Volume 16 - Article 14 | Pages 441–468  

Intergenerational family ties and the diffusion of cohabitation in Italy

By Paola Di Giulio, Alessandro Rosina

References

Axinn, W.G. and Thornton, A. (1993). Mothers, Children and Cohabitation: the intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. American Sociological Review 58(2): 233-246.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

Download reference:

Barbagli, M. (1997). Family and kinship in Italy. In: Family and kinship in Europe. London: Pinter: 33-48.

Download reference:

Barbagli, M., Castiglioni, M., and Dalla Zuanna, G. (2003). Fare famiglia in Italia. Un secolo di cambiamenti. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Behrman, J.R. (1997). Intrahousehold distribution and the family. In: Rosenweig, M.R. and Stark, O. (eds.). Handbook of Population and Family Economics. Vol. I. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science: 125-187.

Download reference:

Bernhardt, E. (2004). Cohabitation or marriage? Preferred living arrangements in Sweden. sdf-puzzle .

Bernhardt, E. and Hoem, B. (1985). Cohabitation and social background: Trends observed for Swedish women born between 1936 and 1960. European Journal of Population 1(4): 375-395.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F. and Rosina, A. (2005). `Mamma' and the diffusion of cohabitation: the Italian case. Paper presented at the Population Association of America, 2005 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, 2005.

Download reference:

Billari, F.C. and Ongaro, F. (1999). Lasciare la famiglia d’origine: Quando e perché? In: De Sandre, A., Pinnelli, A., and Santini, A. (eds.). Nuzialità e fecondità in trasformazione: percorsi e fattori del cambiamento. Il Mulino, Bologna: 327-346.

Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.-P. and Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affects the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143-168.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Booth, A. and Amato, P.R. (1994). Parental Gender Role Nontraditionalism and Offspring Outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family 56(4): 865-877.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Braun, N. and Engelhardt, H. (2004). Diffusion Processes and Event History Analysis. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research : 111-132.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L.L. (1990). What's happening to the family? Interaction between demographic and institutional change. Demography 27(4): 483-498.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cavalli, A. and De Lillo, A. (1993). Giovani anni '90, Terzo rapporto IARD sulla condizione giovanile in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Download reference:

Dalla Zuanna, G. (2001). The banquet of Aeolus: A familistic interpretation of Italy's lowest low fertility. Demographic Research 4(5): 133-161.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dalla Zuanna, G. and Micheli, G. (2004). Strong family, familism and lowest-low fertility. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

Download reference:

De Sandre, P. (2000). Patterns of fertility in Italy and factors of its decline. Genus LVI(1-2).

Download reference:

De Singly, F. (1986). L'union libre: un compromise. Dialogue 2.

Download reference:

De Valk, H.A.G. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2004). Invloed van ouders op relatievormingsvoorkeuren van Turkse, Marokkaanse en autochtone jongeren in Nederland. Migrantenstudies 20(3): 108-129.

Download reference:

Di Giulio, P. (2004). Legami familiari forti e diffusione delle convivenze in Italia. [Doctoral thesis]. Roma: Università La Sapienza.

Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ferrera, M. (1996). The `Southern Model' of Welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17-37.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Flouri, E. and Buchanan, A. (2001). What Predicts Traditional Attitudes to Marriage? Children and Society 15(4): 263-271.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F. and Goldscheider, C. (1999). The changing transition to adulthood. Leaving and returning home. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Download reference:

Goldscheider, F. and Goldscheider, C. (1993). Whose Nest? A Two-Generational View of Leaving Home During the 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family 55(4): 851-862.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gruppo di Coordinamento per la Demografia (2007). Rapporto sulla popolazione. L'Italia all'inizio del XXI secolo. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Download reference:

Hoem, J.M. (1986). The impact of education on modern family union initiation. European Journal of Population 2(2): 113-133.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (1999). Cohabitation in Western Europe. Population Trends 96: 25-32.

Download reference:

Kulik, L. (2002). The impact of social background on gender-role ideology - parents' versus children's attitudes. Journal of Family Issues 23(1): 53-73.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Neels, K. (2002). From the first to the second demographic transition: an interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population 18(4): 325-360.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and van de Kaa, D. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In: Groei en Krimp, Mens en Maatschappij. Deventer: 9-24.

Download reference:

Liefbroer, A. and de Jong Gierveld, J. (1993). The Impact of Rational Considerations and Perceived Opinions on Young Adults' Union Formation Intentions. Journal of Family Issues 14(2): 213-235.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review 12(1): 53-65.

Download reference:

Micheli, G.A. (2000). Kinship, family and social network: the anthropological embedment of fertility change in Southern Europe. Demographic Research 3(13).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Montgomery, M.R. and Casterline, J.B. (1996). Social learning, social influence, and New Models of Fertility. Population and Development Review 22: 151-175 (Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nazio, T. and Blossfeld, H.-P. (2003). The Diffusion of Cohabitation among Young Women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population 19(1): 47-82.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (2003). Cohabiting and Marriage During Young Men's Career Development. Demography 40(1): 127-149.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Palloni, A. (2001). Diffusion in Sociological Analysis. In: Casterline, J.B. (ed.). Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Download reference:

Pinquart, M. and Silbereisen, R.K. (2004). Transmission of values from adolescents to their parents: The role of value content and authoritative parenting. Adolescence 39: 83-100.

Download reference:

Prinz, C. (1995). Cohabiting, Married or Single. England: Avebury.

Download reference:

Reher, D.S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24(2): 203-234.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

Download reference:

Rosina, A. (2002). Le prime unioni alternative al matrimonio. In: Famiglie, mutamenti e politiche sociali Vol. I, Osservatorio Nazionale sulle famiglie e le politiche locali di sostegno alle responsabilità familiari. Bologna: il Mulino.

Download reference:

Rosina, A. and Billari, F. (2003). Flessibilità all’entrata in unione: i precursori del cambiamento. In: Breschi, M. and Livi Bacci, M. (eds.). La bassa fecondità in Italia: tra costrizioni economiche e cambio di valori. Forum, Udine.

Download reference:

Rosina, A. and Fraboni, R. (2004). Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy? Demographic Research 11(6): 149-172.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rosina, A., Fraboni, R., and Sabbadini, L.L. (2003). Diventare uomini e donne in Italia. In: Pinnelli, A., Racioppi, F., and Retttaroli, R. (eds.). Genere e demografia.. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Download reference:

Rosina, A. and Micheli, G. (2006). Modelli familiari e negoziazione dei percorsi di transizione allo stato adulto. (Proceedings from the Congress: Famiglie, nascite e politiche sociali, Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. 28 - 29 April 2005.).

Download reference:

Rudy, D. and Grusec, J.E. (2001). Correlates of authoritarian parenting in individualist and collectivist cultures and implications for understanding the transmission of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32(2): 202-212.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sabbadini, L.L. (1991). Le libere unioni. In: Menniti, A. (ed.). Le famiglie italiane negli anni '80 . Roma: Monografie IRP.

Download reference:

Saraceno, C. (1998). Mutamenti della famiglia e politiche sociali in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Download reference:

Scabini, E. (2000). Parent-Child Relationships in Italian Families: Connectedness and Autonomy in the Transition to Adulthood. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 16(1): 23-30.

Download reference:

Schoenpflug, U. (2001). Decision-Making Influence in the Family: A Comparison of Turkish Families in Germany and in Turkey. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 32(2): 219-230.

Download reference:

Schoenpflug, U. and Silbereisen, R.K. (1992). Transmission of values between generations in the family regarding societal keynote issues: a cross-cultural longitudinal study on Polish and German families. In: Iwawaki, S., Kashima, Y., and Leung, K. (eds.). Innovations in Cross-Cultural Psychology. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger: 269-278.

Download reference:

Schroeder, C. (2006). Cohabitation in Italy: Do parents matter? Genus 62(3-4): 53-85.

Download reference:

Smock, P.J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 1-20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Strang, D. and Tuma, N.B. (1993). Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion. American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 614-639.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A. and Camburn, D. (1987). The influence of the family on premarital sexual attitudes and behavior. Demography 24(3): 323-340.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Trent, K. and South, S.J. (1992). Sociodemographic Status, Parental background, Chilhood Family Structure, and Attitudes toward Family Formation. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(2): 427-439.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van der Slik, F.W.P., De Graaf, N.D., and Gerris, J.R.M. (2002). Conformity to parental rules: Asimmetric Influences of Father's and Mother's Levels of Education. European Sociological Review 18(4): 489-502.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Viazzo, P.P. (2003). What's so special about the Mediterranean? Thirty years of research on household and family in Italy. Continuity and Change 18(1): 111-137.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1991). From Marriage to Informal Union: Recent Changes in the Behaviour of French Couples. Population an English Selection 3: 81-111.

Download reference:

Wright, D.W. and Young, R. (1998). The effects of family structure and maternal employment on the development of gender-related attitudes among men and women. Journal of Family Issues 19(3): 300-314.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wu, Z. (2000). Cohabitation. An Alternative Form of Family Living. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Back to the article