Volume 27 - Article 17 | Pages 455–486

The intermediate effect of geographic proximity on intergenerational support: A comparison of France and Bulgaria

By Leen Heylen, Dimitri Mortelmans, Maarten Hermans, Kim Boudiny

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:24 Jan 2011
Date published:05 Oct 2012
Word count:7503
Keywords:geographical proximity, GGS, intergenerational solidarity
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection “Intergenerational family ties in Europe: Multiple linkages between individuals, families and social contexts” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/11/


Background: The geographic proximity of parents and adult children is a key element of intergenerational solidarity. Many studies have identified geographical distance as an important determinant of intergenerational support: living nearby increases the amount of mutual support provided. It can, however, also be regarded as a dimension of intergenerational solidarity: the current degree of proximity is the result of past migration decisions made by both generations, in which present and future care demands potentially played a key role.

Objective: We take this endogenous nature of geographical distance into account by examining the indirect effect of the determinants of the actual level of support through geographical distance. Both upward support (personal care provided to mother) and downward support (help with childcare received from mother) are considered.

Methods: Path analyses are performed on data from the Generations and Gender Survey for France and Bulgaria using a general latent-variable modelling framework in multiple-group models.

Results: In addition to strongly affecting the level of support provided and received, geographical distance itself is affected by several individual and family-related variables, which in turn have an indirect effect on the level of intergenerational support. The results suggest that proximity can be used as an adaptive strategy: e.g., working adult children in France receive more help with childcare because of their greater proximity to their mothers. Having a greater care need may have triggered this choice of residence. Similarly, single parents with no partner to rely on tend to live closer to their mothers, and therefore receive more help.

Conclusions: Geographic proximity can be considered a latent form of solidarity that functions as a mediator between background factors and manifest, functional solidarity.

Author's Affiliation

Leen Heylen - Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium [Email]
Dimitri Mortelmans - Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium [Email]
Maarten Hermans - Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium [Email]
Kim Boudiny - Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Endogamy and relationship dissolution: Does unmarried cohabitation matter?
Volume 47 - Article 17

» Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe
Volume 37 - Article 37

» The socioeconomic determinants of repartnering after divorce or separation in Belgium
Volume 36 - Article 58

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Proximity to mother over the life course in the United States: Overall patterns and racial differences
Volume 45 - Article 23    | Keywords: geographical proximity

» Generations and Gender Programme Wave 1 data collection: An overview and assessment of sampling and fieldwork methods, weighting procedures, and cross-sectional representativeness
Volume 34 - Article 18    | Keywords: GGS

» Reliability of retrospective event histories within the German Generations and Gender Survey: The role of interviewer and survey design factors
Volume 34 - Article 11    | Keywords: GGS

» What is your couple type? Gender ideology, housework sharing, and babies
Volume 32 - Article 30    | Keywords: GGS

» Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1
Volume 32 - Article 24    | Keywords: GGS