Volume 21 - Article 7 | Pages 177–214  

"Living Apart Together" relationships in the United States

By Charles Strohm, Judith Seltzer, Susan Cochran, Vickie Mays

References

ABC News (2006). The new American family: Living apart together [electronic resource]. New York: ABC News Internet Ventures.

Adamczyk, A. and Pitt, C. (2009). Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research 38(2): 338-351.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersson, G., Noack, T., Seierstad, A., and Weedon-Fekjær, H. (2006). The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden. Demography 43(1): 79-98.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ariza, M. and De Oliveira, O. (2001). Contrasting Scenarios: Non-residential family formation patterns in the Caribbean and Europe. International Review of Sociology 11(1): 47-61.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bawin-Legros, B. and Gauthier, A. (2001). Regulation of intimacy and love semantics in couples living apart together. International Review of Sociology 11(1): 39-46.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, E., Regnier-Loilier, A., and Villeneueve-Gokalp, C. (2008). Neither Single, nor in a couple: A study of living apart together in France. Paper presented at the 2008 meetings of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, Louisiana, April 16-19 2008.

Download reference:

Becker, G. (1981). A Treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1991). A Treatise on the Family (enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Bianchi, S., Hotz, V.J., McGarry, K., and Seltzer, J. (2008). Intergenerational ties: Alternative theories, empirical findings and trends, and remaining challenges. In: Booth, A., Crouter, A., Bianchi, S., and Seltzer, J. (eds.). Intergenerational caregiving. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press: 3-43.

Download reference:

Binstock, G. and Thornton, A. (2003). Separations, reconciliations, and living apart in cohabiting and marital unions. Journal of Marriage and the Family 65(2): 432-443.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., and Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography 27(2): 139-154.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Black, D., Sanders, S., and Taylor, L. (2007). The economics of lesbian and gay families. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2): 53-70.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blackwell, D. and Lichter, D. (2004). Homogamy among dating, cohabiting, and married couples. The Sociological Quarterly 45(4): 719-737.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brim, O., Baltes, P., Bumpass, L., Cleary, P., Featherman, D., Hazzard, W., Kessler, R., Lachman, M., Markus, H., Marmot, M., Rossi, A., Ryff, C., and Shweder, R. (1995-1996). National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) [electronic resource]. ICPSR02760-v4. Ann Arbor, MI: DataStat, Inc./Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School, Dept. of Health Care Policy [producers], 2007. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2007-04-16.

Download reference:

Brooks, J. (2006). Home alone together [electronic resource]. New York: The New York Times.

Bumpass, L. (1990). What’s happening to the American family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography 27(4): 483-498.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bumpass, L. and Lu, H-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies 54(1): 29-41.

Weblink:
Download reference:

California Health Interview Survey (2005). CHIS 2003 methodology series: Report 4 - Response rates. Los Angeles, California: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.

Download reference:

Caradec, V. (1996). Les formes de la vie conjugale des "jeunes" couples "âgés". Population 51(4-5): 897-927.

Download reference:

Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., and England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography 41(2): 237-261.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carpenter, C. and Gates, G. (2008). Gay and lesbian partnership: Evidence from California. Demography 45(3): 573-590.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Casper, L., Brandon, P., DiPrete, T., Sanders, S., and Smock, P. (2008). Rethinking change and variation in unions. Designing new models for explaining family change and variation (Final report submitted to the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development).

Castro-Martín, T., Domínguez-Folgueras, M., and Martín-García, T. (2008). Not truly partnerless: Non-residential partnerships and retreat from marriage in Spain. Demographic Research 18(16): 438-468.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005). 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System summary data quality report [electronic resource]. Atlanta: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.

Weblink:
ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Data/Brfss/2004SummaryDataQualityReport.pdf
Download reference:

Cochran, S. and Mays, V. (2007). Physical health complaints among lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, and homosexually experienced heterosexuals: Results from the California Quality of Life Survey. American Journal of Public Health 97(11): 2048-2055.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cross-Barnet, C., Cherlin, A., and Burton, L. (2008). Cohabiting on the edge: Living together apart [electronic resource]. Three-City Study Working Paper 08-03. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

de Jong Gierveld, J. (2004). Remarriage, unmarried cohabitation, living apart together: partner relationships following bereavement or divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(1): 236-243.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gates, G., Badgett, L., Macomber, J., and Chambers, K. (2007). Adoption and foster care by lesbian and gay parents in the United States [electronic resource]. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gerstel, N. and Gross, H. (1984). Commuter marriage. New York: Guilford Press.

Download reference:

Gough, E. (1959). The Nayars and the definition of marriage. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 89(1): 23-34.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Haskey, J. (2005). Living arrangements in contemporary Britain: Having a partner who usually lives elsewhere and living apart together (LAT). Population Trends 122: 35-45.

Download reference:

Haskey, J. and Lewis, J. (2006). Living-apart-together in Britain: Context and meaning. International Journal of Law in Context 2(1): 37-48.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M., Loeve, A., and Manting, D. (2007). Income dynamics in couples and the dissolution of marriage and cohabitation. Demography 44(1): 159-179.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Karlsson, S. and Borell, K. (2002). Intimacy and autonomy, gender and ageing: Living apart together. Ageing International 27(4): 11-26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In: Waite, L., Bachrach, C., Hindin, M., Thomson, E., and Thornton, A. (eds.). The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter: 40-58.

Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2002). The state of European unions: An analysis of partnership formation and dissolution. In: Macura, M. and Beets, G. (eds.). Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe: Insights and lessons from comparative research. Volume I. New York: United Nations: 57-76.

Download reference:

Kurdek, L. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions in Psychological Science 14(5): 251-254.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation. In: Mason, K. and Jensen, A. (eds.). Gender and family change in industrialized countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 17-62.

Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review 32(4): 669-698.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Levin, I. (2004). Living apart together: A new family form. Current Sociology 52(2): 223-240.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Levin, I. and Trost, J. (1999). Living apart together. Community, Work & Family 2(3): 279-294.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Loftus, J. (2001). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973-1998. American Sociological Review 66(5): 762-782.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W. and Smock, P. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4): 989-1002.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Martin, E. (2007). Strength of attachment: Survey coverage of people with tenuous ties to residences. Demography 44(2): 427-440.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Milan, A. and Peters, A. (2003). Couples living apart. Canadian Social Trends, Publication of Statistics Canada. Catalogue No -11-008.

Download reference:

Narayanan, V., Edwards, S., Mays, V., Fry, S., and Cochran, S. (2005). Testing a shorter interview for refusal conversion in a telephone survey. Paper presented at the 2005 meetings of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, Florida, May 12-15 2005.

Download reference:

National Opinion Research Center (2007). Appendix A - Sampling design and weighting [electronic resource]. In: General Social Surveys, 1972-2006: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

Parsons, T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist (New Series) 45(1): 22-38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Peplau, L. and Cochran, S. (1990). A relationship perspective on homosexuality. In: McWhirter, D., Sanders, S., and Reinisch, J. (eds.). Homosexuality/Heterosexuality: Concepts of sexual orientation. New York: Oxford University Press: 321-349.

Download reference:

Peplau, L. and Fingerhut, A. (2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 405-424.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pew Research Center (2003). Republicans unified, democrats split on gay marriage: Religious beliefs underpin opposition to homosexuality [electronic resource]. Washington, D.C.: The Pew Research Center For the People & The Press and The Pew Forum On Religion & Public Life.

Rindfuss, R. and Stephen, E. (1990). Marital noncohabitation: Separation does not make the heart grow fonder. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52(1): 259-270.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, J., Bachrach, C., Bianchi, S., Bledsoe, C., Casper, L., Chase-Lansdale, P.L., DiPrete, T., Hotz, V.J., Morgan, S., Sanders, S., and Thomas, D. (2005). Explaining family change and variation: Challenges for family demographers. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4): 908-925.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P., Manning, W., and Porter, M. (2005). ‘Everything’s there except money’: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 680-696.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85-138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steven, J. and Murphy, B. (1998). Gay and lesbian relationships in a changing social context. In: Patterson, C. and D’Augelli, A. (eds.). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities in families: Psychological perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press: 99-121.

Download reference:

Stiers, G. (1999). From this day forward: Commitment, marriage, and family in lesbian and gay relationships. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Download reference:

Surkyn, J. and Lesthaeghe, R. (2002). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research S3: 45-86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

U.S. Bureau of the Census (2006). Table A1. Marital status of people 15 years and over, by age, sex, personal earnings, race, and Hispanic origin [electronic resource]. Suitland, Maryland: U.S. Census Bureau, Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, Fertility and Family Statistics Branch.

van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin 42(1): 1-59.

Download reference:

Vikat, A., Spéder, Z., Betts, G., Billari, F., Bühler, C., Désesquelles, A., Fokkema, T., Hoem, J., MacDonald, A., Neyer, G., Pailhé, A., Pinnelli, A., and Solaz, A. (2007). Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course. Demographic Research 17(14): 389-440.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Walen, H. and Lachman, M. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: Costs and benefits for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 17(1): 5-30.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Westat Corporation (2003). 2002 NSAF response rates. Rockville, Maryland (NSAF Methodology Report No. 8).

Download reference:

Weston, K. (1997). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press (paperback ed.).

Download reference:

Back to the article