Volume 29 - Article 18 | Pages 473-506

Explaining the rural-urban gap in infant mortality in India

By Nandita Saikia, Abhishek Singh, Domantas Jasilionis, Faujdar Ram

Print this page  Send this article to a friend  Twitter

 

 
Date received:30 Apr 2012
Date published:11 Sep 2013
Word count:6447
Keywords:decomposition, India, infant mortality, National Family Health Surveys, rural, urban
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.18
 

Abstract

Background: Prior studies suggest that infant mortality in rural areas of India is substantially higher than in urban areas. However, little is known about the determinants explaining such excess of rural mortality.

Objective: This study systematically assesses the role of socioeconomic and maternal and child health (MCH) care-related programme factors in explaining the rural-urban gap in infant mortality during the past two decades.

Methods: Long-term changes in rural and urban infant mortality were assessed using Sample Registration System (SRS) data. Binary logistic regression was used to analyse the association between socioeconomic and MCH care-related programme factors and infant mortality using data from the three rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS). Fairlie's decomposition technique was applied to understand the relative contribution of different co-variates to the rural-urban gap in infant mortality.

Results: Relative inequality between rural and urban India has increased over time. The rural-urban gap in infant mortality can be largely explained by the distributions of the co-variates in rural and urban area. The largest part of the rural disadvantage in infant mortality is attributable to the underlying disadvantage in household wealth and maternal education, whereas breastfeeding and knowledge of Oral Rehydration Solution has contributed to narrowing the gap. The share of women using modern contraceptive methods and the percentage of fully vaccinated children in the community have also contributed to widening the rural-urban gap in infant mortality.

Conclusions: In addition to strengthening MCH programmes in rural areas, substantial efforts must also be made to improve household wealth and female education levels.

Author's Affiliation

Nandita Saikia - Institute of Economic Growth, University Enclave, Delhi, India [Email]
Abhishek Singh - International Institute for Population Sciences, India [Email]
Domantas Jasilionis - Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Germany [Email]
Faujdar Ram - International Institute for Population Sciences, India [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Changes in educational differentials in old-age mortality in Finland and Sweden between 1971-1975 and 1996-2000
Volume 26 - Article 19

» Estimates of mortality and population changes in England and Wales over the two World Wars
Volume 13 - Article 16

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Premarital cohabitation and divorce: Support for the "Trial Marriage" Theory?
Volume 23 - Article 31    | Keywords: rural, urban

» High Suburban Fertility: Evidence from Four Northern European Countries
Volume 21 - Article 31    | Keywords: rural, urban

» Does early childbearing and a sterilization-focused family planning programme in India fuel population growth?
Volume 20 - Article 28    | Keywords: India, National Family Health Surveys

» Attitudes towards abortion and contraception in rural and urban Burkina Faso
Volume 17 - Article 2    | Keywords: rural, urban

» Maternal longevity is associated with lower infant mortality
Volume 31 - Article 42    | Keywords: infant mortality