Volume 26 - Article 3 | Pages 63-98

Couple disagreement about short-term fertility desires in Austria: Effects on intentions and contraceptive behaviour

By Maria Rita Testa

Print this page  

 

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179-211.

Weblink doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Ajzen, I. (2010). Fertility intentions and the theory of planned behaviour. Paper presented at the International Conference on Reproductive Decision-making in a Macro-Micro Perspective, Vienna, December 2-3, 2010.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Barret, G. and Wellings, K. (2002). What is a ‘planned’ pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Social Science & Medicine 55(4): 545-557.

Weblink doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00187-3
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Beach, L.R., Hope, B.D., and Campbell, F.L. (1982). The expectation-threshold model of reproductive decision making. Population and Environment 5(2): 95-108.

Weblink doi:10.1007/BF01367489
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Becker, S. (1996). Couples and reproductive health: A review of couple studies. Studies in Family Planning 27(6): 291-306.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Beckman, L.J. (1983). Communication, power, and the influence of social network in couple decisions on fertility. In: Bulatao, R.A. and Lee, R.D. (eds.). Determinants of fertility in developing countries, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press: 415-443.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Beckman, L.J. (1984). Husbands’ and wives’ relative influence on fertility decisions and outcomes. Population and Environment: Behavioral and Social Issues 7(3): 182-197.

Weblink doi:10.1007/BF01255488
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Berrington, A. (2004). Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couples’ fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Southampton: Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, Applications and Policy Working Paper A04/09.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Billari, F., Philipov, D., and Testa, M.R. (2009). Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population 25(4): 439-465.

Weblink doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9187-9
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Brant, R. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics 46(4): 1171-1178.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2532457
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Buber-Ennser, I. (2003). The influence of the distribution of household and childrearing tasks between men and women on childbearing intentions in Austria. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 1: 165-180.

Weblink doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2003s165
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Bulatao, R.A. (1981). Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions. Demography 18(1): 1-25.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2061046
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Coombs, L.C. and Chang, M.C. (1981). Do husbands and wives agree? Fertility attitudes and later behavior. Population and Environment 4(2): 109-127.

Weblink doi:10.1007/BF01255801
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Corijn, M., Liefbroer, A.C., and De Jong Gierveld, J. (1996). It takes two to tango, doesn’t it? The influence of couple characteristics on the timing of the birth of the first child. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58(1): 117-126.

Weblink doi:10.2307/353381
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Davidson, A.R. and Beach, L.R. (1981). Error patterns in the prediction of fertility behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 11(6): 475-488.

Weblink doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981.tb00837.x
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Fried, E.S., Hofferth, S.L., and Udry, J.R. (1980). Parity-specific and two-sex utility models of reproductive intentions. Demography 17(1): 1-11.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2060959
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Fried, E.S. and Udry, J.R. (1979). Wives’ and husbands’ expected costs and benefits of childbearing predictors of pregnancy. Biodemography and Social Biology 26(4): 265-274.

Weblink doi:10.1080/19485565.1979.9988385
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Goldstein, J., Lutz, W., and Testa, M.R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5-6): 479-496.

Weblink doi:10.1023/B:POPU.0000020962.80895.4a
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Jansen, M. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2006). Couple’s attitudes, childbirth, and the division of labor. Journal of Family Issues 27(11): 1487-1511.

Weblink doi:10.1177/0192513X06291038
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Kamo, Y. (2000). “He said, she said”: Assessing discrepancies in husbands’ and wives’ reports on the division of household labor. Social Science Research 29(4): 459-476.

Weblink doi:10.1006/ssre.2000.0674
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R.A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(4): 139-158.

Weblink doi:10.1257/jep.10.4.139
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427-439.

Weblink doi:10.1257/jep.10.4.139
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Miller, W.B. (1986). Proception: An important fertility behavior. Demography 23(4): 579-594.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2061352
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Miller, W.B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 120(2): 223-258.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Miller, W.B. (2011). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research, and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 75-98.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Miller, W.B. and Pasta, D.J. (1994). The psychology of child timing: A measurement instrument and a model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24(3): 218-250.

Weblink doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00580.x
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Miller, W.B. and Pasta, D.J. (1996). Couple disagreement: Effects on the formation and implementation of fertility decisions. Personal Relationships 3(3): 307-336.

Weblink doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00119.x
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Miller, W.B. and Pasta, D.J. (2002). The motivational substrate of unintended and unwanted pregnancy. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research 7(1): 1-29.

Weblink doi:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2002.tb00073.x
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Miller, W.B., Severy, L.J., and Pasta, D.J. (2004). A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies 58(2): 193-205.

Weblink doi:10.1080/0032472042000213712
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Morgan, S.P. (1981). Intention and uncertainty at later stages of childbearing: The United States 1965 and 1970. Demography 18(3): 267-285.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2060997
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Morgan, S.P. (1985). Individual and couple intentions for more children: A research note. Demography 22(1): 125-132.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2060991
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Namboodiri, N.K. (1972). Some observations on the economic framework for fertility analysis. Population Studies 26(2): 185-206.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2173577
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Philipov, D. (2011). Theories on fertility intentions: A demographer’s perspective. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 37-45.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Prskawetz, A., Sobotka, T., Buber-Ennser, I., Engelhardt, H., and Gisser, R. (2008). Austria: Persistent low fertility since the mid-1980s. Demographic Research 19(12): 293-360.

Weblink doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.12
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Rille-Pfeiffer, C. (2009). Kinder – jetzt, später oder nie? Generatives Verhalten und Kinderwunsch in Österreich, Schweden und Spanien. Vienna: Budrich UniPress, Schriftenreihe des Österreichischen Instituts für Familienforschung (ÖIF) 21.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Rindfuss, R.R., Morgan, S.P., and Swicegood, G. (1988). First births in America: Changes in the timing of parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Ryder, N.B. (1973). A critique of the National Fertility Study. Demography 10(4): 495-506.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2060877
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Testa, M.R., Cavalli, L., and Rosina, A. (2011). Couples’ childbearing behaviour in Italy: Which of the partners is leading it? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 157-178.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography 34(3): 343-354.

Weblink doi:10.2307/3038288
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Thomson, E. and Hoem, J.M. (1998). Couple childbearing plans and births in Sweden. Demography 35(3): 315-322.

Weblink doi:10.2307/3004039
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Thomson, E., McDonald, E., and Bumpass, L.L. (1990). Fertility desires and fertility: Hers, his, and theirs. Demography 27(4): 579-588.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2061571
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Townes, B.D., Beach, L.R., Campbell, F.L., and Wood, R.L. (1980). Family building: A social psychological study of fertility decisions. Population and Environment 3(3-4): 210-220.

Weblink doi:10.1007/BF01255339
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Voas, D. (2003). Conflicting preferences: A reason fertility tends to be too high or too low. Population and Development Review 29(4): 627-646.

Weblink doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00627.x
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Williams, R. and Thomson, E. (1985). Can spouses be trusted? A look at husband/wife proxy reports. Demography 22(1): 115-123.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2060990
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Zabin, L.S., Huggins, G.R., Emerson, M.R., and Cullins, V.E. (2000). Partner effects on a woman’s intention to conceive: ‘Not with this partner’. Family Planning Perspectives 32(1): 39-45.

Weblink doi:10.2307/2648147
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX