Volume 50 - Article 32 | Pages 929–966  

Gone and forgotten? Predictors of birth history omissions in India

By Sharan Sharma, Sonalde Desai, Debasis Barik, Om Prakash Sharma

Abstract

Background: Fertility histories are subject to measurement errors such as incorrect birth dates, incorrect birth orders, incorrect sex, and omissions. These errors can bias demographic estimates such as fertility rates and child mortality rates.

Objective: We focus on births missing in fertility histories. We estimate the prevalence of such omissions and study their associated factors.

Methods: We leverage a panel survey (the India Human Development Survey) where the same women were interviewed in two waves several years apart. We compare data across waves and identify omitted births. Omissions in the second wave are modeled as a function of several child, mother, household, and survey interviewer variables. Models are fit separately to omissions reported alive or dead in the first wave.

Results: We conservatively estimate the prevalence of omissions at 4%. A large majority of omitted births are those of dead children, especially infants, with children in poorer households at greater risk of being omitted. For children alive in wave 1, female children are much more likely to be omitted in wave 2 compared to male children. Interviewers can detect respondent behaviors associated with omissions.

Conclusions: Omissions in fertility histories are non-ignorable. They do not randomly occur, and they affect some population subgroups and some interview contexts more than others.

Contribution: We investigate the understudied but important phenomenon of omitted births in fertility histories. We bring attention to possible biases in demographic estimates. We shed light on the survey process and propose strategies for minimizing bias through improved survey design.

Author's Affiliation

• Sharan Sharma - University of Maryland, United States of America EMAIL
• Sonalde Desai - University of Maryland, United States of America EMAIL
• Debasis Barik - National Council of Applied Economic Research, India EMAIL
• Om Prakash Sharma - National Council of Applied Economic Research, India EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Aligning household decision-making with work and education: A comparative analysis of women’s empowerment
Volume 48 - Article 19

Fathers' migration and nutritional status of children in India: Do the effects vary by community context?
Volume 43 - Article 20

Indian paradox: Rising education, declining womens' employment
Volume 38 - Article 31

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

Calculating contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning in low-fertility countries with the Generations and Gender Survey
Volume 49 - Article 21    | Keywords: cross-national study, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), Europe, family planning, Fertility and Family Survey (FFS), Generations and Gender Survey (GGS), longitudinal data, panel data, unplanned births, World Fertility Survey

English fertility heads south: Understanding the recent decline
Volume 45 - Article 29    | Keywords: cross-validation, fertility, panel data, parity progression, period fertility, United Kingdom

Evaluating interviewer manipulation in the new round of the Generations and Gender Survey
Volume 43 - Article 50    | Keywords: data quality, Generations and Gender Survey (GGS), interviewer effects, retrospective histories, survey methods

Interviewer effects on patterns of nonresponse: Evaluating the impact on the reasons for contraceptive nonuse in the Indonesia and the Philippines DHS
Volume 39 - Article 14    | Keywords: contraceptive use, data quality, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), Indonesia, interviewer effects, multilevel model

The wage penalty for motherhood: Evidence on discrimination from panel data and a survey experiment for Switzerland
Volume 37 - Article 56    | Keywords: division of household work, employers, motherhood, motherhood penalty, panel data, wage discrimination