Volume 36 - Article 55 | Pages 1703-1720

From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness

By Marika Jalovaara, Anette Eva Fasang

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:19 Dec 2016
Date published:25 May 2017
Word count:2445
Keywords:childlessness, cohabitation, fertility, Finland, marriage, sequence analysis, union trajectories
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.55
 

Abstract

Background: Childlessness has increased in many European countries. Partnerships and parenthood are obviously closely related, but there is relatively little knowledge on how childlessness is linked to contemporary union dynamics that involve high rates of separation and unmarried cohabitation.

Objective: To situate (biological) childlessness in longitudinal dynamics of union formation and stability, we take a life-course approach to union trajectories that consist of states entered via the formation and dissolution of cohabitations and marriages. Concretely, we identify groups of similar union trajectories of individuals between the ages of 18 and 39 who are childless at age 42.

Methods: We analyse register data on Finnish men and women born in 1969 and 1970 (childless N=3,241) with sequence, cluster, and multinomial logistic regression methods.

Results: Four clusters of typical union trajectories were identified among the childless and assigned these labels: 1) Never Partnered (45%), characterized by never having entered a coresidential partnership, or just having entered a cohabitation near age 40; 2) Briefly Cohabited (25%), characterized by mostly living single after a brief cohabitation spell; 3) Cohabitors, Often Serial (19%), marked by typically discontinuous cohabitation; and 4) Married (11%). The Never-Partnered cluster is male-dominated. Men with a rural background and less-educated men and women are overrepresented among the Never-Partnered childless.

Conclusions: For the great majority of the childless in our study cohorts, union trajectories are marked by either the (almost) complete absence of coresidential unions or fragmentary cohabitation histories.

Contribution: The study contributes to the literature by showing that union histories, including never partnering as well as cohabitation instability, are key for understanding contemporary childlessness.

Comments: We recommend that you read the paper on screen or print a color version.

Author's Affiliation

Marika Jalovaara - Turun Yliopisto (University of Turku), Finland [Email]
Anette Eva Fasang - Humboldt-Universit├Ąt zu Berlin, Germany [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?
Volume 33 - Article 44

» Homogamy in socio-economic background and education, and the dissolution of cohabiting unions
Volume 30 - Article 65

» Does his paycheck also matter?: The socioeconomic resources of co-residential partners and entry into parenthood in Finland
Volume 28 - Article 31

» Recent fertility patterns of Finnish women by union status: A descriptive account
Volume 28 - Article 14

» A review of the antecedents of union dissolution
Volume 23 - Article 10

» Socioeconomic differentials in divorce risk by duration of marriage
Volume 7 - Article 16

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?
Volume 33 - Article 44    | Keywords: cohabitation, Finland, marriage, sequence analysis

» Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK
Volume 33 - Article 12    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, sequence analysis

» Two period measures for comparing the fertility of marriage and cohabitation
Volume 32 - Article 14    | Keywords: cohabitation, fertility, marriage

» Cohabiting unions in France and West Germany: Transitions to first birth and first marriage
Volume 7 - Article 18    | Keywords: cohabitation, fertility, marriage

» On the normative foundations of marriage and cohabitation: Results from group discussions in eastern and western Germany
Volume 36 - Article 53    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage