Volume 28 - Article 43 | Pages 1263–1302  

Probabilistic household forecasts based on register data- the case of Denmark and Finland

By Solveig Christiansen, Nico Keilman

References

Alders, M. (2001). Huishoudensprognose 2000-2050: Veronderstellingen over onzekerheidsmarges (Household forecast 2000-2050: assumptions on uncertainty intervals). Maandstatistiek van de Bevolking 8: 14–17.

Download reference:

Alders, M. (1999). Stochastische huishoudensprognose 1998-2050 (Stochastic household forecast 1998-2050). Maandstatistiek van de Bevolking 11: 25–34.

Download reference:

Alders, M., Keilman, N., and Cruijsen, H. (2007). Assumptions for long-term stochastic population forecasts in 18 European countries. European Journal of Population 23(1): 33-69.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Alho, J., Alders, M., Cruijsen, H., Keilman, N., T., Nikander, and Quang Pham, D. (2006). New forecast: Population decline postponed in Europe. Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE12(23): 1-10.

Download reference:

Alho, J., Cruijsen, H., and Keilman, N. (2008). Empirically based specification of forecast uncertainty. In: Alho, J., Hougaard Jensen, S., and Lassila, J. (eds.). Uncertain Demographics and Fiscal Sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 34-54.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Alho, J. and Keilman, N. (2010). On future household structure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 173(1): 117-143.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Arminger, G. and Galler, H. (1991). Demografische relevante Modellrechnungen: Simulations- und Analyseverfahren auf der Basis empirischer Erhebungen. Materialien zur Bevölkerungswissenschaft Heft 72. Wiesbaden: Bundersinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung.

Download reference:

Bell, M. , Cooper, J., and Les, M. (1995). Household and family models: A review. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Housing and Regional Development.

Download reference:

Christiansen, S. (2012). Household and family development in the Nordic countries: An overview. Paper presented at the International Seminar: Aging Households and the Nordic Welfare Model, Copenhagen, November 9-10 2012.

Download reference:

De Beer, J. and Alders, M. (1999). Probabilistic population and household forecasts for the Netherlands. Geneva: Joint Economic Commission for Europe–EUROSTAT Work Session on Demographic Projections, Perugia, May 3rd–7th (Working paper 45).

Download reference:

Fredriksen, D. (1998). Projections of population, education, labour supply and public pension benefits: Analyses with the dynamic microsimulation model MOSART. Oslo: Statistics Norway (Social and Economic Studies 101).

Download reference:

Galler, H. (1988). Microsimulation of household formation and dissolution. In: Keilman, N., Kuijsten, A., and Vossen, A. (eds.). Modelling household formation and dissolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 139–159.

Download reference:

Grundy, E. and Jital, M. (2007). Socio-demographic variations in moves to institutional care 1991–2001: A record linkage study from England and Wales. Age and Ageing 36(4): 424-430.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Højbjerg Jacobsen, R., Hougaard Jensen, S.E., and Rebbe, S.K. (2011). Husholdningsstrukturen i Danmark under forvandling: Betyder det noget for de offentlige udgifter? Nationaloekonomisk Tidsskrift 149(1-3): 109-125.

Download reference:

Jiang, L. and O’Neill, B. (2006). Impacts of demographic events on US household change. Laxenburg (Interim Report IR-06-030).

Download reference:

Jiang, L. and O’Neill, B. (2004). Toward a new model for probabilistic household forecasts. International Statistical Review 72: 51–64.

Download reference:

Keilman, N. and Brunborg, H. (1995). Household projections for Norway 1990-2020. Oslo (Reports 95/21).

Download reference:

Keilman, N., Kuijsten, A., and Vossen, A. (1988). Modelling household formation and dissolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Download reference:

King, D. (1999). Official household projections in England: Methodology, usage and sensitivity tests. Geneva: Joint Economic Commission for Europe–EUROSTAT Work Session on Demographic Projections, Perugia, May 3rd–7th (Working paper 47).

Download reference:

King, M. (2004). What fates impose: Facing up to uncertainty, British Academy lecture.

Kuijsten, A. and Vossen, A. (1988). Introduction: Modelling household formation and dissolution. In: Keilman, N., Kuijsten, A., and Vossen, A. (eds.). Modelling household formation and dissolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 3–12.

Download reference:

Lakdawalla, D., Goldman, D.P., Bhattacharya, J., Hurd, M., Joyce, G., and Panis, C. (2003). Forecasting the nursing home population. Medical Care 41(1): 8-20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lakdawalla, D. and Philipson, T. (1999). Ageing and the growth of long-term care. NBER Working paper series, National Bureau of Economic Research (Reports 95/21).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lee, M. and Tuljapurkar, S. (2007). The degree of certainty in population projections. Population Reference Bureau.

Download reference:

Lee, R. (1999). Probabilistic approaches to population forecasting. Population and Development Review 24(supplement): 156–190.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lind, M. (2008). Draft description of addressing in Denmark- Overview of legislation, authority, address registries and address components. Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority.

Download reference:

Martikainen, P., Moustgaar, H., Murphy, M., Einiö, E.K., Koskinen, S., Martelin, T., and Noro, A. (2009). Gender, living arrangements, and social circumstances as determinants of entry into and exit from long-term institutional care at older ages: A 6-year follow-up study of older Finns. The Gerontologist 49(1): 34-45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Muller, C., Gnanasekaran, K., and Knapp, K. (1999). Housing and living arrangements for the elderly: An international comparison study. New York: International Longevity Center.

Download reference:

Niemi, T. (2011). The Finnish address system. Finland: Population Register Centre.

Download reference:

Nihtilä, E. and Martikainen, P. (2008). Why older people living with a spouse are less likely to be institutionalized: The role of socioeconomic factors and health characteristics. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 36(1): 35-43.

Weblink:
Download reference:

O’Neill, B. and Chen, B. (2002). Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States. Population and Development Review 28(supplement): 53–88.

Download reference:

Scherbov, S. and Ediev, D. (2007). Probabilistic household projections based on an extension of headship rates method with application to the case of Russia. Geneva: Joint Economic Commission for Europe–EUROSTATWork Session on Demographic Projections, Bucharest, Oct. 10th–12th (working paper 16).

Download reference:

United Nations (1973). Methods of projecting households and families. New York: United Nations.

Download reference:

US National Resources Planning Committee (1938). The problems of a changing population. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.

Download reference:

Van Duin, C. and Harmsen, C. (2009). Een nieuw model voor de CBS huishoudensprognose (A new model for the CBS household forecasts). Bevolkingstrends, statistisch kwartaalblad over de demografie van Nederland 57(3): 20-42.

Download reference:

Van Imhoff, E. (1992). A general characterization of consistency algorithms in multidimensional demographic projection models. Population Studies 46(1): 159-169.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Imhoff, E. and Keilman, N. (1991). LIPRO 2.0: An application of a dynamic demographic projection model to household structure in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

Download reference:

Van Imhoff, E., Kuijsten, A., Hooimeijer, P., and van Wissen, L. (1995). Household demography and household modelling. New York: Plenum Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wachter, K. (1987). Microsimulation of household cycles. In: Bongaarts, J., Burch, T.K., and Wachter, K.W. (eds.). Family demography: Methods and their application. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 215–227.

Download reference:

Zeng, Y., Land, K., Wang, Z., and Gu, D. (2007). U.S. family household momentum and dynamics: An extension and application of the ProFamy method. Population Research and Policy Review 25: 1–41.

Download reference:

Back to the article