Volume 30 - Article 13 | Pages 377–412  

Ethnic differences in integration levels and return migration intentions: A study of Estonian migrants in Finland

By Kristi Anniste, Tiit Tammaru


Background: Immigrants‘ desire to stay in the host country or return to the country of origin depends largely on the balance between their degree of integration in the host country and their level of attachment to the country of origin. Ethnic diversity is growing rapidly in European countries, including in migrant-sending countries. It may be expected that members of the ethnic minority population and the majority population have different degrees of willingness to engage in return migration depending on their different levels of attachment to their country of origin.

Objective: This study examines differences in the return migration intentions of members of the ethnic minority population and members of the majority population in the sending country. Specifically, we seek to answer two main research questions: (1) To what extent do members of the sending country‘s ethnic minority and majority groups differ in their desire to return to the sending country? (2) How does the degree of integration in the host country shape differences in the return migration intentions of members of the sending country‘s ethnic minority and majority groups?

Methods: We use representative survey data on Estonian migrants in Finland and apply binary logistic regression on our data.

Results: Results suggest that there are important differences in the integration levels and in the return migration intentions of the ethnic Estonians and the ethnic Russians from Estonia living in Finland. Despite being much better integrated into Finnish society than ethnic Russians, the ethnic Estonians are much more likely to want to return to Estonia. Indeed, our study shows that ethnicity is one of the most important personal characteristics predicting return migration.

Conclusions: There is no obvious negative relationship between integration and return migration. Being a member of the sending country majority population is associated with a stronger intention to return, even when the migrant is well integrated into the new homeland.

Author's Affiliation

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Types of spatial mobility and change in people's ethnic residential contexts
Volume 34 - Article 41

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

Black–white intermarriage in global perspective
Volume 49 - Article 28    | Keywords: endogamy, ethnicity, intermarriage, modernization, race/ethnicity

Differences in occupational homogamy by race, ethnicity, and national origin: A social mobility strategy for Asian Americans
Volume 48 - Article 18    | Keywords: assortative mating, immigrants, integration, occupation, racial/ethnic differences

Multiple (il)legal pathways: The diversity of immigrants' legal trajectories in Belgium
Volume 47 - Article 10    | Keywords: Belgium, immigration, integration, legal status, population register, sequence analysis, trajectories

The ethnic wage penalty in Western European regions: Is the European integration model confirmed when differences within countries are considered?
Volume 46 - Article 23    | Keywords: Europe, integration, migration, penalty, regions, wage discrimination

Global bilateral migration projections accounting for diasporas, transit and return flows, and poverty constraints
Volume 45 - Article 4    | Keywords: diaspora, international migration, migration transition, return migration, simulation model, transit migration