Volume 29 - Article 8 | Pages 203–232
Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior
References
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Ajzen, I. (2013). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire [electronic resource]. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Ajzen, I. (2011). Reflections on Morgan and Bachrach's critique. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research (9): 63-69.
Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In: Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., and Higgins, E.T. (eds.). Handbook of theories of social psychology. London: Sage: 438-459.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179-211.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84(5): 888-918.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I. and Madden, T.J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22(5): 453-474.
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B.T., Fishbein, M., and Muellerleile, P.A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 127(1): 142-161.
Armitage, C.J. and Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 40(4): 471-499.
Axinn, W.G., Clarkberg, M.E., and Thornton, A. (1994). Family influences on family size preferences. Demography 31(1): 65-79.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Barber, J.S. (2000). Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: Mothers' preferences for family and nonfamily behavior. Social Forces 79(1): 319-348.
Billari, F.C., Philipov, D., and Testa, M.R. (2009). Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population 25(4): 439-465.
Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review 27(Supplement: Global Fertility Transition): 260-281.
Bumpass, L. and Westoff, C.S. (1969). The prediction of completed fertility. Demography 6(4): 445-454.
Chesnais, J.-C. (2000). Determinants of below replacement fertility. In: Population Bulletin of the United Nations. United Nations: 126-136.
Chesnais, J.-C. (). . (1996). Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe. Population and Development Review 22(4): 729-739.
Cheung, S.-F. and Chan, D.K.-S. (2000 [unpublished]). The role of perceived behavioral control in predicting human behavior: A meta-analytic review of studies on the theory of planned behavior. Hong Kong: Chinese University.
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., and Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(6): 1015-1026.
Coleman, D. (1996). New patterns and trends in European fertility: International and sub-national comparisons. In: Coleman, D. (ed.). Europe's population in the 1990s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
d'Addio, A.C. and d'Ercole, M. (2005). Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates in OECD Countries: The Role of Policies. Paris: OECD Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers.
Del Boca, D., Pasqua, S., and Pronzato, C. (2009). Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: a European perspective. Oxford Economic Papers 61(Supplement 1): i147-i171.
Dommermuth, L., Klobas, J., and Lappegård, T. (2011). Now or later? The theory of planned behavior and timing of fertility intentions. Advances in Life Course Research 16(1): 42-53.
East, P.L., Felice, M.E., and Morgan, M.C. (1993). Sisters' and girlfriends' sexual and childbearing behavior: Effects on early adolescent girls' sexual outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family 55(4): 953-963.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.
Gardner, B. and Abraham, C. (2010). Going green? Modeling the impact of environmental concerns and perceptions of transportation alternatives on decisions to drive. Jounal of Applied Social Psychology 40(4): 831-849.
Gibbons, F.X., Gerrard, M., Blanton, H., and Russell, D.W. (1998). Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(5): 1164-1180.
Gillmore, M.R., Archibald, M.E., Morrison, D.M., Wilsdon, A., Wells, E.A., Hoppe, M.J., Nahom, D., and Murowchick, E. (2002). Teen sexual behavior: Applicability of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Marriage and the Family 64(4): 885-897.
Goldstein, J., Lutz, W., and Testa, M.R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5): 479-496.
Hagewen, K.J. and Morgan, S.P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970-2002. Population and Development Review 31(3): 507-527.
Hagger, M.S., Chatzisarantis, N.L.D., and Biddle, S.J.H. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 24 (1): 3-32.
Iacovou, M. and Tavares, L.P. (2010). Yearning, learning and conceding: (Some of) the reasons people change their childbearing intentions. Colchester, United Kingdom: University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research, ISER Institute for Social & Economic Research Working Paper No. 2010-22.
Jaccard, J. and Davidson, A.R. (1975). A comparison of two models of social behavior: Results of a survey sample. Sociometry 38(4): 497-517.
Klobas, J. (2010). Social psychological influences on fertility intentions: A study of eight countries in different social, economic and policy contexts. Vienna, Austria: Vienna Institute for Demography: Milan, Italy: Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics, Bocconi University, Report to the European Commission within the project “Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective” (REPRO).
Klobas, J.E. and Ajzen, I. (in press). Making the decision to have a child. In: Philipov, D., Liefbroer, A., and Klobas, J.E. (eds.). Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro environment. Amsterdam: Springer.
Kraus, S.J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(1): 58-75.
Langdridge, D., Sheeran, P., and Connolly, K. (2005). Understanding the reasons for parenthood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 23(2): 121-133.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review 36(2): 211-251.
Monnier, A. (1989). Fertility intentions and actual behaviour. A longitudinal study: 1974, 1976, 1979. Population: An English Selection 44(1): 237-259.
Morgan, P.S. and Bachrach, C.A. (2011). Is the theory of planned behaviour an appropriate model for human fertility? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research (9): 11-18.
Notani, A.S. (1998). Moderators of perceived behavioral control's predictiveness in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology 7(3): 247-271.
OECD (2010b). OECD Family Database: PF1.1 Public spending on family benefits. [electronic resource]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD (2010a). OECD Family Database: SF2.2: Ideal and actual number of children. [electronic resource]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Philipov, D. (2011). Theories on fertility intentions: A demographer's perspective. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research (9): 37-45.
Philipov, D., Liefbroer, A., Klobas, J.E., and (eds.) (in press). Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro environment. Amsterdam: Springer.
Quesnel-Vallée, A. (2003). Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5/6): 497-525.
Randall, D.M. and Wolff, J.A. (1994). The time interval in the intention-behaviour relationship: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology 33(4): 405-418.
Reyna, V.F. and Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7(1): 1-44.
Rivis, A. and Sheeran, P. (2003). Social influences and the theory of planned behaviour: Evidence for a direct relationship between prototypes and young people's exercise behaviour. Psychology and Health 18(5): 567-583.
Schifter, D.E. and Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(3): 843-851.
Schoen, R., Astone, N.M., Kim, Y.J., Nathanson, C.A., and Fields, J.M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior? Journal of Marriage and the Family 61(3): 790-799.
Schulze, R. and Wittmann, W.W. (2003). A meta-analysis of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior: The principle of compatibility and multidimensionality of beliefs as moderators. In: Schulze, R., Holling, H., and Böhning, D. (eds.). Meta-analysis: New developments and applications in medical and social sciences. Cambridge, USA: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers: 219-250.
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology 12(1): 1-36.
Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., and Warshaw, P.R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research 15(3): 325-343.
Sobotka, T. (2004). Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review 30(2): 195-200.
Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review 37(1): 57-87.
Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography 34(3): 343-354.
Udry, J.R. (1983). Do couples make fertility plans one birth at a time? Demography 20(2): 117-128.
Ventura, S.J., Curtin, S.C., Abma, J.C., and Henshaw, S.K. (2012). Estimated pregnancy rates and rates of pregnancy outcomes for the United States, 1990-2008. National Vital Statistics Reports 60(7): 1-21.
Vikat, A., Beets, G., Billari, F.C., Bühler, C., Corijn, M., Désesquelles, A., Fokkema, T., MacDonald, A.L., Neyer, G., Pailhé, A., Pinnelli, A., Solaz, A., and Spéder, Z. (2005). Wave 1 questionnaire. In: Nations, United (ed.). Generations and Gender Programme: Survey Instruments. New York, Geneva: United Nations: 35-113.
Vinokur-Kaplan, D. (1978). To have – or not to have – another child: Family planning attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 8(1): 29-46.
Webb, T.L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., and Michie, S. (2010). Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12(1): 1-27.
Webb, T.L. and Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin 132(2): 249-268.
Westoff, C.F., Mishler, E.G., and Kelly, E.L. (1957). Preferences in size of family and eventual fertility twenty years after. American Journal of Sociology 62(5): 491-497.
World Bank (2008). World Development Indicators: GDP per capita (current US$) 2005 [electronic sorce]. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.