© 1999 - 2010
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

Death distribution methods for estimating adult mortality
Sensitivity analysis with simulated data errors

References
View the references of this article
Services
Bookmark this page
Send this article to a friend
Download to Citation Manager
file Refman format (RIS)
file ProCite format (RIS)
file EndNote format
file BibTeX format
Citations and Similar Articles
PubMed
Articles by Kenneth Hill
Articles by Danzhen You
Articles by Yoonjoung Choi
Google Scholar
Articles by Kenneth Hill
Articles by Danzhen You
Articles by Yoonjoung Choi
Article and its Citations
 

Kenneth Hill
Danzhen You
Yoonjoung Choi

 
VOLUME 21 - ARTICLE 9
PAGES 235 - 254
Date Received: 2 Oct 2008
Date Published: 25 Aug 2009

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol21/9/

doi:10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.9
   
PDF file Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.

Abstract
TThe General Growth Balance (GGB) and Synthetic Extinct Generations (SEG) methods have been widely used to evaluate the coverage of registered deaths in developing countries. However, relatively little is known about how the methods behave in the presence of different data errors. This paper applies the methods (both singly and in combination) using non-stable populations of known mortality to which various data distortions in a variety of combinations have been applied. Results show that the methods work very well when the only errors in the data are those for which the methods were developed. For other types of error, performance is more variable, but on average, adjusted mortality estimates using the methods are closer to the true values than the unadjusted. The methods do surprisingly well in the presence of typical patterns of age misreporting, though GGB is more sensitive to coverage errors that change with age; the Basic SEG method (e.g. not adjusting for any slope with age of completeness estimates) is very sensitive to changes in census coverage; but once slope is adjusted for changing census, coverage has little effect. Fitting to the age range 5+ to 65+ is clearly preferable to fitting to 15+ to 55+. Both GGB and SEG are very sensitive to net migration, which is an Achilles heel for all of the methodologies in this paper. In populations not greatly affected by migration, our results suggest that an optimal strategy would be to apply GGB to estimate census coverage change, adjust for it and then apply SEG; in populations affected by migration, applying both GGB and SEG, fitting both to the age range 30+ to 65+, and averaging the results appears best.

Author's affiliation
Kenneth Hill
Harvard University, United States of America
Danzhen You
UNICEF, United States of America
Yoonjoung Choi
Johns Hopkins University, United States of America

Keywords
adult mortality, death distribution methods, estimation, sensitivity analysis, simulation

Word count (Main text)
3724

Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)
file[14-18] Neonatal mortality in the developing world
file[13-12] Unconventional approaches to mortality estimation

Similar articles in Demographic Research
file [13-12] Unconventional approaches to mortality estimation (estimation, adult mortality)
file [9-2] The problematic estimation of "imitation effects" in multilevel models (simulation, estimation)

[ Back to previous page ]