TY  - JOUR
A1  - Sessego, Ariane
A1  - Lankoandé, Bruno
A1  - Duthé, Géraldine
A1  - Dianou, Kassoum
T1  - Studying multiple causes of death through verbal autopsies: Contribution of an index of similarity
Y1  - 2025/02/07
JF  - Demographic Research
JO  - Demographic Research
SN  - 1435-9871
SP  - 229
EP  - 272
DO  - 10.4054/DemRes.2025.52.8
VL  - 52
IS  - 8
UR  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/8/
L1  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/8/52-8.pdf
L2  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/8/52-8.pdf
L3  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/8/files/52-8%20additional%20material.zip
L3  - https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/8/files/52-8%20VACauseSimilarity_Index.zip
N2  - Background: The analysis of multiple causes of death was developed in high-income countries to study complex morbid processes leading to death. In other countries, such studies are severely limited by the lack of death certificates. Some cause-of-death statistics are produced at the local level through verbal autopsies (VAs): the collecting of information on medical history and symptoms reported by the final caregiver. Algorithmic models have been developed to estimate probable causes of death in a standardized and cost-effective manner. We investigate their potential to identify multiple causes. 

Objective: Bayesian models provide probabilities for all possible causes for each death. If multiple causes are probable, it could indicate multimorbidity or an uncertain diagnosis. In this paper, we aim to distinguish between these two possibilities. 

Methods: The INDEPTH Network provides a dataset of 72,300 adult deaths from 22 Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) sites in Asia and Africa, disaggregated by age, sex, and probable causes of death as determined by the InterVA-4 model. Using the model’s probability matrix, we estimated the degree of similarity between causes and identified those with significant dissimilarities as probable multimorbidities. We test our approach using detailed VA data from the Ouagadougou HDSS (1,714 deaths). 

Results: InterVA-4 assigns at least two probable causes to 11% of deaths, but only 2% are identified as having multiple causes. 

Conclusions: This proportion is low, but our approach remains conservative, as we cannot identify multimorbidity for similar causes. 

Contribution: This study advocates for better knowledge of multiple causes of death in low- and middle-income countries by providing a first approach to their identification through VAs. 

ER  -