIV biomarker results. Finally, we ask what characteristics of individuals are associated with errors in self-assessments. Author's affiliation Philip Anglewicz University of Pennsylvania, United States of America Hans-Peter Kohler University of Pennsylvania, United States of America Keywords accuracy of perceived HIV status, AIDS/HIV, perceived risk, Sub-Saharan Africa Word count (Main text) 8149 Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
[ Back to previous page ]
|