Volume 17 - Article 15 | Pages 441–464  

Social mobility and fertility

By Gianpiero Dalla Zuanna

References

Aarssen, L.W. (2005). Why is fertility lower in wealthier countries? The role of relaxed fertility-selection. Population and Development Review 31(1): 113-126.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aassve, A., Mazzuco, S., and Mencarini, L. (2005). Childbearing and well-being: a comparative analysis of European welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 15: 283-299.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anh, T.S., Knodel, J., Lam, D., and Friedman, J. (1998). Family size and children education in Vietnam. Demography 35(1): 57-70.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ariès, P. (1980). Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the West. Population and Development Review 6(4): 645-650.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G. (1981). Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica, New Series 48(189): 1-15.

Download reference:

Berent, J. (1952). Fertility and social mobility. Population Studies 5(3): 244-260.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bettio, F. and Villa, P. (1998). A Mediterranean perspective on the breakdown of the relationship between job participation and fertility. Cambridge Journal of Economy 22: 137-171.

Download reference:

Billari, F. and Kohler, H.P. (2004). Pattern of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Population Studies 58(2): 161-176.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blake, J. (1989). Family Size and Achievement. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Blake, J. (1985). Number of siblings and social mobility. American Sociological Review 50: 84-94.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bresard, M. (1950). Mobilité sociale et dimension de la famille. Population 5(3): 211-566.

Download reference:

Caldwell, J. and Schindlmayr, T. (2003). Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: a search for commonalities. Population Studies 57(3): 241-263.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Caldwell, J.C. (2004). Demographic theory: a long view. Population and Development Review 30(2): 297-316.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Caldwell, J.C. (2005). On net intergenerational wealth flows: an update. Population and Development Review 31(4): 721-740.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Caldwell, J.C. (1982). Theory of Fertility Decline. London: Academic Press.

Download reference:

Carr-Saunders, A. (1936). World Population. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Casterline, J. (2001). The pace of fertility transition: national patterns in the second half of the twentieth century. In: Bulatao, R. and Casterline, J. (eds.). Global Fertility Transition, a supplement to vol. 27 of Population and Development Review. New York: Population Council: 17-52.

Download reference:

Cleland, J. and Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of fertility decline: an iconoclastic view. Population Studies 41: 5-30.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coale, A. (1973). The demographic transition reconsidered. Paper presented at the International Population Conference, vol. 1, Liege.

Download reference:

Dalla Zuanna, G. (2006). Population replacement, social mobility and development in Italy during the 20th century. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 11(2): 188-208.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dalla Zuanna, G. (2001). The banquet of Aeolus: a familistic interpretation of Italy’s lowest low fertility. Demographic Research 4(5): 133-162.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dalla Zuanna, G. (2004). The small number of children in the strong family. Values and low fertility in Italy. Genus 1: 39-70.

Download reference:

Dalla Zuanna, G. and Micheli, G. (eds.) (2004). Strong Family and Low Fertility: A Paradox? The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Download reference:

Davis, K. (1937 [1997]). Reproductive institutions and the pressure for population. Population and Development Review 23(3): 611-624.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, K. (1963). The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index 29(4): 345-366.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.) (2007). Family Formation and Family Dilemmas in Contemporary Europe. Bilbao, Spain: BBVA Foundation.

Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G., Guell, M., and Brodmann, S. (2007). When mothers work and fathers care. Household fertility decisions in Denmark and Spain. In: Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.). Family Formation and Family Dilemmas in Contemporary Europe. Bilbao, Spain: BBVA Foundation: 129-154.

Download reference:

Flandrin, J. (1976). Families in the Former Times. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Download reference:

Girard, A. (1951). Mobilité sociale et dimension de la famille. Deuxième Partie: enquête dans les lycées et les facultés. Population 6(1): 103-124.

Download reference:

Glass, D. (1965). Population growth and population policy. In: Sheps, M. and Ridley, J. (eds.). Public Health and Population Change. Pittsburgh, USA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Download reference:

Greenhalgh, S. (1988). Fertility as mobility: Sinic transition. Population and Development Review 14(4): 629-674.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Haaga, J. (2001). Comment: the pace of fertility decline and the utility of evolutionary approaches. In: Bulatao, R. and Casterline, J. (eds.). Global Fertility Transition, a supplement to vol. 27 of Population and Development Review. New York: Population Council: 53-59.

Download reference:

Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theories. Population and Development Review 29(3): 349-374.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hakim, C. (2000). Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Hoem, J.M. (2005). Why does Sweden have such high fertility? Demographic Research 13(22): 559-572.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Inglehart, R. (1977). Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.

Download reference:

Johansson, S. (1987b). Centuries of childhood / centuries of parenting: Philippe Ariès and the modernisation of privileged infancy. Journal of Family History 12: 343-365.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Johansson, S. (1997). Fertility and family history: using the past to explain the present. Population and Development Review 23(3): 627-637.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Johansson, S. (1987a). Status anxiety and demographic contraction of privileged populations. Population and Development Review 13(3): 439-470.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kaplan, H.S. and Lancaster, J.B. (2003). An evolutionary and ecological analysis of human fertility, mating patterns, and parental investment. In: Wachter, K.W. and Bulatao, R. (eds.). Offspring. Human Fertility Behaviour in Biodemographic Perspective. Washington, DC, USA: the National Academic Press: 170-223.

Download reference:

Knodel, J., Havanon, N., and Sittitrai, W. (1990). Family size and education of children in the context of rapid fertility decline. Population and Development Review 16(1): 31-62.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Knodel, J. and Wongsith, M. (1991). Family size and children education in Thailand: evidence from a national sample. Demography 28(1): 119-131.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.P., Behrman, J.R., and Skythe, A. (2005). Partner + Children = Happiness? The effects of partnerships and fertility on well-being. Population and Development Review 31(3): 407-445.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.P. and Rodgers, J.L. (2003). Education, fertility, and heritability: explaining a paradox. In: Wachter, K.W. and Bulatao, R. (eds.). Offspring. Human Fertility Behaviour in Biodemographic Perspective. Washington, DC, USA: the National Academic Press: 46-90.

Download reference:

Kohler, H.P., Rodgers, J.L., and Christensen, K. (1999). Is fertility behaviour in our genes? Findings from a Danish twin study. Population and Development Review 25: 253-288.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lam, D. (2003). Evolutionary biology and rational choice in models of fertility. In: Wachter, K.W. and Bulatao, R. (eds.). Offspring. Human Fertility Behaviour in Biodemographic Perspective. Washington, DC, USA: the National Academic Press: 322-338.

Download reference:

Lindert, P.H. (1980). Child costs and economic development. In: Easterlin, R.A. (ed.). Population and Economic Change in Developing Countries. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press: 4-79.

Download reference:

Livi Bacci, M. (2001). Too few children and too much family. Daedalus 3: 139-156.

Download reference:

Lloyd, C. (1994). Investing in the next generation: the implications of high fertility at the level of the family. In: Cassen, R. (ed.). Population and Development: Old Debates, New Conclusions. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: 181-202.

Download reference:

Lorimer, F. and Osborn, F. (1934). Dynamics of Population. New York, USA: The MacMillan Company.

Download reference:

Mason, K. (1997). Explaining fertility transition. Demography 34(4): 443-454.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theory of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26: 427-439.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McNicoll, G. (2001). Government and fertility in transitional and post-transitional societies. In: Bulatao, R. and Casterline, J. (eds.). Global Fertility Transition, a supplement to vol. 27 of Population and Development Review. New York: Population Council: 129-159.

Download reference:

Micheli, G. (2000). Kinship, family, and social network: the anthropological embedment of fertility change in Southern Europe. Demographic Research 3(13).

Download reference:

Notestein, F. (1945). Population, the long view. In: Schultz, T. (ed.). Food for the World. Chicago, USA: Chicago University Press.

Download reference:

Palomba, R. (1995). Italy, the invisible change. In: Palomba, R. and Moors, H. (eds.). Population, Family and Welfare. Oxford, UK: The Clarendon Press: 158-176.

Download reference:

Reher, D. (1998). Family ties in Western countries: persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2): 203-234.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schneider, P. and Schneider, J. (1996). Festival of the Poor: Fertility Decline and the Ideology of Class in Sicily, 1860-1980. Tucson, AR, USA: University of Arizona Press.

Download reference:

Smith, R.M. (ed.) (1984). Land, Kinship, and Life-Cycle. Cambridge, UK: CUP.

Download reference:

Thompson, W. and Lewis, D. (1964). Population Problems (5th edition). New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.

Download reference:

Udry, J.R. (1994). The nature of gender. Demography 31(4): 561-573.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van de Kaa, D. (1996). Anchored narratives: the story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility. Population Studies 50: 389-432.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van de Kaa, D. (2004). The true commonality: in reflexive modern societies fertility is a derivative. Population Studies 58(1): 77-92.

Download reference:

Wachter, K.W. (2003). Biodemography of fertility and family formation. In: Wachter, K.W. and Bulatao, R. (eds.). Offspring. Human Fertility Behaviour in Biodemographic Perspective. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academic Press: 1-17.

Download reference:

Wachter, K.W. and Bulatao, R. (2003). Offspring. Human Fertility Behaviour in Biodemographic Perspective. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academic Press.

Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. (1981). Another look at fertility and social mobility. Population Studies 35(1): 132-135.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. (1953). The changing focus of differential fertility research: the social mobility hypothesis. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 31(1): 24-38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Westoff, C.F., Potter Jr., R.G., and Sagi, P.C. (1963). The Third Child: A Study in Prediction of Fertility. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.

Download reference:

Westoff, C.F., Potter Jr., R.G., Sagi, P.C., and Mishler, E. (1961). Family Growth in Metropolitan America. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.

Download reference:

Zimmer, B.G. (1981). The impact of social mobility on fertility: a reconsideration. Population Studies 35(1): 120-131.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article