© 1999 - 2012
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second "YES"

References
View the references of this article
Services
Bookmark this page
Send this article to a friend
Download to Citation Manager
file RIS format
file BibTeX format
Citations and Similar Articles
PubMed
Articles by Livia Sz. Oláh
Google Scholar
Articles by Livia Sz. Oláh
Article and its Citations
 

Livia Sz. Oláh

 
VOLUME 24 - ARTICLE 9
PAGES 217 - 224
Date Received: 
Date Published: 2 Feb 2011

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol24/9/

doi:10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.9
   
PDF file Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.

Additional files
The following additional files belong to this article. Click the icon to view the files. To save them click the icon with the right mouse button and choose "Save target as..." or "Save link as..."
file Videos

Abstract

This paper is based on my contribution to a debate, organized by MPIDR, on the question displayed in the title above. I was asked to present arguments for the "yes"-response (together with Laurent Toulemon, and arguing against the "no"-side represented by Gerda Neyer and Dimiter Philipov). As pointed out in the paper, the most important theoretical reasoning relevant for this question is the gender equity theory. A number of studies provide sound empirical support to it, as discussed in the paper in details, and thereby also a rationale for a positive impact of increased gender equality on fertility. As the dual-earner family is here to stay, and given the well-known negative consequences of long-term very low fertility for a society, pushing for gender equality seems to be a reasonable strategy to be considered aiming for sustainable societal development.

Author's affiliation
Livia Sz. Oláh
Stockholm University, Sweden

Keywords
desired fertility, division of household work, dual-earner family, fertility, gender equality, gender roles, parental leave, second births

Related links
file All publications in this Special Collection "Rostock Debate on Demographic Change" can be found at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/9/

Word count (Main text)
1468

Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)
file[22-8] Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility: Response to Westoff and Higgins
file[19-56] Men's childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century
file[19-28] Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender equality
file[4-2] Gender and family stability: Dissolution of the first parental union in Sweden and Hungary
file[S3-9] Becoming a Mother in Hungary and Poland during State Socialism

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
file [24-20] Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland (gender roles, fertility)
file [24-16] Economic crisis and recovery: Changes in second birth rates within occupational classes and educational groups (second births, fertility)
file [24-10] Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second "NO" (gender equality, fertility)
file [22-13] Can public policies sustain fertility in the Nordic countries?: Lessons from the past and questions for the future (gender equality, fertility)
file [22-8] Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility: Response to Westoff and Higgins (gender roles, fertility)

[ Back to previous page ]