Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the dyadic nature of reproduction, the couple is the most suitable context for
studying reproductive decision-making.
OBJECTIVE I investigate the effects of couple disagreement about short-term childbearing desires on the formulation and implementation of fertility intentions. Do men and women incorporate the perception of a disagreement with the partner about wanting a(nother) child now in their reports on short-term fertility intentions and contraceptive behaviour? Are there relevant differences by type of disagreement, parity, gender and gender equality within the couple?
METHODS Using individual-level data from the Austrian Generation and Gender Survey conducted
in 2008, I regress respondent’s short-term fertility intentions (ordinal regression models)
and non-use of contraception (logistic regression model) on couple’s short-term childbearing desires and a set of background variables.
RESULTS The findings show that disagreement is shifted toward a pregnancy intention\pregnancy-
seeking behaviour at parity zero and toward avoiding pregnancy and maintaining
contraceptive use at higher parities. Childless women are less responsive to the perception
of their partner’s desires than childless men when they express their short-term
childbearing intentions. Neither women nor men are likely to stop contraception if they perceive a disagreement with their partner about wanting a(nother) child. Moreover, if the
man is actively involved in childcare duties the chance to resolve the couple conflict in favour of childbearing increases.
CONCLUSIONS This paper calls for the collection of data from both members of each couple so that the
analysis of the partner’s actual desires can complement the analysis of the partner’s perceived desires.
Author's affiliation Maria Rita Testa Vienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria
