Volume 26 - Article 17 | Pages 409-448

Space, race, and poverty: Spatial inequalities in walkable neighborhood amenities?

By Dustin T. Duncan, Jared Aldstadt, John Whalen, Kellee White, Marcia C. Castro, David R. Williams

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:13 Sep 2011
Date published:15 May 2012
Word count:6960
Keywords:neighborhood amenities/built environment, neighborhood poverty, neighborhood racial composition, racial/socioeconomic segregation, spatial demography, United States
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection “Spatial Demography” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/13/


Background: Multiple and varied benefits have been suggested for increased neighborhood walkability. However, spatial inequalities in neighborhood walkability likely exist and may be attributable, in part, to residential segregation.

Objective: Utilizing a spatial demographic perspective, we evaluated potential spatial inequalities in walkable neighborhood amenities across census tracts in Boston, MA (US).

Methods: The independent variables included minority racial/ethnic population percentages and percent of families in poverty. Walkable neighborhood amenities were assessed with a composite measure. Spatial autocorrelation in key study variables were first calculated with the Global Moran's I statistic. Then, Spearman correlations between neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics and walkable neighborhood amenities were calculated as well as Spearman correlations accounting for spatial autocorrelation. We fit ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and spatial autoregressive models when appropriate as a final step.

Results: Significant positive spatial autocorrelation was found in neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics (e.g. census tract percent Black), but not walkable neighborhood amenities or in the OLS regression residuals. Spearman correlations between neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics and walkable neighborhood amenities were not statistically significant, nor were neighborhood socio-demographic characteristics significantly associated with walkable neighborhood amenities in OLS regression models.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that there is residential segregation in Boston and that spatial inequalities do not necessarily show up using a composite measure.

Comments: Future research in other geographic areas (including international contexts) and using different definitions of neighborhoods (including small-area definitions) should evaluate if spatial inequalities are found using composite measures, but also should use measures of specific neighborhood amenities.

Author's Affiliation

Dustin T. Duncan - Harvard University, United States of America [Email]
Jared Aldstadt - State University of New York at Buffalo, United States of America [Email]
John Whalen - State University of New York at Buffalo, United States of America [Email]
Kellee White - University of South Carolina, United States of America [Email]
Marcia C. Castro - Harvard University, United States of America [Email]
David R. Williams - Harvard University, United States of America [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» The potential impact of intermarriage on the population decline of the Parsis of Mumbai, India
Volume 25 - Article 17

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Fertility change in the American Indian and Alaska Native population, 1980–2010
Volume 37 - Article 1    | Keywords: United States

» The welfare state and demographic dividends
Volume 36 - Article 48    | Keywords: United States

» Setting the census household into its urban context: Visualizations from 19th-century Montreal
Volume 36 - Article 46    | Keywords: spatial demography

» How kinship systems and welfare regimes shape leaving home: A comparative study of the United States, Germany, Taiwan, and China
Volume 36 - Article 38    | Keywords: United States

» The timing of marriage vis-à-vis coresidence and childbearing in Europe and the United States
Volume 36 - Article 20    | Keywords: United States