© 1999 - 2012
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

Multi-residence in France and Australia
Why count them? What is at stake? Double counting and actual family situations

References
View the references of this article
Services
Bookmark this page
Send this article to a friend
Download to Citation Manager
file RIS format
file BibTeX format
Citations and Similar Articles
PubMed
Articles by Laurent Toulemon
Articles by Sophie Pennec
Google Scholar
Articles by Laurent Toulemon
Articles by Sophie Pennec
Article and its Citations
 

Laurent Toulemon
Sophie Pennec

 
VOLUME 23 - ARTICLE 1
PAGES 1 - 40
Date Received: 26 Jun 2009
Date Published: 2 Jul 2010

http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol23/1/

doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.1
   
PDF file Click the icon to view and/or download the PDF file.
Once you are in the PDF file, use your browser back button to return to this page.

Abstract

With the increasing diversity of family situations, growing numbers of people, including children, have more than one home. In France, nearly 4% of inhabitants are likely to be counted twice in surveys; while in Australia, the proportion is less than 2%. Taking into account the possibility that a single individual could have multiple residences is necessary not only to avoid double counting, but also to accurately describe the family situations of adults and children. In this paper, we first estimate the proportion of people living in two dwellings and then describe the consequences of these two-home situations for basic estimates of family situations. Our analysis is based on two large-scale surveys: the 2004 EU-SILC in France and the 2001 HILDA in Australia. A striking result is that, in France, half of all children who are counted as living with their fathers are in fact dividing their time between the homes of separated parents.

Author's affiliation
Laurent Toulemon
Institut national d´études démographiques (INED), France
Sophie Pennec
Institut national d´études démographiques (INED), France

Keywords
Australia, commuters between households, double counting, EU-SILC, family situation, France, household members grid, multi-residence, sample bias, weighting

Word count (Main text)
10792

Other articles by the same author/authors (in Demographic Research)
file[24-7] Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The first "YES"
file[19-16] France: High and stable fertility
file[19-6] Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe
file[19-2] Summary and general conclusions: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
file [25-12] Occupational inequalities in health expectancies in France in the early 2000s: Unequal chances of reaching and living retirement in good health (France)
file [25-6] The contribution of increases in family benefits to Australia’s early 21st-century fertility increase: An empirical analysis (Australia)
file [23-28] Revisiting the mortality of France and Italy with the multiple-cause-of-death approach (France)
file [23-8] Model migration schedules incorporating student migration peaks (Australia)
file [22-34] Understanding the long term effects of family policies on fertility: The diffusion of different family models in France and Germany (France)

[ Back to previous page ]