Marie-Hélène Lussier
Robert Bourbeau
Robert Choinière

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol18/19/

Bookmark this page
Send this article to a friend

	Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file. Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.

Abstract
After studying the epidemiologic transition’s situation in Canada, it is determined that the delimitation of temporal stages within the epidemiologic transition as put forward by Omran (1971, 1998), Olshansky and Ault (1986), Rogers and Hackenberg (1987) and Olshansky et al. (1998) does not suit the Canadian evolution. Many of the researchers’ postulates on the epidemiologic transition were not confirmed, which leads us to assert that, since 1958, the epidemiologic transition is best described as an evolution process rather than specific stages confined within time limits.

Author's affiliation
Marie-Hélène Lussier
Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, United States of America
Robert Bourbeau
Université de Montréal, Canada
Robert Choinière
Institut National de santé publique du Québec, Canada

Keywords
Canada, causes of death, chronic diseases, epidemiologic transition, mortality, new variants of the theory

Word count (Main text)
7208

Other Articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)

[2-2] Mortality statistics for the oldest-old: an evaluation of Canadian data

Most recent Similar Articles (in Demographic Research)

	[19-35] An integrated approach to cause-of-death analysis: cause-deleted life tables and decompositions of life expectancy (mortality, causes of death)
	[14-13] Survival differences among the oldest old in Sardinia: who, what, where, and why? (mortality, causes of death)
	[7-5] The Cancer Transition in Japan since 1951 (mortality, epidemiologic transition)
	[3-12] Sex differentials in survival in the Canadian population, 1921-1997 (mortality, Canada)
	[2-2] Mortality statistics for the oldest-old: an evaluation of Canadian data (mortality, Canada)