Volume 35 - Article 31 | Pages 929–960  

Gendered transitions to adulthood by college field of study in the United States

By Siqi Han, Dmitry Tumin, Zhenchao Qian

References

Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society 20(4): 441‒464.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Altonji, J.G., Bharadwaj, P., and Lange, F. (2008). Changes in the characteristics of American youth: Implications for adult outcomes. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (w13883).

Download reference:

Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist 55(5): 469‒480.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, J.R. (1981). Differential treatment of females and males in mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 12(1): 40‒53.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blair-Loy, M. (2001). Cultural constructions of family schemas: The case of women finance executives. Gender & Society 15(5): 687‒709.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blau, F.D. and Kahn, L.M. (2013). Female labor supply: Why is the United States falling behind? The American Economic Review 103(3): 251‒256.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bratti, M. and Tatsiramos, K. (2012). The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe. Journal of Population Economics 25(1): 291‒321.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cech, E.A. and Blair-Loy, M. (2010). Perceiving glass ceilings? Meritocratic versus structural explanations of gender inequality among women in science and technology. Social Problems 57(3): 371‒397.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cech, E.A., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S., and Seron, C. (2011). Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering. American Sociological Review 76(5): 641‒666.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ceci, S.J., Williams, W.M., and Barnett, S.M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin 135(2): 218‒261.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Charles, M. and Bradley, K. (2002). Equal but separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education. American Sociological Review 67(4): 573‒599.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cinamon, R.G. (2006). Anticipated work‐family conflict: Effects of gender, self‐efficacy, and family background. The Career Development Quarterly 54(3): 202‒215.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coltrane, S. (2004). Elite careers and family commitment: It’s (still) about gender. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596(1): 214‒220.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davies, S. and Guppy, N. (1997). Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education. Social Forces 75(4): 1417–1438.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eccles, J.S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly 11(2): 135‒172.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eccles, J.S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly 18(4): 585‒609.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Eika, L., Mogstad, M., and Zafar, B. (2014). Educational assortative mating and household income inequality. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (w20271).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Elder, G.H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development 69(1): 1–12.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society 24(2): 149‒166.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P., Allison, P., Li, S., Mark, N., Thompson, J., Budig, M.J., and Sun, H. (2007). Why are some academic fields tipping toward female? The sex composition of US fields of doctoral degree receipt, 1971–2002. Sociology of Education 80(1): 23‒42.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Federal Reserve Bank of New York (2016). The labor market for recent college graduates. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Frech, A. (2014). Pathways to adulthood and changes in health-promoting behaviors. Advances in Life Course Research 19(40–49).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Frome, P. and Eccles, J.S. (1998). Parental effects on adolescents’ academic self-perceptions and interests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(2): 435‒452.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gemici, A. and Wiswall, M. (2014). Evolution of gender differences in post-secondary human capital investments: College majors. International Economic Review 55(1): 23‒56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gerber, T.P. and Cheung, S. (2008). Horizontal stratification in postsecondary education: Forms, explanations, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 299–318.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Glass, J.L., Sassler, S., Levitte, Y., and Michelmore, K.M. (2013). What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces 92(2): 723‒756.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (w11953).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goyette, K.A. and Mullen, A.L. (2006). Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequences of undergraduate field of study. Journal of Higher Education 77(3): 497‒538.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Greenstone, M. and Looney, A. (2012). The marriage gap: The impact of economic and technological change on marriage rates. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Gunter, R. and Stambach, A. (2005). Differences in men and women scientists’ perceptions of workplace climate. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 11(1): 97‒116.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Han, S. (2016). Staying in STEM or changing course: Do natives and immigrants pursue the path of least resistance? Social Science Research 58(165‒183).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hoem, J.M., Neyer, G., and Andersson, G. (2006). Education and childlessness: The relationship between educational field, educational level, and childlessness among Swedish women born in 1955‒59. Demographic Research 14(15): 331‒380.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hunt, J. (2016). Why do women leave science and engineering? ILR Review 69(1): 199‒226.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hyde, J.S., Fennema, E., and Lamon, S.J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 107(2).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Janus, A.L. (2009). Disability and the transition to adulthood. Social Forces 88(1): 99–120.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kanter, R.M. (1993). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

Download reference:

Kanter, R.M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 965‒990.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Koelet, S., de Valk, H., Glorieux, I., Laurijssen, I., and Willaert, D. (2015). The timing of family commitments in the early work career: Work-family trajectories of young adults in Flanders. Demographic Research 32(22): 657‒690.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T. and Rønsen, M. (2005). The multifaceted impact of education on entry into motherhood. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie 21(1): 31–49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Maines, D.R. and Hardesty, M.J. (1987). Temporality and gender: Young adults' career and family plans. Social Forces 66(1): 102‒120.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Martín-García, T. and Baizán, P. (2006). The impact of the type of education and of educational enrolment on first births. European Sociological Review 22(3): 259‒275.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McClendon, D., Kuo, J.C.L., and Raley, R.K. (2014). Opportunities to meet: Occupational education and marriage formation in young adulthood. Demography 51(4): 1319‒1344.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Michelmore, K. and Musick, K. (2014). Fertility patterns of college graduates by field of study, US women born 1960–79. Population Studies 68(3): 359–374.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Moen, P. and Chesley, N. (2008). Toxic job ecologies, time convoys, and work-family conflict: Can families (re)gain control and life-course "fit"? In: Korabik, K., Lero, D.S., and Whitehead, D.L. (eds.). Handbook of work–family integration: Research, theory, and best practices. London: Academic Press: 95‒122.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oesterle, S., Hawkins, J.D., Hill, K.G., and Bailey, J.A. (2010). Men’s and women’s pathways to adulthood and their adolescent precursors. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(5): 1436–1453.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppermann, A. (2014). Exploring the relationship between educational field and transition to parenthood ‒ An analysis of women and men in western Germany. European Sociological Review 30(6): 728‒749.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ridgeway, C.L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Roksa, J. (2005). Double disadvantage or blessing in disguise? Understanding the relationship between college major and employment sector. Sociology of Education 78(3): 207–232.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Roksa, J. and Levey, T. (2010). What can you do with that degree? College major and occupational status of college graduates over time. Social Forces 89(2): 389–415.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, S., Addo, F.R., and Lichter, D.T. (2012). The tempo of sexual activity and later relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(4): 708‒725.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sayer, L.C., England, P., Allison, P., and Kangas, N. (2011). She left, he left: How employment and satisfaction affect men’s and women’s decisions to leave marriages. American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1982‒2018.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schelling, T.C. (2006). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Download reference:

Shauman, K.A. (2009). Are there sex differences in the utilization of educational capital among college-educated workers? Social Science Research 38(3): 535‒571.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Siebens, J. and Ryan, C.L. (2012). Field of bachelor’s degree in the United States: 2009. Washington, D.C.: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey Reports (ACS‒18).

Download reference:

Smock, P.J., Manning, W.D., and Porter, M. (2005). ‘Everything’s there except money’: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 680‒696.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stone, P. (2007). Opting out?: Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Tomaskovic-Devey, D. and Skaggs, S. (2002). Sex segregation, labor process organization, and gender earnings inequality. American Journal of Sociology 108(1): 102‒128.

Weblink:
Download reference:

US Census Bureau (2012). Field of degree and earnings by selected employment characteristics: 2011. Washington, D.C.: Census Bureau.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Bavel, J. (2010). Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: The impact of expected earnings, gender composition, and family attitudes. Demography 47(2): 439–458.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Weisgram, E.S., Bigler, R.S., and Liben, L.S. (2010). Gender, values, and occupational interests among children, adolescents, and adults. Child Development 81(3): 778‒796.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Williams, C.L., Muller, C., and Kilanski, K. (2012). Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender & Society 26(4): 549‒573.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Williams, W.M. and Ceci, S.J. (2012). When scientists choose motherhood. American Scientist 100(2): 138‒145.

Download reference:

Xie, Y. and Goyette, K.A. (2003). Social mobility and the educational choices of Asian Americans. Social Science Research 32(3): 467‒498.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Xie, Y. and Killewald, A. (2012). Is American science in decline? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Xie, Y., Killewald, A., and Near, C. (2016). Between-and within-occupation inequality: The case of high-status professions. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 663(1): 53‒79.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Xie, Y. and Shauman, K.A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Back to the article