Volume 28 - Article 33 | Pages 951-980

The more you learn the less you know? Interpretive ambiguity across three modes of qualitative data

By Nicole Angotti, Amy Kaler

Print this page  Send this article to a friend  Twitter

 

 
Date received:06 Apr 2012
Date published:14 May 2013
Word count:6894
Keywords:Africa, AIDS/HIV, ethnography, focus groups, HIV testing, interviews, Malawi, qualitative methods, research mindfulness
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.33
 

Abstract

Background: Researchers across disciplines face a similar challenge ensuring our methods can give us valid, usable answers to our questions. But what happens when multiple strategies of inquiry give us different answers to the same research question? We explore this issue through three different modes of qualitative inquiry - interviews, focus groups, and participant observation - oriented around local attitudes to HIV testing.

Objective: We introduce the notion of "research awareness" - the extent to which participants are continuously reminded that they are taking part in a research project, which is a function of the mode of research itself. We hypothesize that as participants’ research-awareness decreases across modes, from interviews to focus groups to participant observation, the proportion of statements that conform to officially sanctioned normative discourse about HIV/AIDS will decrease and the proportion expressing non-normative or counter-normative ideas will increase.

Methods: We tabulated positive and negative references to three themes - knowing one’s HIV status, counseling messages, and antiretroviral treatment - across the three qualitative modes.

Results: The distribution is non-uniform, with favorable responses to testing themes predominating in interviews, mixed responses in the focus groups, and negative responses predominating in the observational data. At least a third of references to testing across all three modes, however, do not support officially sanctioned normative discourse.

Conclusions: Researchers who use mixed methods approaches for triangulation should consider the influence of research-awareness on their methods. These situational specifics are crucial for understanding the applicability of research to real life. Substantively, our study revealed a robust level of ambivalence about HIV testing despite normative discourses supporting it at local and global levels.

Author's Affiliation

Nicole Angotti - American University, United States of America [Email]
Amy Kaler - University of Alberta, Canada [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Asking God about the date you will die: HIV testing as a zone of uncertainty in rural Malawi
Volume 23 - Article 32

» "My Girlfriends Could Fill A Yanu-Yanu Bus": Rural Malawian Men's Claims About Their Own Serostatus
Special Collection 1 - Article 11

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Reporting on first sexual experience: The importance of interviewer-respondent interaction
Volume 22 - Article 11    | Keywords: Africa, AIDS/HIV, Malawi, qualitative methods

» HIV/AIDS and time allocation in rural Malawi
Volume 24 - Article 27    | Keywords: Africa, AIDS/HIV, Malawi

» Children’s school participation and HIV/AIDS in rural Malawi: The role of parental knowledge and perceptions
Volume 19 - Article 45    | Keywords: Africa, AIDS/HIV, HIV testing

» Hotspots and Coldspots: Household and village-level variation in orphanhood prevalence in rural Malawi
Volume 19 - Article 32    | Keywords: Africa, AIDS/HIV, Malawi

» Comparing, Contextualizing, and Conceptualizing: Enhancing Quantitative Data on Women's Situation in Rural Africa
Special Collection 1 - Article 5    | Keywords: Africa, Malawi, qualitative methods

Articles

»Volume 28

 

Citations

 

 

Similar Articles

 

 

Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID