Volume 28 - Article 11 | Pages 313–340  

Does the kin orientation of a British woman’s social network influence her entry into motherhood?

By Paul Mathews, Rebecca Sear

References

Allison, P.D. (1984). Event History Analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Download reference:

Avogo, W. and Agadjanian, V. (2008). Men's Social Networks and Contraception in Ghana. Journal of Biosocial Science 40(3): 413-429.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Behrman, J.R., Kohler, H.P., and Watkins, S.C. (2002). Social networks and changes in contraceptive use over time: Evidence from a longitudinal study in rural Kenya. Demography 39(4): 713-738.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernardi, L. (2003). Channels of social influence on reproduction. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 527-555.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernardi, L., Mynarska, M., and Rossier, C. (2010). Intentions, unvertainty and ambivalence in fertility decisions. Paper presented at the European Population Conferece, Vienna, September 1-4 2010.

Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2004). Perpetual postponers? Women's, men's and couple's fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends 117: 9-19.

Download reference:

Berthoud, R. (2000). Family Formation in Multi-cultural Britain: Three patterns of diversity. Colchester: Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER Working Paper).

Download reference:

Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2009). Tradeoffs and sexual conflict over women's fertility preferences in Mpimbwe. American Journal of Human Biology 21(4): 478-487.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Box-Steffensmeier, J.M. and Jones, B.S. (2004). Event history modeling : A guide for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download reference:

Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J. (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Download reference:

Burch, T.K. and Gendell, M. (1970). Extended Family Structure and Fertility: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Journal of Marriage and Family 32(2): 227-236.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cleland, J. and Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view. Population Studies 41(1): 5-30.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coleman, D.A. and Dubuc, S. (2010). The fertility of ethnic minorities in the UK, 1960s-2006. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography 64(1): 19-41.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Connolly, H. and Raha, C. (2006). Chapter 4: Households and families. In: Dobbs, J., Green, H., and Zealey, L. (eds.). Focus on Ethnicity and Religion. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan: 83-10.

Download reference:

Davis, K. and Blake, J. (1956). Social Structure and Fertility: An Analytic Framework. Economic Development and Cultural Change 4(3): 211-235.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Del Boca, D. (2002). The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economics 15(3): 549-573.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dunbar, R. and Spoors, M. (1995). Social networks, support cliques, and kinship. Human Nature 6(3): 273-290.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ekert-Jaffe, O., Joshi, H., Lynch, K., Mougin, R., Rendall, M., and Shapiro, D. (2002). Fertility, Timing of Births and Socio-economic Status in France and Britain: Social Policies and Occupational Polarization. Population (English Edition, 2002-) 57(3): 475-507.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gray, A. (2005). The Changing Availability of Grandparents as Carers and its Implications for Childcare Policy in the UK. Journal of Social Policy 34(04): 557-577.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Grundy, E. (1986). Migration and fertility behaviour in England and Wales: A record linkage study. Journal of Biosocial Science 18(04): 403-423.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Grundy, E. and Murphy, M. (2006). Kin Availability, Contact and Support Exchanges Between Adult Children and their Parents in Great Britain. In: Ebtehaj, F., Lindley, B., and Richards, M. (eds.). Kinship Matters. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 195-215.

Download reference:

Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1): 1-16.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hank, K. and Kreyenfeld, M. (2003). A Multilevel Analysis of Child Care and Women's Fertility Decisions in Western Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 65(3): 584-596.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Helleringer, S. and Kohler, H.-P. (2005). Social Networks, Perceptions of Risk, and Changing Attitudes Towards HIV/AIDS: New Evidence from a Longitudinal Study Using Fixed-Effects Analysis. Population studies 59(3): 265-282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hensvik, L. and Nilsson, P. (2010). Businesses, buddies and babies: social ties and fertility at work. Uppsala: Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (Working Paper Series).

Download reference:

Hrdy, S. (2009). Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Keim, S., Klarner, A., and Bernardi, L. (2009). Qualifying Social Influence on Fertility Intentions: Composition, Structure and Meaning of Fertility-relevant Social Networks in Western Germany. Current Sociology 57(6): 888-907.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K.E. (1992). The Impact of Family Disruption in Childhood on Transitions Made in Young Adult Life. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography 46(2): 213-234.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K.E. (1989). Who remains childless? Journal of Biosocial Science 21(04): 387-398.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K.E. and Hobcraft, J. (1997). Parental Divorce during Childhood: Age at First Intercourse, Partnership and Parenthood. Population Studies 51(1): 41-55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kneale, D. and Joshi, H. (2008). Postponement and childlessness - Evidence from two British cohorts. Demographic Research 19(58): 1935-1968.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.P. (1997). Learning in social networks and contraceptive choice. Demography 34(3): 369-383.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.P., Behrman, J.R., and Watkins, S.C. (2001). The density of social networks and fertility decisions: Evidence from South Nyanza District, Kenya. Demography 38(1): 43-58.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J.R., and Watkins, S.C. (2000). Empirical assessments of social networks, fertility and family planning programs: nonlinearities and their implications. Demographic Research 3(7).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kulu, H. and Milewski, N. (2007). Interdependencies in the life course: family, fertility, and migration. Rostock: MPIDR.

Download reference:

Kuziemko, I. (2006). Is Having Babies Contagious? Estimating Fertility Peer Effects Between Siblings. Yale University.

Download reference:

Mace, R. and Colleran, H. (2009). Kin influence on the decision to start using modern contraception: A longitudinal study from rural Gambia. American Journal of Human Biology 21(4): 472-477.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mace, R. and Sear, R. (2005). Are humans cooperative breeders? In: Voland, E., Chasiotis, A., and Schiefenhoevel, W. (eds.). Grandmotherhood: The Evolutionary Significance of the Second Half of Female Life. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press: 143-159.

Download reference:

Madhavan, S., Adams, A., and Simon, D. (2003). Women's networks and the social world of fertility behavior. International Family Planning Perspectives 29(2): 58-68.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manlove, J. (1997). Early Motherhood in an Intergenerational Perspective: The Experiences of a British Cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family 59(2): 263-279.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Montgomery, M.R. and Casterline, J.B. (1996). Social Learning, Social Influence, and New Models of Fertility. Population and Development Review 22(151-175).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Montgomery, M.R. and Casterline, J.B. (1993). The Diffusion of Fertility-Control in Taiwan - Evidence from Pooled Cross-Section Time-Series Models. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography 47(3): 457-479.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Montgomery, M.R. and Chung, W. (1999). Social Networks and the Diffusion of Fertility Control in the Republic of Korea. In: Leete, R. (ed.). Dynamics of Values in Fertility Change. Oxford: Oxford University: 179-209.

Download reference:

Murphy, M. (1999). Is the relationship between fertility of parents and children really weak? Biodemography and Social Biology 46(1-2): 122-145.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. (2008). Variations in Kinship Networks Across Geographic and Social Space. Population and Development Review 34(1): 19-49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. and Wang, D.L. (2001). Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. European Journal of Population 17(1): 75-96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musalia, J.M. (2006). Gender, children and family planning networks in Kenya. Social Science Journal 43(1): 167–172.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nettle, D. and Pollet, T.V. (2008). Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans. The American Naturalist 172(5): 658-666.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Newson, L. , Postmes, T., Lea, S.E.G., Webley, P., Richerson, P.J., and Mcelreath, R. (2007). Influences on communication about reproduction: The cultural evolution of low fertility. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(3): 199-210.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Newson, L., Postmes, T., Lea, S.E.G., and Webley, P. (2005). Why are modern families small? Toward an evolutionary and cultural explanation for the demographic transition. Personality and Social Psychology Review 9(4): 360-375.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84(3): 231-259.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nolan, J. and Scott, J. (2006). Gender and Kinship in Contemporary Britain. In: Ebtehaj, F., Lindley, B. , and Richards, M. (eds.). Kinship Matters. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 175-194.

Download reference:

Owen, C., Mooney, A., Brannen, J., and Statham, J. (2004). Wider Family. In: Dex, S. and Joshi, H. (eds.). Millennium Cohort Study First Survey: A User’s Guide to Initial Findings. Centre for Longitudinal Studies Bedford Group for Lifecourse & Statistical Studies Institute of Education, University of London: 51-74.

Download reference:

Pahl, R. (2005). Are all communities communities in the mind? The Sociological Review 53(4): 621-640.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pahl, R. and Pevalin, D.J. (2005). Between family and friends: A longitudinal study of friendship choice. British Journal of Sociology 56(3): 433-451.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Portanti, M. and Whitworth, S. (2009). A comparison of the characteristics of childless women and mothers in the ONS Longitudinal Study. Population Trends 136(1): 10-20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Prandy, K. (1999). Class, stratification and inequalities in health: A comparison of the Registrar-General's Social Classes and the Cambridge Scale. Sociology of Health & Illness 21(4): 466-484.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pronzato, C. (2007). British Household Panel Survey Consolidated Marital, Cohabitation and Fertility Histories, 1991-2006. Colchester: Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER Working Paper).

Download reference:

Ratcliffe, A. and Smith, S. (2006). Fertility and women’s education in the UK: A cohort analysis. (CMPO Working Paper).

Download reference:

Rendall, M. and Smallwood, S. (2003). Higher Qualifications, First Birth Timing, and Further Childbearing in England and Wales. Population Trends 111: 18-26.

Download reference:

Rendall, M.S., Ekert-Jaffé, O., Joshi, H., Lynch, K., and Mougin, R. (2009). Universal versus Economically Polarized Change in Age at First Birth: A French and British Comparison. Population and Development Review 35(1): 89-115.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rindfuss, R.R., Choe, M.K., Bumpass, L.L., and Tsuya, N.O. (2004). Social Networks and Family Change in Japan. American Sociological Review 69(6): 838-861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rindfuss, R.R., Guilkey, D., Morgan, S.P., Kravdal, Ø., and Guzzo, K.B. (2007). Child Care Availability and First-Birth Timing in Norway. Demography 44(2): 345-372.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rotkirch, A. (2007). All that she wants is a(nother) baby’? Longing for children as a fertility incentive of growing importance. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 5(1): 89-104.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ruggles, S. (1994). The Transformation of American Family Structure. The American Historical Review 99(1): 103-128.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Russell, S.T. (1994). Life Course Antecedents of Premarital Conception in Great Britain. Journal of Marriage and Family 56(2): 480-492.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sandberg, J. (2005). The Influence of Network Mortality Experience on Nonnumeric Response Concerning Expected Family Size: Evidence from a Nepalese Mountain Village. Demography 42(4): 737-756.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schafer, J.L. (1995). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Bury St Edmunds: Chapman & Hall.

Download reference:

Sear, R. and Coall, D. (2011). How Much Does Family Matter? Cooperative Breeding and the Demographic Transition. Population and Development Review 37: 81-112.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sear, R. and Mathews, P. (2009). The impact of kin on female fertility: A systematic review. Paper presented at the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Marrakesh, , Morocco, 28 September - 2 October 2009.

Download reference:

Turke, P.W. (1989). Evolution and the demand for children. Population and Development Review 15(1): 61-90.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wheelock, J. and Jones, K. (2002). 'Grandparents Are the Next Best Thing': Informal Childcare for Working Parents in Urban Britain. Journal of Social Policy 31(03): 441-463.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Young, M. and Wilmott, P. (1957). Family and Kinship in East London. London: Penguin.

Download reference:

Zajonc, R.B. (2000). Feeling and thinking : Closing the Debate Over the Independence of Affect. In: Forgas, J.P. (ed.). Feeling and thinking : The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press: 31-58.

Download reference:

Back to the article