Volume 28 - Article 27 | Pages 763-792

The power of the interviewer: A qualitative perspective on African survey data collection

By Sara Randall, Ernestina Coast, Natacha Compaore, Philippe Antoine

Print this page  Send this article to a friend  Twitter

 

 
Date received:03 Aug 2012
Date published:09 Apr 2013
Word count:8737
Keywords:household, interviewers, interviews, Sub-Saharan Africa, survey
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.27
 

Abstract

Background: African censuses and surveys remain dependent on interviewers for data collection. Data quality is assured through training and supervision. Many survey concepts are difficult to translate into African languages and some, such as "household", may have multiple criteria which are not fulfilled by everyone, leading interviewers to prioritise different criteria. Some questions introduce unfamiliar ideas which require considerable negotiation by interviewers to obtain acceptable answers.

Objective: To identify key stages in the data collection process and domains where interviewer judgement and interviewer-respondent social dynamics play a substantial role in determining who is included in household surveys, and in shaping responses to questions.

Methods: We analyse published definitions, enumerator manuals and qualitative interview data with households, interviewers, supervisors, trainers, survey organisers and analysts along the chain of data production and use in Tanzania, Uganda, Senegal and Burkina Faso.

Results: Despite comprehensive training manuals and definitions, interviewers influence who is included in, and excluded from surveys. Interviewer versatility needs to include both persuasive social skills and an ability to follow precise wording. In Africa, where survey concepts are often different from local concepts and where interviewers are socio-economically distant from respondents, these persuasive social skills are required throughout the interview process with unknown impact on the data produced. Language diversity is a major barrier to harmonisation.

Conclusions: To improve survey data validity more effort should be made to understand the influence of interviewers on data in low-income settings.

Comments: This submission covers important issues for demographers undertaking secondary analysis of African surveys, especially those without fieldwork experience.

Author's Affiliation

Sara Randall - University College London, United Kingdom [Email]
Ernestina Coast - London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom [Email]
Natacha Compaore - ISSP, International [Email]
Philippe Antoine - Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), France [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Disciplining anthropological demography
Volume 16 - Article 16

» Qualitative data in demography: The sound of silence and other problems
Volume 11 - Article 3

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a Better Understanding of Relationships and Processes in the Life Course
Volume 17 - Article 14    | Keywords: household, survey

» Anticipatory child fostering and household economic security in Malawi
Volume 30 - Article 40    | Keywords: Sub-Saharan Africa

» Household ecology and out-migration among ethnic Karen along the Thai-Myanmar border
Volume 30 - Article 39    | Keywords: household

» Does the orphan disadvantage "spill over"? An analysis of whether living in an area with a higher concentration of orphans is associated with children’s school enrollment in sub-Saharan Africa
Volume 28 - Article 40    | Keywords: Sub-Saharan Africa

» The more you learn the less you know? Interpretive ambiguity across three modes of qualitative data
Volume 28 - Article 33    | Keywords: interviews