Volume 27 - Article 7 | Pages 167–200
Living arrangements, intergenerational support types and older adult loneliness in Eastern and Western Europe
Date received: | 05 May 2011 |
Date published: | 02 Aug 2012 |
Word count: | 7180 |
Keywords: | coresidence, couples, living alone, living arrangements, loneliness, older adults, support types |
DOI: | 10.4054/DemRes.2012.27.7 |
Weblink: | You will find all publications in this Special Collection “Intergenerational family ties in Europe: Multiple linkages between individuals, families and social contexts” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/11/ |
Abstract
Background: Previous research has shown that living arrangements (independent households of those living alone or as a couple, versus coresident households encompassing adult children) are important determinants of older adults’ loneliness. However, little is known about intergenerational support exchanges in these living arrangements and their associations with loneliness.
Objective: Our aim is to contribute to the knowledge on associations between living arrangements and loneliness, by taking into account and differentiating intergenerational support types.
Methods: Using data from the Generations and Gender Surveys of three countries in Eastern Europe and two countries in Western Europe, Latent Class Analyses was applied to develop intergenerational support types for (a) co-residing respondents in Eastern Europe, (b) respondents in independent households in Eastern Europe, and (c) respondents in independent households in Western Europe, respectively. Six types resulted, distinguishing patterns of upward support, downward support and get-togethers. Subsequently, we used linear regression analyses to examine differences in loneliness by region, living arrangements and intergenerational support type.
Results: Findings show higher levels of loneliness in Eastern than in Western Europe. Older adults living alone are most lonely, older adults living with a partner are least lonely. Coresidence provides protection, but not to the same degree as a partner. In both co-resident and independent households there is a greater likelihood of being involved in support given to adult children than in support received from adult children. In both East and West European countries, older adults who are primarily on the receiving side are most lonely.
Conclusions: A better explanation of older adult loneliness is obtained if the direction of supportive exchanges with adult children is considered than if only living arrangements are considered.
Author's Affiliation
Jenny Gierveld - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands
Pearl A. Dykstra - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Niels Schenk - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
»
Social network indices in the Generations and Gender Survey: An appraisal
Volume 34 - Article 35
»
Generational interdependencies in families: The MULTILINKS research programme
Volume 27 - Article 18
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
»
Socioeconomic development and young adults’ propensity of living in one-person households: Compositional and contextual effects
Volume 44 - Article 11 | Keywords: living alone, living arrangements
»
Trends in living arrangements and their impact on the mortality of older adults: Belgium 1991‒2012
Volume 43 - Article 15 | Keywords: living arrangements, older adults
»
Public transfers and living alone among the elderly: A case study of Korea's new income support program
Volume 32 - Article 50 | Keywords: living alone, older adults
»
Loneliness and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling elderly Singaporeans
Volume 32 - Article 49 | Keywords: living alone, loneliness
»
Geographical distance between child and parent after a union dissolution in Sweden, 1974–2011
Volume 48 - Article 17 | Keywords: living arrangements
Articles
Citations
Cited References: 84
»View the references of this article
Download to Citation Manager
Similar Articles
PubMed
Google Scholar