Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.
Additional files The following additional files belong to this article. Click the icon to view the files.
To save them click the icon with the right mouse button and choose "Save target as..." or "Save link as..."
This paper argues against the suggestion that governments should push for gender equality more aggressively in order to raise fertility. The paper presents a threefold “no” to this proposal. It takes issue with the goal of raising fertility, arguing that the claims that fertility must be increased are based on myths. It rejects a more aggressive pursuit of gender equality for demographic purposes, maintaining that this method preserves inequality. It warns against using gender equality for fertility purposes, stating that this narrows the realm of gender equality.
The paper is based on a debate held at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, at which the author was asked to argue against the gender equality-fertility proposal. The other participants in the debate were Laurent Toulemon (“yes”), Dimiter Philipov (“no”), and Livia Oláh (“yes”).
Author's affiliation Gerda Neyer Stockholm University, Sweden
