© 1999 - 2012
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

An editorial on plagiarism

Services
Bookmark this page
Send this article to a friend
Download to Citation Manager
file RIS format
file BibTeX format
Citations and Similar Articles
PubMed
Articles by Nico Keilman
Articles by Joshua Goldstein
Articles by Andrew Hinde
Google Scholar
Articles by Nico Keilman
Articles by Joshua Goldstein
Articles by Andrew Hinde
Article and its Citations
 

Nico Keilman
Joshua Goldstein
Andrew Hinde

 
VOLUME 24 - ARTICLE 17
PAGES 407 - 407
Date Received: 22 Feb 2011
Date Published: 8 Mar 2011

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol24/17/

doi:10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.17
   
PDF file Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.

Abstract

In January this year, we were confronted with a case of plagiarism. One paper that had been submitted last year by a certain person turned out to be written by three other persons. It was presented by the three true authors at a conference in 2010, where they distributed copies of their paper. One of the reviewers of the paper informed us about that fact. We asked the three authors for a copy, which turned out to be identical with the submission, except for a few minor details. When confronted with these facts, the person who had submitted the paper was unable to give us a satisfactory explanation.

This is a case of serious scientific misconduct. The editors and the publisher of Demographic Research cannot and will not accept any form of plagiarism. Nor will we accept any other form of misconduct in science, including fabrication, falsification, or other practices that seriously deviate from those that are commonly accepted within the scientific community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research. With Long et al. ("Responding to possible plagiarism", Science 6 March 2009), we are of the opinion that the responsibility for research integrity ultimately lies in the hands of the scientific community: educators, students, authors, and those who provide peer reviews. Journal editors must take appropriate action and verify the originality of suspected manuscripts. The Office of Research Integrity provides useful guidelines (http://ori.dhhs.gov/).

We have decided that any future submission to Demographic Research that lists the plagiarist as an author or co-author will be rejected automatically.

Author's affiliation
Nico Keilman
University of Oslo, Norway
Joshua Goldstein
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Germany
Andrew Hinde
University of Southampton, United Kingdom

Keywords

Word count (Main text)
255

Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)
file[26-7] Historical Addendum to "Life lived equals life left in stationary populations"
file[20-22] Keeping a learned society young
file[20-11] Unusually small sex differentials in mortality of Israeli Jews: What does the structure of causes of death tell us?
file[20-2] Life lived equals life left in stationary populations
file[20-1] Formal Relationships: Introduction and Orientation
file[17-7] Fertility and union dissolution in Brazil: an example of multi-process modelling using the Demographic and Health Survey calendar data
file[16-3] The proximate determinants of fertility and birth intervals in Egypt: An application of calendar data
file[14-5] Found in translation?: A cohort perspective on tempo-adjusted life expectancy
file[6-15] Why population forecasts should be probabilistic - illustrated by the case of Norway

[ Back to previous page ]