|
The incorporation of unobserved frailty in the analysis of mortality at adult ages is of considerable
theoretical and empirical interest. For instance, the estimation of relative frailty models sheds light on
questions of whether a convergence in the mortality rates of different subpopulations, or a ‘flattening’ of
the mortality curve with age, can be explained by a selection process towards low-frailty individuals in
heterogeneous populations.
While frailty models have been primarily applied to old and oldest-old mortality, recent evidence from
twin studies suggests that the consideration of unobserved heterogeneity among individuals in their
susceptibility to death is also relevant for the traditional age range from, say, 40–100 years.
The application of relative frailty models to these ages, however, is often hampered by the
fact that the observed mortality pattern across adult ages is well-described by a Gompertz
curve. In this case the estimation of the usual frailty models, which are based on Gompertz or
similar hazard functions, fails because the observed pattern lacks the typical ‘flattening’ of the
mortality curve that results from the selection towards low-frailty individuals in a heterogeneous
population.
In this paper we propose a modified DeMoivre hazard function which is suitable for the estimation of
frailty models of mortality for adult ages, e.g., between 40–95 years. The hazard conditional on a constant
frailty in this specification increases faster than exponential. The observed hazard, on the other hand, can
capture a broad range of mortality patterns that are commonly encountered in the analysis of mortality at
adult ages.
We apply the Gamma-distributed relative frailty model with a modified DeMoivre hazard to
male and female mortality in Bulgaria during 1992–93. The two characteristic features of this
mortality pattern are a substantial difference in the level of adult mortality between males
and females, and a considerably steeper increase of mortality with age for females than for
males. Our analyses show that a substantial part of this differential increase of mortality can be
explained by a differential selection process in the male and female population. Since the level
of mortality is higher for males than for females, the male population faces an earlier and
stronger selection towards low-frailty individuals, and the resulting differences in the frailty
composition of the population at older ages can explain the convergence between male and female
mortality.
This finding of our analyses is robust across different specifications for the hazard function. Moreover,
sensitivity analyses and a comparison with nonparametrically estimated hazard functions
show that the modified DeMoivre hazard function leads to plausible and relatively robust
estimates.
In summary, this paper provides a new substantive and methodological approach to the understanding
of mortality at adult and old ages. First, we propose a new hazard function that implies, conditional on
frailty, a faster than exponential increase of mortality with age. This model is therefore suitable
for the estimation of frailty models at ages between 40–100 years, i.e., the age range where
Gompertz or logistic models often yield a reasonable description of the observed mortality pattern.
Second, we argue that unobserved heterogeneity provides a plausible explanation of the adult
mortality pattern in Bulgaria — and possible also other countries — during the early 1990s. Our
estimations using the modified DeMoivre hazard function suggest that the stronger selection
process towards low-frailty individuals in the male population, caused by an overall higher level
of mortality, may constitute a primary mechanism leading to the convergence of male and
female mortality at higher ages. This finding implies that the convergence is not necessarily
caused by a differential process of aging across sexes, but is merely a consequence of the
different levels of mortality, and a subsequently different selection process, for males and
females.
|