Volume 49 - Article 30 | Pages 783–808  

Attitudes toward work and parenthood following family-building transitions in Sweden: Identifying differences by gender and education

By Eva Bernhardt, Frances Goldscheider, Malgorzata Switek

References

Abraham, K.G., Maitland, A., and Bianchi, S.M. (2006). Nonresponse in the American time use survey: Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Public Opinion Quarterly 70(Special Issue 5): 676–703.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, L. (2015). Gender, family life course and attitudes towards divorce. Acta Sociologica 59(1): 51–67.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernhardt, E. and Goldscheider, F. (2006). Gender equality, parenthood attitudes, and first births in Sweden. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 19–39.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bianchi, S.M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity. Demography 37(4): 401–414.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Björklund, A. (1992). Rising female labour force participation and the distribution of family income – the Swedish experience. Acta Sociologica 35(4): 299–309.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A. (2016). A happy ending to a half-century of family change? Population and Development Review 42(1): 121–129.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A. (2018). How inequality drives family formation: The prima facie case. In: Cahn, N., Carbone, J., DeRose, L., and Bradford Wilcox, W. (eds.). Unequal family lives: Causes and consequences in Europe and the Americas. New York: Cambridge University Press: 69–82.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A. (2014). Labor’s love lost: The rise and fall of the working-class family in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Download reference:

Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Corrigal, E.A. and Konrad, A.M. (2007). Gender role attitudes and careers: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles 56: 847–855.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Crompton, R. and Harris, F. (1998). Explaining women’s employment patterns: Orientations to work revisited. British Journal of Sociology 49(1): 118–136.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, S.N. and Greenstein, T.N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 87–105.

Weblink:
Download reference:

de Heer, W. (1999). International response trends: results of an international survey. Journal of Official Statistics 15: 129–142.

Download reference:

Dribe, M. and Stanfors, M. (2009). Does parenthood strengthen a traditional household division of labor? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Marriage and the Family 71: 33–45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society 24(2): 149–166.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). the incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Evertsson, M. (2013). The importance of work: Changing work commitment following the transition to motherhood. Acta Sociologica 56(2): 139–153.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Evertsson, M. and Boye, K. (2018). Fathers on call? A study on the sharing of care work among parents in Sweden. Demographic Research 39(2): 33–60.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Florian, D. (2022). Changing mind, changing plans? Instability of individual gender attitudes and postponement of marriage in Germany. Demographic Research 47(25): 777–792.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gähler, M. and Olàh, L. (2020). Parental divorce, maternal employment, and attitudes to gender equality in Sweden. Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 2020:26.

Download reference:

Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review 96: 1–21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., and Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: Understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F. and Sassler, S. (2018). Family policy, socioeconomic inequality and the gender revolution. In: Cahn, N., Carbone, J., DeRose, L., and Bradford Wilcox, W. (eds.). Unequal family lives: Causes and consequences in Europe and the Americas. New York: Cambridge University Press: 99–215.

Download reference:

Hitlin, S. and Piliavin, J.A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 359–393.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hochschild, A. and Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin Books.

Download reference:

Hofferth, S.L., Pleck, J., Goldscheider, F.K., Curtin, S.C., and Hrapezynski, K. (2013). Changing family structure and men’s motivation for parenthood and parenting in the U.S. In: Cabrera, N.J. and Tamis-LeMonda, C.S. (eds.). Handbook of father involvement: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Milton Park: Taylor and Francis: 57–80.

Download reference:

Holland, J. and Keizer, R. (2015). Family attitudes and fertility timing in Sweden. European Journal of Population 31: 259–285.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hwang, C.P. and Lamb, M.E. (1997). Father involvement in Sweden. A longitudinal study of its stability and correlates. International Journal of Behavioral Development 21(3): 621–632.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalleberg, A.L. and Mastekaasa, A. (2001). Satisfied movers, committed stayers. Work and Occupations 28(2): 183–289.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Katz-Wise, S.L., Priess, H.A., and Hyde, J.S. (2010). Gender role attitudes and behavior across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology 46(1): 18–28.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kaufman, G. (2013). Superdads. How fathers balance work and family in the 21st century. New York: New York University Press.

Download reference:

Kaufman, G., Bernhardt, E., and Goldscheider, F. (2016). Enduring egalitarianism? Family transitions and attitudes toward gender equality in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues 38(13): 1878–1898.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kaufman, G. and Blair, M. (2020). Attitudes toward working mothers and work-oriented fathers in the U.S. Journal of Family Issues 42(3).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Moors, G. (2002). Life course transitions and value orientations. In: The Hague: NIDI/CBGS Publications.

Download reference:

Leszczensky, L. and Wolbring, T. (2022). How to deal with reverse causality using panel data? Sociological Methods and Research 51(2): 837–865.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography 41: 607–627.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McQuillan, J., Greil, A.L., Shreffler, K.M., and Tichenor, V. (2008). The importance of motherhood among women in the contemporary United States. Gender and Society 22(4): 477–496.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Moors, G. (2003). Estimating the reciprocal effect of gender role attitudes and family formation: A log-linear path model with latent variables. European Journal of Population 19: 199–221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Moors, G. (2002). Values and living arrangements: A recursive relationship. In: Waite, L.J. (ed.). The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and the family. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Download reference:

Moors, G. and Bernhardt, E. (2009). Splitting up or getting married? Competing risk analysis of transitions among cohabiting couples in Sweden. Acta Sociologica 52(3): 227–247.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, S.P. and Waite, L.J. (1987). Parenthood and the attitudes of young adults. American Sociological Review 52(4): 541–547.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nauck, B. (2007). Value of children and the framing of fertility: Results from a cross-cultural comparative survey in 10 societies. European Sociological Review 23(5): 615–629.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Olàh, L. and Bernhardt, E. (2008). Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender quality. Demographic Research Special Collection 7. Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe 19(28): 1105–1144.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V. (1970). The female labor force in the United States: Demographic and economic factors governing its growth and changing composition. Berkeley: University of California (Population Monograph Series 5).

Download reference:

Pampel, F. (2011). Cohort change, diffusion, and support for gender egalitarianism in cross-national perspective. Demographic Research 25(21): 667–694.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pampel, F. (2011). Cohort changes in the socio-demographic determinants of gender egalitarianism. Social Forces 89: 961–982.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schwarz, N. and Bohner, G. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In: Tesser, A. and Schwarz, N. (eds.). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Scott, J. (1999). European attitudes to maternal employment. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 19(9/10/11): 144–177.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stanfors, M. and Goldscheider, F. (2017). The forest and the trees: Industrialization, demographic change and the ongoing gender revolution in Sweden and the US 1870–2010. Demographic Research 36(6): 173–226.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sullivan, O., Gershuny, J., and Robinson, J.P. (2018). Stalled or uneven gender revolution? A longterm, processual framework for understanding why change is slow. Journal of Family Theory and Review 10: 263–279.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Switek, M. (2016). Internal migration and life satisfaction: Well-being paths of young adult migrants. Social Indicators Research 125: 191–241.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A., Alwin, D.F., and Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and consequences of sex-role attitudes and attitude change. American Sociological Review 48(2): 211–227.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wanders, F. (2012). Attrition in a Swedish Panel Study. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Demography Unit, YAPS Working Paper 04/12.

Download reference:

Wooldridge, J.M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Download reference:

Back to the article