Volume 30 - Article 3 | Pages 71–110  

Men’s economic status and marital transitions of fragile families

By Sharon Sassler, Soma Roy, Elizabeth Stasny

References

Acs, G. and Maag, E. (2005). Irreconcilable differences? The conflict between marriage promotion initiatives for cohabiting couples with children and marriage penalties in tax and transfer programs. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, Assessing the New Federalism (Policy Brief B-66).

Download reference:

Acs, G. and Nelson, S. (2004). Changes in living arrangements in the late 1990s: Do welfare policies matter? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(2): 273-290.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Axinn, W. and Thornton, A. (1996). The influence of parents’ marital dissolutions on children’s attitudes toward family formation. Demography 33: 66-81.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, E. (2011). Second union fertility in France: Partners’ age and other factors. Population 66: 275-311.

Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Bernhardt, E.M. (2002). Cohabitation and marriage among young adults in Sweden: Attitudes, expectations, and plans. Scandinavian Population Studies 13: 157-170.

Download reference:

Blackwell, D.L. and Lichter, D.T. (2004). Homogamy among dating, cohabiting, and married couples. The Sociological Quarterly 45(4): 719-737.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bracher, M. and Santow, G. (1998). Economic independence and union formation in Sweden. Population Studies 52(3): 275-294.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(3): 833-847.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.L. (2010). Marriage and child well-being: Research and policy perspectives. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(4): 1059-1077.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bureau, U.S. Census (1999). Poverty Thresholds 1999 [electronic resource]. U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bzostek, S.H., McLanahan, S.S., and Carlson, M.J. (2012). Mothers’ repartnering after a nonmarital birth. Social Forces 90(3): 817-841.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carlson, M. (2006). Family structure, father involvement, and adolescent behavioral outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 137-154.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2008). Coparenting and nonresident fathers’ involvement with children after a nonmarital birth. Demography 45(2): 461-488.

Download reference:

Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., and England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography 41(2): 237-261.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Clarkberg, M. (1999). The price of partnering: The role of economic well-being in young adults’ first union experiences. Social Forces 74: 609-632.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: How love conquered marriage. Penguin Books.

Download reference:

Crissey, S.R. (2005). Race/ethnic difference in marital expectation of adolescents: The role of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 697-709.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cunningham, M. and Thornton, A. (2006). The influence of parents’ marital quality on adult children’s attitudes toward marriage and its alternative: Main and moderating effects. Demography 43: 659-672.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duvander, A. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage: A longitudinal study of the propensity to marry in Sweden in the early 1990s. Journal of Family Issues 20: 698-717.

Download reference:

Edin, K. (2000). How low-income single mothers talk about marriage. Social Problems 47: 112-133.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Edin, K. and Kafalas, M. (2005). Promises I Can Keep. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Eissa, N. and Hoynes, H.W. (2000). Explaining the fall and rise in the tax cost of marriage: The effect of tax laws and demographic trends, 1984-97. National Tax Journal 53: 683-711.

Download reference:

Eissa, N. and Hoynes, H.W. (2004). Taxes and the labor market participation of married couples: The earned income tax credit. Journal of Public Economics 88: 1931-1958.

Weblink:
Download reference:

England, P. (2004). More mercenary mate selection? Comment on Sweeney and Cancian (2004) and Press (2004). Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 1034-1037.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Freedman, V. and Wolf, D. (1995). A case study in multiple imputation. Demography 32: 459-470.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gibson-Davis, C., Edin, K., and McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes, but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family 67: 1301-1313.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gibson-Davis, C.M. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 146-160.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F.K. and Sassler, S. (2006). Creating step-families: Integrating children into the study of step-family formation. Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 1-17.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldstein, J.R. and Kenney, C.T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage foregone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review 66(4): 506-519.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Graefe, D.R. and Lichter, D.T. (2002). Marriage among unwed mothers: Whites, blacks, and Hispanics compared. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 34(November/December): 286-293.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heard, G. (2011). Socioeconomic Marriage Differentials in Australia and New Zealand. Population and Development Review 37(1): 125-160.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. (2012). Socio-economic resources and first-union formation in Finland, cohorts born 1969-81. Population Studies 66: 69-85.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jalovaara, M. (2013). Socio-economic resources and the dissolution of cohabitations and marriages. European Journal of Population 29: 167-193.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. and Luijkx, R. (2005). Has the reciprocal relationships between employment and marriage changed for men? An analysis of the life histories of men born in the Netherlands between 1930 and 1970. Population Studies 59: 211-231.

Download reference:

Kennedy, S. and Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research 19(47): 1663-1692.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kravdal, O. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies 53(1): 63-80.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kravdal, O. (1997). Wanting a child without a firm commitment to the partner: Interpretations and implications of a common behavior pattern among Norwegian cohabitants. European Journal of Population 13: 269-298.

Download reference:

Lichter, D.T., Batson, C., and Brown, J.B. (2004). Welfare reform and marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single and cohabiting mothers. Social Service Review 38: 2-25.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lichter, D.T., Graefe, D.R., and Brown, J.B. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems 50(1): 60-86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lichter, D.T., Sassler, S., and Turner, R. (2011). Childbearing among Cohabiting Women: Union Transitions and the Family Context of Nonmarital Fertility. Las Vegas, NV: American Sociological Association.

Download reference:

Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.R. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

Download reference:

Lloyd, K.L. and South, S.J. (1996). Contextual influences on young men’s transition to first marriage. Social Forces 74: 1097-1119.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manlove, J., Ryan, S., Wildsmith, E., and Franzetta, K. (2010). The Relationship Context of Nonmarital Childbearing in the U.S. Demographic Research 23: 615-653.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. (2001). Childbearing in cohabiting unions: Racial and ethnic differences. Family Planning Perspectives 33: 217-223.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D., Longmore, M.A., and Giordano, P.C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family 69(3): 559-575.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (1995). Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors. Demography 32: 509-520.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Martin, G. and Kats, V. (2003). Families and work in transition in 12 countries, 1980-2001. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Monthly Labor Review.

Download reference:

Martin, S.P. (2004). Delayed marriage and childbearing: Implications and measurement of diverging trends in family timing. In: Neckerman, K. (ed.). Social Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Download reference:

McGinnis, S.L. (2003). Cohabiting, dating, and perceived costs of marriage: A model of marriage entry. Journal of Marriage and Family 65(1): 105-116.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography 41(4): 607-627.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McLanahan, S. (2011). Family Instability and Complexity after a Nonmarital Birth: Outcomes for Children in Fragile Families. In: Carlson, M.-J. and England, P. (eds.). Social Class and Changing Families in an Unequal America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Download reference:

Moffitt, R. (1998). The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility. In: Moffitt, R. (ed.). Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press: 50-97.

Download reference:

Moors, G. and Bernhardt, E. (2009). Splitting up or getting married: Competing risk analysis of transitions among cohabiting couples in Sweden. Acta Sociologica 52(3): 227-247.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, P. (2000). Marriage-Lite: The Rise of Cohabitation and its Consequences. London: Institute for Civil Society.

Download reference:

Murray, C. (2012). Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010. New York: Crown Forum.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. (2007). Cohabitation, non-Marital childbearing, and the marriage process. Demographic Research 16(9): 249-286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. (2002). Planned and unplanned childbearing among unmarried women. Journal of Marriage and the Family 64: 915-929.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nock, S.L. (2005). Marriage as a public issue. The Future of Children 15(2): 13-32.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ohlsson-Wijk, S. (2011). Sweden’s marriage revival: An analysis of the new-millennium switch from long-term decline to increasing popularity. Population Studies 65: 183-200.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V., Kalmijn, M., and Lim, N. (1997). Men’s career development and marriage timing in a period of rising inequality. Demography 34: 311-330.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career development. Demography 40: 127-149.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Osborne, C. (2005). Marriage following the birth of a child among cohabiting and visiting parents. Journal of Marriage and Family 67: 14-26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., Sigle-Rushton, W., Keizer, R., Lappegård, T., Jasilioniene, A., Berghammer, C., and Di Giulio, P. (2012). Changes in union status during the transition to parenthood in Eleven European Countries, 1970s to Early 2000s. Population Studies 66(2): 167-182.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegard, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36: 775-801.

Download reference:

Reed, J.M. (2006). Not crossing the ‘Extra Line’: How cohabitors with children view their unions. Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 1117-1131.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reneflot, A. (2006). A gender perspective on preferences for marriage among cohabiting couples. Demographic Research 15: 311-327.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rinelli, L. (2010). Better parents, more stable partners: Union transitions among cohabiting parents. National Center for Marriage and Family Research, Bowling Green State University (Working paper series, WP-10-14).

Download reference:

Rubin, D. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.

Download reference:

Sassler, S. and Goldscheider, F.K. (2004). Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing: Changes in union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues 25: 139-166.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, S. and McNally, J. (2003). Cohabiting couple’s economic circumstances and union transitions: A re-examination using multiple imputation techniques. Social Science Research 32: 553-578.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, S. and Miller, A.J. (2011). Class differences in cohabitation processes. Family Relations 60(2): 163-177.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sassler, S. and Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61: 147-159.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schwartz, C.R. and Mare, R.D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42(4): 621-646.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human (1999). The 1999 HHS Poverty Guidelines [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sigle-Rushton, W. and McLanahan, S.S. (2002). The living arrangements of new unmarried mothers. Demography 39: 415-433.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P.J. and Manning, W.D. (1997). Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage. Demography 34: 331-341.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P.J., Manning, W.D., and Porter, M. (2005). Everything’s There Except Money:” How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family 67: 680-696.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Steuerle, C.E. and Carasso, A. (2004). The hefty tax on marriage vows facing most households with children. Princeton, NJ: The Future of Children’s Conference on Marriage and Child Well-Being.

Download reference:

Sweeney, M.M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review 67(1): 132-147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sweeney, M.M. and Cancian, M. (2004). Placing patterns of economic assortative mating in context: A reply to Press and England. Journal of Marriage and Family 66: 1038-1041.

Download reference:

Thomson, E. and Bernhardt, E. (2010). Education, values, and cohabitation in Sweden. Marriage & Family Review 46: 1-21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ventura, S.J., Martin, J.A., Curtin, S.C., Menacker, F., and Hamilton, B.E. (2001). Births: Final Data for 1999. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Reports 49(1).

Download reference:

Waller, M.R. and McLanahan, S.S. (2005). “His” and “Her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family 67: 53-67.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Waller, M.R. and Swisher, R. (2006). Fathers' risk factors in Fragile Families: Implications for "healthy" relationships and father involvement. Social Problems 53(3): 392-420.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A., Bernhardt, E., and Noack, T. (2010). Love or money? Marriage intentions among young cohabitors in Norway and Sweden. Acta Sociologica 53(3): 269-287.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A., Keizer, R., and Lappegård, T. (2012). Relationship quality in marital and cohabiting unions across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 47: 389-398.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wu, Z. and Pollard, M. (2000). Economic circumstances and the stability of nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 21(3): 303-328.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article