© 1999 - 2012
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility
Response to Westoff and Higgins

References
View the references of this article
Services
Bookmark this page
Send this article to a friend
Download to Citation Manager
file RIS format
file BibTeX format
Citations and Similar Articles
PubMed
Articles by Frances Goldscheider
Articles by Livia Sz. Oláh
Articles by Allan Puur
Google Scholar
Articles by Frances Goldscheider
Articles by Livia Sz. Oláh
Articles by Allan Puur
Article and its Citations
 

Frances Goldscheider
Livia Sz. Oláh
Allan Puur

 
VOLUME 22 - ARTICLE 8
PAGES 189 - 198
Date Received: 10 Sep 2009
Date Published: 5 Feb 2010

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol22/8/

doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.8
   
PDF file Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.

Abstract

A reflexion by Westoff and Higgins (2009) in response to a study by Puur, Oláh, Tazi-Preve and Dorbritz (2008) has been recently published in this journal. Both articles addressed the relationship between men’s gender attitudes and fertility, using different datasets and quite different measures of gender attitudes, producing divergent results. Based on that, the authors of the reflexion suggested caution regarding the conclusion of the Puur et al. analysis. We respond to their arguments here by elaborating on the theoretical underpinnings of the claim presented in the original article and thus the importance of the differences of the measures of gender attitudes applied in the two studies (gender roles in the public sphere vs. the private sphere). With this contribution, we stress the need for further research on the association of men’s gender attitudes and fertility.

Author's affiliation
Frances Goldscheider
University of Maryland, United States of America
Livia Sz. Oláh
Stockholm University, Sweden
Allan Puur
Estonian Institute for Population Studies, Tallinn University, Estonia

Keywords
Europe, fertility, gender attitudes, gender roles, men

Word count (Main text)
1715

Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)
file[25-4] Intergenerational family constellations in contemporary Europe: Evidence from the Generations and Gender Survey
file[24-9] Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second "YES"
file[22-28] Effects of education on second births before and after societal transition: Evidence from the Estonian GGS
file[19-56] Men's childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century
file[19-28] Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender equality
file[17-10] First union formation in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: patterns across countries and gender
file[4-2] Gender and family stability: Dissolution of the first parental union in Sweden and Hungary
file[S3-9] Becoming a Mother in Hungary and Poland during State Socialism

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
file [24-20] Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland (fertility, Europe)
file [24-10] Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second "NO" (fertility, Europe)
file [24-9] Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second "YES" (gender roles, fertility)
file [24-6] Preface to the Rostock Debate on Demographic Change (fertility, Europe)
file [21-27] Regional child care availability and fertility decisions in Spain (gender roles, fertility)

[ Back to previous page ]