Volume 31 - Article 37 | Pages 1137–1166  

Cohabitation and marriage in Austria: Assessing the individualization thesis across the life course

By Caroline Berghammer, Katrin Fliegenschnee, Eva-Maria Schmidt

References

Austrian Bishops‘ Conference (2012). Amtsblatt der Österreichischen Bischofskonferenz 56. Vienna.

Download reference:

Barbour, R. (2008). Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage.

Download reference:

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage .

Download reference:

Beck, U. and Beck–Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2012). Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften – Perspektiven und Kontroversen einer subjektorientierten Soziologie. In: Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (eds.). Riskante Freiheiten: Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp: 10-39.

Download reference:

Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth (1998). On the Way to a Post-Familial Family: From a Community of Need to Elective Affinities. Theory, Culture & Society 15(3): 53-70.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, Francesco C. and Liefbroer, Aart C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research 15(2–3): 59-75.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., and Robson, K (2001). Focus groups in social research. London: Sage.

Download reference:

Brown, Susan L. (2000). Union Transitions Among Cohabitors: The Significance of Relationship Assessments and Expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(3): 833-846.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brückner, H. and Mayer, K.U. (2005). De–standardization of the life course: what it might mean? And if it means anything, whether it actually took place? In: Macmillan, R. (ed.). The Structure of the Life Course: Standardized? Individualized? Differentiated?. Amsterdam: Elsevier : 27-53.

Download reference:

Bulcroft, Richard, Bulcroft, Kris, Bradley, Karen, and Simpson, Carl (2000). The Management and Production of Risk in Romantic Relationships: A Postmodern Paradox. Journal of Family History 25(1): 63-92.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, Andrew J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848-861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Elzinga, C.H and Liefbroer, A.C (2007). De-standardization of Family-Life Trajectories of Young Adults: A Cross-National Comparison Using Sequence Analysis. European Journal of Population 23(3-4): 225-250.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eurostat (2014). Live births by mother's age at last birthday and legal marital status 2012 [electronic resource]. Luxembourg .

Fischer–Czermak, C. and Beclin, B. (2012). Reformvorschläge für nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaften. Interdisziplinäre Zeitschrift für Familienrecht 7(4): 188-193.

Download reference:

Ghassemi, S. and Kronsteiner–Mann, C. (2009). Zeitverwendung 2008/09. Ein Überblick über geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede. Vienna: Statistics Austria.

Download reference:

Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post–traditional society. In: Beck, U., Giddens, A., and S., Lash (eds.). Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press: 59-109.

Download reference:

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self–identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Download reference:

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Haslinger, Alois (1982). Uneheliche Geburten in Österreich Historische und regionale Muster. Demographische Informationen : 2-34.

Download reference:

Hiekel, N. (2014). The different meanings of cohabitation across Europe: how cohabitors view their unions and differ in their plans and behaviors. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Download reference:

Hitzler, R. and Honer, A (2012). Bastelexistenz. Über subjektive Konsequenzen der Individualisierung. In: Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (eds.). Riskante Freiheiten: Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp: 307-315.

Download reference:

Huang, Penelope M., Smock, Pamela J., Manning, Wendy D., and Bergstrom-Lynch, Cara A. (2011). He Says, She Says: Gender and Cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 32(7): 876-905.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Johnson, Michael P., Caughlin, John P., and Huston, Ted L. (1999). The Tripartite Nature of Marital Commitment: Personal, Moral, and Structural Reasons to Stay Married. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(1): 160-177.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kefalas, Maria J., Furstenberg, Frank F., Carr, Patrick J., and Napolitano, Laura (2011). “Marriage Is More Than Being Together”: The Meaning of Marriage for Young Adults. Journal of Family Issues 32(7): 845-875.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Klotz, J. and Jaschinski, I. (2013). Eheliche und uneheliche Fertilitätsentwicklung: Zusammenwirken von Verhaltens- und Struktureffekten. Eine demographische Analyse zum Anstieg der Unehelichenquote seit 1974. Statistische Nachrichten 68(5): 380-389.

Download reference:

Kytir, Josef and Münz, Rainer (1986). Illegitimität in Österreich. Demographische Informationen : 7-21.

Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, Ron and Surkyn, Johan (1988). Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change. Population and Development Review 14(1): 1-45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lewis, J. (2006). Perceptions of Risk in Intimate Relationships: The Implications for Social Provision. Journal of Social Policy 35(1): 39-57.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, Aart C. and Billari, Francesco C. (2010). Bringing norms back in: a theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour. Population, Space and Place 16(4): 287-305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lois, D. and Kopp, J. (2011). Institutionalisierungsprozesse in Partnerschaften. Erste Ergebnisse auf der Grundlage des Beziehungs– und Familienpanels. In: Brüderl, J., Castiglioni, L., and Schumann, N. (eds.). Partnerschaft, Fertilität und intergenerationale Beziehungen: Ergebnisse der ersten Welle des Beziehungs- und Familienpanels. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag: 105-124.

Download reference:

Manning, Wendy D. and Smock, Pamela J. (2005). Measuring and Modeling Cohabitation: New Perspectives From Qualitative Data. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4): 989-1002.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Merz, Eva-Maria and Liefbroer, Aart C. (2012). The Attitude Toward Voluntary Childlessness in Europe: Cultural and Institutional Explanations. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(3): 587-600.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, David L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology 22(1): 129-152.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mynarska, Monika and Bernardi, Laura (2007). Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation. Demographic Research 16(17): 519-554.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berrington, A., Evans, A., Berghammer, C., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klärner, A., Lappegård, T., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research 31(34): 1043–1078.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, Brienna, Kreyenfeld, Michaela, Sigle-Rushton, Wendy, Keizer, Renske, Lappegård, Trude, Jasilioniene, Aiva, Berghammer, Caroline, and Di Giulio, Paola (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in eleven European countries, 1970s to early 2000s. Population Studies 66(2): 167-182.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, Brienna and Sánchez Gassen, Nora (2012). How Similar Are Cohabitation and Marriage? Legal Approaches to Cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435-467.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, Brienna, Sigle-Rushton, Wendy, Kreyenfeld, Michaela, Lappegård, Trude, Keizer, Renske, and Berghammer, Caroline (2010). The Educational Gradient of Childbearing within Cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775-801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Prskawetz, Alexia, Sobotka, Tomas, Buber-Ennser, Isabella, Engelhardt, Henriette, and Gisser, Richard (2008). Austria: Persistent low fertility since the mid-1980s. Demographic Research 19(12): 293-360.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reneflot, Anne (2006). A gender perspective on preferences for marriage among cohabitating couples. Demographic Research 15(10): 311-328.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rhoades, Galena K., Stanley, Scott M., and Markman, Howard J. (2012). A Longitudinal Investigation of Commitment Dynamics in Cohabiting Relationships. Journal of Family Issues 33(3): 369-390.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rijken, Arieke and Liefbroer, Aart C. (2012). European views of divorce among parents of young children: Understanding cross-national variation. Demographic Research 27(2): 25-52.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, Sharon and Miller, Amanda J. (2011). Waiting to Be Asked: Gender, Power, and Relationship Progression Among Cohabiting Couples. Journal of Family Issues 32(4): 482-506.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Shorter, Edward, Knodel, John, and Van De Walle, Etienne (1971). The Decline of Non-Marital Fertility in Europe, 1880-1940. Population Studies 25(3): 375-393.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. New directions in sociological thinking. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Smart, Carol and Shipman, Beccy (2004). Visions in monochrome: families, marriage and the individualization thesis1. The British Journal of Sociology 55(4): 491-509.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, Tomas and Toulemon, Laurent (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85-138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Statistics Austria (2014). Armutsgefährdung vor und nach sozialen Transfers nach soziodemographischen Merkmalen 2012. Vienna.

Download reference:

Statistics Austria (2014). Bildung in Zahlen 2012/13. Schlüsselindikatoren und Analysen. Vienna.

Download reference:

Statistics Austria (2013). Demographisches Jahrbuch 2012. Vienna.

Download reference:

Statistics Austria (2014). Eheschließungen, Gesamtheiratsrate und mittleres Erstheiratsalter seit 1946. Vienna.

Download reference:

Statistics Austria (2014). Ergebnisse im Überblick: Familien 1985 – 2013. Vienna.

Download reference:

Statistics Austria (2014). Lebendgeborene seit 1991 nach Geschlecht, Legitimität und Bundesland. Vienna.

Download reference:

Statistics Austria (2012). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2012. Vienna.

Download reference:

Syltevik, Liv Johanne (2010). Sense and sensibility: cohabitation in ‘cohabitation land’. The Sociological Review 58(3): 444-462.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van de Kaa, D.J. (1987). Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42(1): 1-57.

Download reference:

Wernhart, G. and Neuwirth, N. (2007). Geschlechterrollenwandel und Familienwerte (1988–2002). Österreich im europäischen Vergleich. Vienna: Austrian Institute for Family Studies (ÖIF Working Paper 54).

Download reference:

Whitehead, B.D. (1997). The divorce culture. New York: Knopf.

Download reference:

Zartler, U. (2012). Das Familienbild des ABGB und die Lebenssituation von Scheidungs– und Nachscheidungsfamilien. Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2(1): 44-56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article