Volume 30 - Article 7 | Pages 227-252

Self-Reported Versus Performance-Based Measures of Physical Function: Prognostic Value for Survival

By Noreen Goldman, Dana Glei, Luis Rosero-Bixby, Shu-Ti Chiou, Maxine Weinstein

Print this page  Send this article to a friend  Twitter

 

 
Date received:22 Apr 2013
Date published:23 Jan 2014
Word count:7074
Keywords:disability, mortality, performance assessments, physical function, self report
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.7
 

Abstract

Background: Although previous studies have indicated that performance assessments strongly predict future survival, few have evaluated the incremental value in the presence of controls for self-reported activity and mobility limitations.

Objective: We assess and compare the added value of four tests -- walking speed, chair stands, grip strength, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) -- for predicting all-cause mortality.

Methods: Using population-based samples of older adults in Costa Rica (n = 2290, aged 60+) and Taiwan (n = 1219, aged 53+), we estimate proportional hazards models of mortality for an approximate five-year period. Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves are used to assess the prognostic value of each performance assessment.

Results: Self-reported measures of physical limitations contribute substantial gains in mortality prediction, whereas performance-based assessments yield modest incremental gains. PEF provides the greatest added value, followed by grip strength. Our results suggest that including more than two performance assessments may provide little improvement in mortality prediction.

Conclusions: PEF and grip strength are often simpler to administer in home interview settings, impose less of a burden on some respondents, and, in the presence of self-reported limitations, appear to be better predictors of mortality than do walking speed or chair stands.

Comments: Being unable to perform the test is often a strong predictor of mortality, but these indicators are not well-defined. Exclusion rates vary by the specific task and are likely to depend on the underlying demographic, health, social and cultural characteristics of the sample.

Author's Affiliation

Noreen Goldman - Princeton University, United States of America [Email]
Dana Glei - Georgetown University, United States of America [Email]
Luis Rosero-Bixby - University of Costa Rica, Costa Rica [Email]
Shu-Ti Chiou - Bureau of Health Promotion, Taiwan [Email]
Maxine Weinstein - Georgetown University, United States of America [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Is Latin America starting to retreat from early and universal childbearing?
Volume 20 - Article 9

» The effects of war losses on mortality estimates for Italy: A first attempt
Volume 13 - Article 15

» Introduction to the Special Collection “Human Mortality over Age, Time, Sex, and Place: The 1st HMD Symposium”
Volume 13 - Article 10

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» An empirical analysis of the importance of controlling for unobserved heterogeneity when estimating the income-mortality gradient
Volume 31 - Article 30    | Keywords: mortality

» A matrix approach to the statistics of longevity in heterogeneous frailty models
Volume 31 - Article 19    | Keywords: mortality

» Age patterns of racial/ethnic/nativity differences in disability and physical functioning in the United States
Volume 31 - Article 17    | Keywords: disability

» Factors responsible for mortality variation in the United States: A latent variable analysis
Volume 31 - Article 2    | Keywords: mortality

» The pace of aging: Intrinsic time scales in demography
Volume 30 - Article 57    | Keywords: mortality