Volume 30 - Article 54 | Pages 1495–1526  

Attitudes on marriage and new relationships: Cross-national evidence on the deinstitutionalization of marriage

By Judith Treas, Jonathan Lui, Zoya Gubernskaya

References

A., Aassve, M., Sironi, and V., Bassi (2013). Explaining attitudes towards demographic behaviour. European Sociological Review 29(2): 316-333.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179-211.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Amato, P.R. (2004). Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 959-965.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Andersen, R. and Fetner, T. (2008). Cohort Differences in Tolerance of Homosexuality: Attitudinal Change in Canada and the United States, 1981–2000. Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 311-330.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baunach, D.M. (2011). Decomposing Trends in Attitudes Toward Gay Marriage, 1988–2006. Social Science Quarterly 92(2): 346-363.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baxter, J. and Kane, E.W. (1995). Dependence and independence: A Cross-National Analysis of Gender Inequality and Gender Attitudes. Gender & Society 9(2): 193-215.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2007). Families in a Runaway World. In: Scott, J., Treas, J., and Richards, M. (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers: 499-514.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: World Publishing.

Download reference:

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism; perspective and method. Berkeley: Univesity of California Press.

Download reference:

Budig, M. (2004). Feminism and the Family. In: Scott, J., Treas, J., and Richards, M. (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers: 416-434.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Burgess, E.W. (1963). The Family: From institution to companionship. New York: American Books.

Download reference:

Cancian, F.M. (1987). Love in America: gender and self-development. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Download reference:

Carroll, J.S., Willoughby, B., Badger, S., Nelson, L.J., McNamara Barry, C., and Madsen, S.D. (2007). So Close, Yet So Far Away: The Impact of Varying Marital Horizons on Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research 22(3): 219-247.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A. and Walters, P.B. (1981). Trends in United States Men's and Women's Sex-Role Attitudes: 1972 to 1978. American Sociological Review 46(4): 453-460.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848-861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: the state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Download reference:

Clarkberg, M., R.M., Stolzenberg, and L.J., Waite (1995). Attitudes, Values, and Entrance into Cohabitational versus Marital Unions. Social Forces Social Forces 74(2): 609-632.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were : American families and the nostalgia trap. New York, NY: BasicBooks.

Download reference:

Davis, K. (1983). The Future of Marriage. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 36(8): 15-43.

Weblink:
Download reference:

de Graaf, P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (2006). Divorce Motives in a Period of Rising Divorce: Evidence From a Dutch Life-History Survey. Journal of Family Issues 27(4): 483-505.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Diefenbach, H. and Opp, K.-D. (2007). When and Why Do People Think There Should Be a Divorce?: An Application of the Factorial Survey. Rationality and Society 19(4): 485-517.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Forste, R. and Tanfer, K. (1996). Sexual Exclusivity among Dating, Cohabiting, and Married Women. Journal of Marriage and Family 58(1): 33-47.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Frank, D.J., Camp, B.J., and Boutcher, S.A. (2010). Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005. American Sociological Review 75(6): 867-893.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gerhards, J. (2010). Non-Discrimination towards Homosexuality: The European Union’s Policy and Citizens’ Attitudes towards Homosexuality in 27 European Countries. International Sociology 25(1): 5-28.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Download reference:

Gilding, M. (2010). Reflexivity over and above convention: the new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family. The British Journal of Sociology 61(4): 757-777.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gubernskaya, Z. (2010). Changing Attitudes Toward Marriage and Children in Six Countries. Sociological Perspectives 53(2): 179-200.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Haskey, J. (2001). Cohabitation in Great Britain: past, present and future trends--and attitudes. Popul Trends 103: 4-25.

Download reference:

Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214-1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hohmann-Marriott, B.E. (2006). Shared Beliefs and the Union Stability of Married and Cohabiting Couples. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(4): 1015-1028.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Download reference:

Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Download reference:

Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000. Population Studies 61(3): 243-263.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kaufman, G. and Goldscheider, F. (2007). Do men "need" a spouse more than women?: Perceptions of the importance of marriage for men and women. Sociological Quarterly 48(1): 29-46.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kraaykamp, G. (2002). Trends and Countertrends in Sexual Permissiveness: Three Decades of Attitude Change in The Netherlands 1965–1995. Journal of Marriage and Family 64(1): 225-239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kreider, R.M. and Ellis, R. (2011). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Download reference:

Kurdek, L.A. (1998). Relationship Outcomes and Their Predictors: Longitudinal Evidence from Heterosexual Married, Gay Cohabiting, and Lesbian Cohabiting Couples. Journal of Marriage and Family 60(3): 553-568.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lauer, S. and Yodanis, C. (2010). The Deinstitutionalization of Marriage Revisited: A New Institutional Approach to Marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review 2(1): 58-72.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lee, K.S., Tufiş, P.A., and Alwin, D.F. (2010). Separate Spheres or Increasing Equality? Changing Gender Beliefs in Postwar Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(1): 184-201.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural Dynamics and Economic Theories of Fertility Change. Population and Development Review 14(1): 1-45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lesthaeghe, R. and van der Kirk, D. (1986). Twee Demografische Transities? Mens en Maatschappij 26: 9-24.

Download reference:

Liefbroer, A. and Fokkema, T. (2008). Recent trends in demographic attitudes and behaviour: Is the Second Demographic Transition moving to Southern and Eastern Europe? In: Surkyn, J. and Deboosere, P. (eds.). Demographic Challenges for the 21st Century: A State of the Art in Demography. Brussels: VUB Press: 115-142.

Download reference:

Light, A. (2004). Gender differences in the marriage and cohabitation income premium. Demography 41(2): 263-284.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review 12(1): 53-65.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mason, K.O. and Lu, Y.-H. (1988). Attitudes toward U.S. women's familial roles, 1977–1985. Gender and Society 2(1): 39-57.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Musick, K. and Bumpass, L. (2012). Reexamining the Case for Marriage: Union Formation and Changes in Well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(1): 1-18.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mynarska, M. and Bernardi, L. (2007). Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation. Demographic Research 16(17): 519-554 (10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.17).

Download reference:

Ohlander, J., Batalova, J., and Treas, J. (2005). Explaining educational influences on attitudes toward homosexual relations. Social Science Research 34(4): 781-799.

Weblink:
Download reference:

P.Y, Goodwin, D., Mosher W., and A., Chandra (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth. 23(28).

Download reference:

Pagnini, D.L. and Rindfuss, R.R. (1993). The Divorce of Marriage and Childbearing: Changing Attitudes and Behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review 19(2): 331-347.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pampel, F. (2011). Cohort change, diffusion, and support for gender egalitarianism in cross-national perspective. Demographic Research 25(21): 667-694 (10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.21).

Download reference:

Parsons, T. and Bales, R.F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.

Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B. and Gerber, T.P. (2011). Nonmarital Childbearing in Russia: Second Demographic Transition or Pattern of Disadvantage? Demography 48(1): 317-342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poortman, A.-R. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2010). Singles’ relational attitudes in a time of individualization. Social Science Research 39(6): 938-949.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poortman, A.-R. and Lyngstad, T.H. (2007). Dissolution risks in first and higher order marital and cohabiting unions. Social Science Research 36(4): 1431-1446.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Raymo, J.M., Iwasawa, M., and Bumpass, L. (2009). Cohabitation and family formation in Japan. Demography 46(4): 785-803.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rijken, A. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2012). European views of divorce among parents of young children: Understanding cross-national variation. Demographic Research 27(2): 25-52 (10.4054/DemRes.2012.27.2).

Download reference:

Rosenfeld, M.J. (2010). Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school. Demography 47(3): 755-775.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Russell, H., McGinnity, F., Callan, T., and Keane, C. (2009). A woman's place: female participation in the Irish labour market. Dublin: Equality Authority/ESRI.

Download reference:

Scott, J., Alwin, D.F., and Braun, M. (1996). Generational Changes in Gender-Role Attitudes: Britain in a Cross-National Perspective. Sociology 30(3): 471-492.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Skinner, K.B., Bahr, S.J., Crane, D.R., and Call, V.R. (2002). Cohabitation, Marriage, and Remarriage: A Comparison of Relationship Quality Over Time. Journal of Family Issues 23(1): 74-90.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smock, P.J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An Appraisal of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications. Annual Review of Sociology 26(1): 1-20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Solomon, S.E., Rothblum, E.D., and Balsam, K.F. (2005). Money, Housework, Sex, and Conflict: Same-Sex Couples in Civil Unions, Those Not in Civil Unions, and Heterosexual Married Siblings. Sex Roles 52(9-10): 561-575.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Soons, J.P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is Marriage More Than Cohabitation? Well-Being Differences in 30 European Countries. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1141-1157.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Syltevik, L.J. (2010). Sense and sensibility: cohabitation in ‘cohabitation land’. The Sociological Review 58(3): 444-462.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thornton, A. and Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four Decades of Trends in Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States: The 1960s Through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(4): 1009-1037.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Treas, J. (2002). How Cohorts, Education, and Ideology Shaped a new Sexual Revolution on American Attitudes Toward Nonmarital Sex, 1972-1998. Sociological Perspectives 45(3): 267-283.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Treas, J. (2008). The Dilemma of Gender Specialization: Substituting and Augmenting Wives' Household Work. Rationality and Society 20(3): 259-282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Treas, J. and De Ruijter, E. (2008). Earnings and Expenditures on Household Services in Married and Cohabiting Unions. Journal of Marriage and Family 70(3): 796-805.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Treas, J. and Widmer, E.D. (2000). Married Women's Employment over the Life Course: Attitudes in Cross- National Perspective. Social Forces 78(4): 1409-1436.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Widmer, E.D., Treas, J., and Newcomb, R. (1998). Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries. The Journal of Sex Research 35(4): 349-358.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wu, Z., Penning, M.J., Pollard, M.S., and Hart, R. (2003). “In Sickness and in Health”: Does Cohabitation Count? Journal of Family Issues 24(6): 811-838.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yabiku, S.T. and Gager, C.T. (2009). Sexual Frequency and the Stability of Marital and Cohabiting Unions. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(4): 983-1000.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article