Volume 30 - Article 6 | Pages 187-226

Pathways to marriage and cohabitation in Central America

By Kathryn Grace, Stuart Sweeney

Print this page  Send this article to a friend  Twitter

 

 
Date received:14 Mar 2013
Date published:22 Jan 2014
Word count:8500
Keywords:adolescent transition, Central America, cohabitation, family formation, life course, marriage
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.6
 

Abstract

Background: The notion that increasing prevalence of cohabitation relative to marriage, and increasing age at first marriage are part of a broader shift in societal norms -- a second demographic transition -- is now well supported by studies focused on US and European populations. Recent research points to the similarly high prevalence of cohabitation in Latin America as perhaps signaling the diffusion of modern ideals and norms about union formation. In Central America this is unlikely to be the case given the long history and enduring acceptance of cohabitation that is unrelated to modern ideals. While there are studies that have documented this history and current prevalence, there is no research examining the intersecting life course pathways from adolescence through early adulthood that lead to marriage or cohabitation. This is not surprising given that available data for Central American countries are not ideally suited to studying the process.

Methods: We use retrospective questions from large, nationally representative Central American surveys (Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua) to establish the timing of marriage or cohabitation and events that are closely tied to union formation. We utilize additive causespecific hazard models, and predicted transition probabilities based on selected covariate pathways, to study the competing risks of exiting from the status of never in union.

Results: Our results identify sexual activity and pregnancy as the primary drivers of union formation and indicate that education serves as a protective factor against union formation. We also find distinct differences among countries and a strong indication that cohabitations are less stable unions.

Author's Affiliation

Kathryn Grace - University of Utah, United States of America [Email]
Stuart Sweeney - University of California at Santa Barbara, United States of America [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Contraceptive use and intent in Guatemala
Volume 23 - Article 12

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Digit preferences in marriage formation in Sweden: Millennium marriages and birthday peaks
Volume 30 - Article 25    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» Declining health disadvantage of non-marital children: Explanation of the trend in the Czech Republic 1990-2010
Volume 29 - Article 25    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» Disentangling how educational expansion did not increase women's age at union formation in Latin America from 1970 to 2000
Volume 28 - Article 3    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» Age, relationship status, and the planning status of births
Volume 23 - Article 13    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» Men´s and women´s economic activity and first marriage: Jews in Israel, 1987-1995
Volume 22 - Article 29    | Keywords: life course, marriage

Articles

 

Citations

 

 

Similar Articles

 

 

Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID