Robert Schoen
Stefan H. Jonsson

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol9/6/

doi:10.4054/DemRes.2003.9.6

	Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file. Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.

Abstract
We observe that a dynamic population model can have period fertility that is always below replacement and cohort fertility that is always above replacement. We ask whether such a paradoxical population will get larger or smaller, and show that it must become smaller. Cohort replacement does not imply population replacement, and emphasizing fertility timing and cohort fertility ignores the issue of relative cohort size. The resolution of this apparent paradox reinforces the importance of the level of period fertility in demographic analysis.

Author's affiliation
Robert Schoen
Pennsylvania State University, United States of America
Stefan H. Jonsson
Pennsylvania State University, United States of America

Keywords
Bongaarts-Feeney adjusted fertility, cohort, cohort fertility, dynamic population model, fertility, fertility timing, period fertility

Word count (Main text)
1623

Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)

	[21-25] The metastable birth trajectory
	[19-49] A behaviorally-based approach to measuring inequality
	[13-5] Changing mortality and average cohort life expectancy
	[13-3] Age-specific contributions to changes in the period and cohort life expectancy
	[12-3] Intrinsically dynamic population models
	[9-1] Estimating multistate transition rates from population distributions
	[6-3] On the Impact of Spatial Momentum
	[4-6] Toward a General Model for Populations with Changing Rates

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

	[19-33] Fertility of Turkish and Moroccan women in the Netherlands: Adjustment to native level within one generation (fertility, cohort fertility)
	[13-4] Fertility decline in North-Central Namibia: An assessment of fertility in the period 1960-2000 based on parish registers (period fertility, cohort fertility)
	[8-6] Tempo-quantum and period-cohort interplay in fertility changes in Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden (fertility, cohort)
	[6-16] Period Fertility in Russia since 1930: an application of the Coale-Trussell fertility model (period fertility, fertility)
	[6-14] The Fertility Pattern of Twins and the General Population Compared: Evidence from Danish Cohorts 1945-64 (fertility, cohort fertility)

[ Back to previous page ]