Volume 29 - Article 42 | Pages 1153–1186
Register-based estimates of parents' coresidence in Sweden, 1969-2007
By Elizabeth Thomson, Helen Eriksson
References
Andersson, G. (2002). Children’s experience of family disruption and family formation: Evidence from 16 FFS countries. Demographic Research 7: 344–364.
Andersson, G. (2002). Dissolution of unions in Europe: A comparative overview. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 27: 493–504.
Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., Teschner, K., and Vikat, A. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demographic Research 20: 313–352.
Auriat, N. (1993). “My wife knows best”: A comparison of event dating accuracy between the wife, the husband, the couple, and the Belgium population register. Public Opinion Quarterly 57: 165–190.
Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F. (2003). Cohabitation, marriage, first birth: The interrelationship of family formation events in Spain. European Journal of Population 19: 147–169.
Baizán, P., Aassve, A., and Billari, F. (2004). The interrelations between cohabitation, marriage and first birth in Germany and Sweden. Population and Environment 25(6): 531–561.
Belli., R.F., Shay, W.L., and Stafford, F.P. (2001). Event history calendars and question list surveys: A direct comparison of interviewing methods. The Public Opinion Quarterly 65(1): 45–74.
Bernhardt, E. and Hoem, B. (1985). Cohabitation and social background: Trends observed for Swedish women born between 1936 and 1960. European Journal of Population 1(4): 375–395.
Brown, A. and Kiernan, K. (1981). Cohabitation in Great Britain: Evidence from the General Household Survey. Population Trends 25: 4–10.
Bumpass, L. and Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies 54(1): 29–41.
Carlson, M., Garfinkel, I., McLanahan, S., Mincy, R., and Primus, W. (2004). The effects of welfare and child support policies on union formation. Population Research and Policy Review 23: 513–542.
Cassell, P.-G. (2002). Changing seasonality of births in Sweden 1900-1999. In: Carling, J. (ed.). Nordic Demography: Trends and Differentials. Scandinavian Population Studies. Oslo: Unipub forlag/Nordic Demographic Society: 97–110.
Cooper, J. (1991). Births outside of marriage: recent trends and associated demographic and social changes. Population Trends 63: 8–18.
Duncan, G.J., Joshi, H., and Mayer, K.U. (2005). An evaluation of the Swedish Level of Living Survey (LNU). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet, Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie.
Ferrarini, T. and Duvander, A.-Z. (2010). Earner-carer model at the crossroads: Reforms and outcomes of Sweden’s family policy in comparative perspective. International Journal of Health Services 40(3): 373–398.
Gerster, M., Keiding, N., Knudsen, L.B., and Strandberg-Larsen, K. (2007). Education and second birth rates in Denmark, 1981–1994. Demographic Research 17: 181–202.
Granström, F. (1997). Fertility and Family Surveys in Countries of the ECE Region: Standard Country Report, Sweden. New York, Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, UNECE Economic Studies .
Groves, R.M. (1991). Measurement error across disciplines. In: Biemer, P.P., Groves, R.M., Lyberg, L.E., Mathiowetz, N.A., and Sudman, S. (eds.). Measurement Errors in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 1–28.
Hayford, S.R. and Morgan, P. (2008). The quality of retrospective data on cohabitation. Demography 45(1): 129–141.
Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J.M., and Furstenberg, F.F., Jr. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: Results from 17 Western countries. Population and Development Review 29(1): 47–71.
Hoem, J.M. (1997). Educational gradients in divorce risks in Sweden in recent decades. Population Studies 51: 19–27.
Hoem, J.M. (1991). To marry, just in case...: the Swedish widow's-pension reform and the peak in marriages in December 1989. Acta Sociologica 34: 127–135.
Hoem, J.M. and Rennermalm, B. (1985). Modern family initiation in Sweden: Experience of women born between 1936 and 1960. European Journal of Population 1: 81–112.
Jalovaara, M. and Miettinen, A. (2013). Does his paycheck also matter? The socio-economic resources of co-residential partners and entry into parenthood in Finland. Demographic Research 28: 881–916.
Jonsson, J.O. and Gähler, M. (1997). Family dissolution, family reconstitution, and children's educational careers: Recent evidence for Sweden. Demography 34(2): 277–293.
Keilman, N. (2006). Households and Families. In: Wunsch, G., Caselli, G., and Vallin, J. (eds.). Demography: Analysis and Synthesis. Amsterdam: Academic Press: 457–476.
Keilman, N. and Brunborg, H. (1995). Household projections for Norway 1990–2020. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
Kennedy, S. and Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research 19: 1663–1692.
Kennedy, S. and Fitch, C.A. (2012). Measuring cohabitation and family structure in the United States: Assessing the impact of new data from the Current Population Survey. Demography 49(4): 1479–1498.
Kennedy, S. and Thomson, E. (2010). Children’s experiences of family disruption in Sweden: Differentials by parent education over three decades. Demographic Research 23: 479–508.
Klijzing, E. and Cairns, H. (2000). On the quality of FFS event history data: Of critical importance in life course research. Bielefeld, Germany: University of Bielefeld, Globalife Working Paper .
Klijzing, E. and Corijn, M. (eds.) (2002). Dynamics of Fertility and Partnership in Europe: Insights and Lessons from Comparative Research. Geneva, New York: United Nations.
Knab, J.T. and McLanahan, S. (2007). Measuring cohabitation: Does how, when, and who you ask matter? In: Hofferth, S.L. and Casper, L.M. (eds.). Handbook of Measurement Issues in Family Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 19–33.
Lappegård, T. and Rønsen, M. (2013). Socioeconomic differentials in multi-partner fertility among men. Demography 50(3): 1135–1153.
Lesthaeghe, R. and Neels, K. (2002). From the first to a second demographic transition: An interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population 18: 325–360.
Lesthaeghe, R.J. and Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review 32(4): 669–698.
Manning, W.D. and Bulanda, R.E. (2007). Cohabitation and measurement of family trajectories. In: Hofferth, S. L. and Casper, L. M. (eds.). Handbook of Measurement Issues in Family Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 199–219.
Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4): 989–1002.
Martin, E. (1999). Who knows who lives here? Within-household disagreements as a source of survey coverage error. The Public Opinion Quarterly 63(2): 220–236.
McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the Second Demographic Transition. Demography 41(4): 607–627.
Ohlsson-Wijk, S. (2011). Sweden’s marriage revival: An analysis of the new-millennium switch from long-term decline to increasing popularity. Population Studies 65(2): 183–200.
Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., Berghammer, C., and Di Giulio, P. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries, 1970s to early 2000s. Population Studies 66(2): 167–182.
Perelli-Harris, B. and Sánchez Gassen, N. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467.
Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801.
Peters, H.E. (1988). Retrospective versus panel data in analyzing lifecycle events. The Journal of Human Resources 23(4): 488–513.
Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, Married, Single: Portraying, Analyzing, and Modeling New Living Arrangements in the Changing Societies of Europe. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
Raley, R.K. and Wildsmith, E. (2004). Cohabitation and children's family instability. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(1): 210–219.
Rendall, M., Joshi, H., Oh, J., and Verropoulou, G. (2001). Comparing the childrearing lifetimes of Britain’s divorce-revolution men and women. European Journal of Population 17(4): 365–388.
Rendall, M.S., Clarke, L., Peters, H.E., Ranjit, N., and Verropoulou, G. (1999). Incomplete reporting of male fertility in the United States and Britain: A research note. Demography 36(1): 135–144.
Rendall, M.S., Ekert-Jaffé, O., Joshi, H., Lynch, K., and Mougin, R. (2009). Universal versus economically polarized change in age at first birth: A French-British comparison. Population and Development Review 35(1): 89–115.
Slaastad, T.I., Flekke, L., Hødahl, U.H., Lillegård, M., Rustad Thorsen, L., and Tuhus, P. (2012). Sammenligning av utvalgsbasert och registerbasert samlivs statistikk [Comparison of survey- and register-based cohabitation statistics]. Oslo, Norway, Statistics Norway Internal Document 10/2012.
Smith, J.P. and Thomas, D. (2003). Remembrances of things past: Test-retest reliability of retrospective migration data. Journal of the Royal Statistics Series A 166(1): 23–49.
Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(Special Collection 7: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe): 85–138.
Sweden, Statistics (2006). Background Facts, Population and Welfare Statistics. Stockholm, Sweden: Population and Welfare Department, Statistics Sweden, Historic population register.
Sweden, Statistics (2008). BEFPAK-Befolkningsförändringar [BEFPAK-Population Changes]. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
Sweden, Statistics (2003). Enstamstående och sammanboende i folkbok föringen, taxeringen och i verkligheten [Single and cohabiting persons in population registers, tax registers and reality]. Stockholm, Sweden, Bakgrundsfakta.
Sweden, Statistics (1992). Familjeförändringar kring 1980 och 1985 [Family formation and dissolution around 1980 and 1985]. Stockholm, Sweden: Statistiska meddelande BE 15 SM 9201.
Sweden, Statistics (2010). Multi-generation register 2009: A description of contents and quality. Stockholm, Sweden: Population and Welfare Department, Statistics Sweden, Background Facts, Population and Welfare Statistics.
Teitler, J.O., Reichman, N.E., and Koball, H. (2006). Contemporaneous versus retrospective reports of cohabitation in the Fragile Families Survey. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(2): 469–477.
Thomson, E. (2005). Partnership and parenthood: Connections between cohabitation, marriage and childbearing. In: Booth, A. and Crouter, N. (eds.). The New Population Problem: Why Families in Developed Countries are Shrinking and What It Means. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 129–149.
Thomson, E. and Eriksson, H. (2010). Register-based estimates of parental separation in Sweden. Stockholm Sweden: Demography Unit, Stockholm University, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography.
Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F., Arens, Z., Fricker, S., Lee, S., and Smith, E. (2006). Everyday concepts and classification errors: Judgments of disability and residence. Journal of Official Statistics 22(3): 385–418.
Tourangeau, R., Shapiro, G., Kearney, A., and Ernst, L. (1997). Who lives here? Survey undercoverage and household roster questions. Journal of Official Statistics 13(1): 1–18.
Trost, J. (1978). A renewed social institution: Non-marital cohabitation. Acta Sociologica 21(4): 303–315.