Volume 24 - Article 17 | Pages 407-407

An editorial on plagiarism

By Nico Keilman, Joshua Goldstein, Andrew Hinde

Print this page  Send this article to a friend  Twitter

 

 
Date received:22 Feb 2011
Date published:08 Mar 2011
Word count:255
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.17
 

Abstract

In January this year, we were confronted with a case of plagiarism. One paper that had been submitted last year by a certain person turned out to be written by three other persons. It was presented by the three true authors at a conference in 2010, where they distributed copies of their paper. One of the reviewers of the paper informed us about that fact. We asked the three authors for a copy, which turned out to be identical with the submission, except for a few minor details. When confronted with these facts, the person who had submitted the paper was unable to give us a satisfactory explanation.

This is a case of serious scientific misconduct. The editors and the publisher of Demographic Research cannot and will not accept any form of plagiarism. Nor will we accept any other form of misconduct in science, including fabrication, falsification, or other practices that seriously deviate from those that are commonly accepted within the scientific community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research. With Long et al. ("Responding to possible plagiarism", Science 6 March 2009), we are of the opinion that the responsibility for research integrity ultimately lies in the hands of the scientific community: educators, students, authors, and those who provide peer reviews. Journal editors must take appropriate action and verify the originality of suspected manuscripts. The Office of Research Integrity provides useful guidelines (http://ori.dhhs.gov/).

We have decided that any future submission to Demographic Research that lists the plagiarist as an author or co-author will be rejected automatically.

Author's Affiliation

Nico Keilman - Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Norway [Email]
Joshua Goldstein - Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Germany [Email]
Andrew Hinde - University of Southampton, United Kingdom [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Fertility Reactions to the "Great Recession" in Europe: Recent Evidence from Order-Specific Data
Volume 29 - Article 4

» Probabilistic household forecasts based on register data- the case of Denmark and Finland
Volume 28 - Article 43

» Historical Addendum to "Life lived equals life left in stationary populations"
Volume 26 - Article 7

» Keeping a learned society young
Volume 20 - Article 22

» Unusually small sex differentials in mortality of Israeli Jews: What does the structure of causes of death tell us?
Volume 20 - Article 11

» Life lived equals life left in stationary populations
Volume 20 - Article 2

» Formal Relationships: Introduction and Orientation
Volume 20 - Article 1

» Fertility and union dissolution in Brazil: an example of multi-process modelling using the Demographic and Health Survey calendar data
Volume 17 - Article 7

» The proximate determinants of fertility and birth intervals in Egypt: An application of calendar data
Volume 16 - Article 3

» Found in translation?: A cohort perspective on tempo-adjusted life expectancy
Volume 14 - Article 5

» Why population forecasts should be probabilistic - illustrated by the case of Norway
Volume 6 - Article 15