Volume 19 - Article 56 | Pages 1883–1912
Men's childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century
By Allan Puur, Livia Sz. Oláh, Mariam Irene Tazi-Preve, Jürgen Dorbritz
References
Ahn, N. and Mira, P. (2002). A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics 15(4): 667-682.
Becker, G.S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Bernhardt, E.M. (2004). Is the Second Demographic Transition a useful concept for demography? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2004: 25-28.
Bernhardt, E.M. and Goldscheider, F. (2006). Gender equality, parenthood attitudes, and first births in Sweden. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 19-39.
Bernhardt, E.M., Noack, T., and Lyngstad, T.H. (2008). Shared housework in Norway and Sweden: advancing the gender revolution. Journal of European Social Policy 18(3): 275-288.
Blossfeld, H.-P. (ed.) (1995). The new role of women: family formation in modern societies. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Blossfeld, H.-P. and Drobnic, S. (2001). A cross-national comparative approach to couples’ Career. In: Blossfeld, H.-P. and Drobnic, S. (eds.). Careers of couples in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press: 3-15.
Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. In: Bulatao, R.A. and Casterline, J.B. (eds.). Global fertility transition. Supplement to Population and Development Review 27. New York: Population Council: 260-281.
Bongaarts, J. (1990). The measurement of wanted fertility. Population and Development Review 16(3): 487-506.
Castles, F.G. (2003). The world turned upside down: below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy 13(3): 209-227.
Council of Europe (2006). Recent demographic developments in Europe 2005. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Fenstermaker, S. and West, C. (eds.) (2002). Doing gender, doing difference. Inequality, power and institutional change. New York: Routledge.
Frejka, T. and Sobotka, T. (2008). Overview Chapter 1: Fertility in Europe: Diverse, delayed and below replacement. Demographic Research “Special Collection 7: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe” 19(3): 15-46.
Frejka, T., Sobotka, T., Toulemon, L., and Hoem, J.M. (2008). Summary and general conclusions: childbearing trends and policies in Europe. Demographic Research, “Special Collection 7: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe” 19(2): 5-14.
Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review 96(2): 1-21.
Goldscheider, F.K. (2000). Men, children and the future of the family in the third millennium. Futures 32(6): 525-538.
Goldstein, J., Lutz, W., and Testa, M.R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement fertility ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 479-496.
Greene, M.E. and Biddlecom, A.E. (2000). Absent and problematic men: Demographic accounts of male reproductive roles. Population and Development Review 26(1): 81-115.
Hagewen, K.J. and Morgan, S.P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970-2002. Population and Development Review 31(3): 507-527.
Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review 29(3): 349-374.
Hakim, C. (2005). Sex differences in work-life balance. In: Houston, D. (ed.). Work-life balance in the 21st century. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan: 55-79.
Hobson, B. and Oláh, L.Sz. (2006). Birthstrikes? Agency and capabilities in the reconciliation of employment and family. Marriage and Family Review 39(3/4): 197-227.
Hoem, J. (2008). Overview Chapter 8: The impact of public policies on European fertility. Demographic Research “Special Collection 7: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe” 19(10): 249-260.
Höhn, C., Avramov, D., and Kotowska, I. (eds.) (2008). People, population change and policies. Lessons from population policy acceptance study. Berlin: Springer (Volumes 1-2).
Joshi, H. (1998). The opportunity costs of childbearing: More than mothers’ business. Journal of Population Economics 11(2): 161-183.
Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Journal of Family Issues 21(1): 128-144.
Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F.C., and Ortega, J.A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review 28(4): 641-680.
Mason, K.O. (2001). Gender and family systems in the fertility transition. In: Bulatao, R.A. and Casterline, J.B. (eds.). Global Fertility Transition. Supplement to Population and Development Review 27. New York: Population Council: 160-176.
McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427-439.
Moors, H. and Palomba, R. (eds.) (1995). Population, family and welfare. A comparative survey of European attitude 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Moors, H. and Palomba, R. (eds.) (1998). Population, family and welfare. A comparative survey of European attitude 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Neuwirth, N. and Wernhart, G. (2008). Work-life balance reconsidered. Time allocation within partnerships: Germany, UK and Austria. Vienna: Austrian Institute for Family Studies, University of Vienna (OIFS working paper 67).
Neyer, G. (2000). Gender issues in family and fertility research. In: Generations and gender programme. Exploring future research and data collection options. New York and Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations Population Fund: 90-93.
Noack, T. and Østby, L. (2002). Free to choose but unable to stick to It? In: Macura, M. and Beets, G. (eds.). Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe. Proceedings of the family and fertility surveys flagship conference 2. New York and Geneva: United Nations: 103-116.
Oppenheimer, V.K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review 20(2): 293-342.
Philipov, D. (2005). Comparative report on gender roles and relations. Summary policy implications regarding gender roles and relation. [unpublished report]. Vienna: Institute for Demography.
Philipov, D. (2008). Family-related gender attitudes. The three dimensions: ‘gender-role ideology’, ‘consequences for the family’, and ‘economic consequences’. In: Höhn, C., Avramov, D., and Kotowska, I. (eds.). People, population change and policies. Lessons from population policy acceptance study 2. Berlin: Springer: 153-174.
Quesnel-Vallée, A. and Morgan, S.P. (2003). Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 497-525.
Ridgeway, C.L. and Correll, S.J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society 18(4): 510-531.
Ruckdeschel, K. (2008). Attitudes towards gender roles and fertility behaviour. In: Höhn, C., Avramov, D., and Kotowska, I. (eds.). People, population change and policies. Lessons from population policy acceptance study 2. Berlin: Springer: 175-192.
Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research “Special Collection 7: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe” 19(6): 85-138.
Tazi-Preve, I.M., Bichlbauer, D., and Goujon, A. (2004). Gender trouble and its impact on fertility intentions. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland 40: 5-24.
Testa, M.R. (2007). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 357-379.
Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions and births. Demography 34(3): 343-354.
Thomson, E. and Hoem, J.M. (1998). Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography 35(3): 315-322.
Thomson, E., McDonald, E., and Bumpass, L. (1990). Fertility desires and fertility: hers, his and theirs. Demography 27(4): 579-588.
Torr, B.M. and Short, S.E. (2004). Second births and the second shift: a research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review 30(1): 109-130.
Turner, C. and Martin, E. (1984). Surveying subjective phenomena 1-2. Russell Sage: New York.
Van de Kaa, D.J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42(1) (Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau Inc).
Van de Kaa, D.J. (2004). The true commonality: In reflexive modern societies fertility is derivative. In: Billari, F.C., Frejka, T., Hobcraft, J., Macura, M., and van de Kaa, D.J. (eds.). Discussion of paper ‘Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: A search for commonalities’. Population Studies 57(3): 241-263, by John Caldwell and Thomas Schindlmayr. : 77-80 (Population Studies 58(1): 77-92).
Van Peer, C. (2002). Desired and achieved fertility. In: Macura, M. and Beets, G. (eds.). Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe. Proceedings of the family and fertility surveys flagship conference 2. New York and Geneva: United Nations: 117-142.
Van Peer, C. and Rabusic, L. (2008). Will we see an upturn in European fertility in the near future? In: Höhn, C., Avramov, D., and Kotowska, I. (eds.). People, population change and policies. Lessons from population policy acceptance study 12. Berlin: Springer: 215-241.