Volume 24 - Article 8 | Pages 201–216  

Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The first "NO"

By Dimiter Philipov

References

Andersson, G. (2008). A review of policies and practices related to the 'highest-low' fertility of Sweden. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008(89-102) (Vienna Institute of Demography).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G. (1991). A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

BIB (2002). The Demographic Future of Europe - Facts, Figures, Policies. (Brochure).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Björklund, A. (2006). Does family policy affect fertility? Lessons from Sweden. Journal of Population Economics 19(1): 3-24.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blair-Loy, M. and Frenkel, M. (2005). Societal Cultural Models of Work and Family: An International Perspective. In: Pitt-Catsouphes, M. and Raskin, P. (eds.). Work-Family Encyclopedia. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network at Boston College.

Blossfeld, H.-P. and Hakim, C. (1997). Between equalization and marginalization. Part-time working women in Europe and the United States of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.-P. and Drobnic, S. (eds.) (2001). Careers of Couples in Contemporary Society: From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families. Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Büttner, T. and Lutz, W. (1990). Estimating fertility responses to policy measures in the German Democratic Republic. Population and Development Review 16(3): 539-555.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Council of Europe (1998). Gender mainstreaming. Conceptual framework, methodology and presentation of good practices. Final report of Activities of the Group of Specialists on Mainstreaming. Strasbourg (EG-S-MS (1998) 2).

Download reference:

Crompton, R. (ed.) (1999). Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Debroy, B. (1989). Fertility trends and population policies and programmes in Socialist Europe. Social Scientist 17(7-8): 66-87.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (2002). A New Gender Contract. In: Esping-Andersen, G., Hemerijck, A., and Myles, J. (eds.). Why we need a New Welfare State. Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Foster, C. (2000). The limits to low fertility: A biosocial approach. Population and Development Review 26(2): 209-234.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, A. H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review 26(3): 323-346.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, A.-H. and Hatzius, J. (1997). Family benefits and fertility: An econometric analysis. Population Studies 51(3): 295-306.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, A.-H. and Philipov, D. (2008). Can policies enhance fertility in Europe? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008: 1-16 (Vienna Institute of Demography).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gornick, J.C. and Meyers, M. (2003). Families that work (Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Download reference:

Haas, B. (2005). The Work-Care Balance: Is it possible to identify typologies for cross-national comparisons? Current Sociology 53(3): 487-508.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Download reference:

Irigaray, L. (1991). Ethik der sexuellen Differenz. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. In: Oppenheim-Mason, K. and Jensen, A.-M. (eds.). Gender and Family Change in Industrialised Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Download reference:

Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 2(3): 159-173.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lewis, J. (2001). The decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care. Social Politics 8(2): 152-169.

Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2006). An assessment of policies that support having children from the perspectives of equity, efficiency and efficacy. Vienna Yearbook for Population Research 2006(213-234) (Vienna Institute for Demography).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pailhé, A., Rossier, C., and Toulemon, L. (2008). French family policy: Long tradition and diversified measures. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008: 149-164 (Vienna Institute of Demography).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pascal, G. and Lewis, J. (2004). Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. Journal of Social Policy 33(3): 373-394.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pfau-Effinger, B. (2006). Cultures of childhood and the relationship of care and employment in European welfare states. In: Lewis, J. (ed.). Children, Changing Families and Welfare States. Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar: 137-153.

Download reference:

Philipov, D. (1993). Period-cohort analysis of the effectiveness of the demographic policy. Statistika 2: 40-51 (Sofia: National Statistical Institute).

Download reference:

Rønsen, M. and Skrede, K. (2008). Fertility trends and differentials in the Nordic countries - Footprints of welfare policies and challenges on the road ahead. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008: 103-123 (Vienna Institute of Demography).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stloukal, L. (1998). An APC analysis of demographic responses to population policy measures: The case of the Czech and the Slovak Republics 1960-1990. Genus 54: 87-121.

Download reference:

Udry, J.R. (1996). Biosocial models of low-fertility societies. Population and Development Review. Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories 22: 325-336.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Udry, J.R. (1994). The nature of gender. Demography 31(4): 561-573.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article