Volume 31 - Article 3 | Pages 71–104  

Do coresidence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries

By Tsui-o Tai, Janeen Baxter, Belinda Hewitt

References

Gender equality: transforming family divisions of labor (2009). London; New York: Verso.

Download reference:

Acock, A.C. (2005). Working With Missing Values. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4): 1012-1028.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Amato, P. R. and Booth, A. (1995). Changes in Gender Role Attitudes and Perceived Marital Quality. American Sociological Review 60(1): 58-66.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Amato, P.R. and Booth, A. (1997). A generation at risk: growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Amato, P.R. and Rogers, S.J. (1999). Do Attitudes Toward Divorce Affect Marital Quality? Journal of Family Issues 20(1): 69-86.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Batalova, J.A. and Cohen, P.N. (2002). Premarital Cohabitation and Housework: Couples in Cross-National Perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 64(3): 743-755.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baxter, J. (2005). To Marry or Not to Marry: Marital Status and the Household Division of Labor. Journal of Family Issues 26(3): 300-321.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., and Haynes, M. (2008). Life Course Transitions and Housework: Marriage, Parenthood, and Time on Housework. Journal of Marriage and Family 70(2): 259-272.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernard, J. (1982). The future of marriage. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.-P. and Drobnič, S. (2001). Careers of couples in contemporary societies: from male breadwinner to dual-earner families. Oxford [UK]; New York: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Brown, S.L. (2003). Relationship Quality Dynamics of Cohabiting Unions. Journal of Family Issues 24(5): 583-601.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.L. and Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus Marriage: A Comparison of Relationship Quality. Journal of Marriage and Family 58(3): 668-678.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.L. and Kawamura, s. (2010). Relationship quality among cohabitors and marrieds in older adulthood. Social Science Research 39(5): 777-786.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Budig, M.J. and England, P. (2001). The Wage Penalty for Motherhood. American Sociological Review 66(2): 204-225.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chandola, T., Coleman, D.A., and Hiorns, R.W. (2002). Distinctive features of age-specific fertility profiles in the English-speaking world: Common patterns in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States, 1970-98. Population Studies 56(2): 181-200.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2009). The marriage-go-round : the state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Download reference:

Deacon, B. (1992). The New Eastern Europe: social policy past, present and future. London: Sage Publications.

Download reference:

Duncan, S. and Phillips, M. (2010). People who live apart together (LATs) – how different are they? The Sociological Review 58(1): 112-134.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fajth, G. (1999). Social Security in a Rapidly Changing Environment: The Case of the Post-communist Transformation. Social Policy & Administration 33(4): 416-436.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Farley, R. (1996). The new American reality: who we are, how we got here, where we are going. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Download reference:

Fuwa, M. and Cohen, P.N. (2007). Housework and social policy. Social Science Research 36(2): 512-530.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, A.H. (2002). Family Policies in Industrialized Countries: Is There Convergence? Population 57(3): 447-474.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gerber, T.P. and Berman, D. (2010). Entry to Marriage and Cohabitation in Russia, 1985–2000: Trends, Correlates, and Implications for the Second Demographic Transition. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 26(1): 3-31.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Glenn, N.D. and McLanahan, S. (1982). Children and Marital Happiness: A Further Specification of the Relationship. Journal of Marriage and Family 44(1): 63-72.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gupta, S. (1999). The Effects of Transitions in Marital Status on Men's Performance of Housework. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(3): 700-711.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Haskey, J. and Lewis, J. (2006). Living-apart-together in Britain: context and meaning. International Journal of Law in Context 2(1): 37-48.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214-1230.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Houseknecht, S.K. and Pankhurst, J.G. (2000). Family, religion, and social change in diverse societies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Download reference:

Huston, T.L. and Melz, H. (2004). The case for (promoting) marriage: The devil is in the details. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 943-958.

Weblink:
Download reference:

International Labour Organization (2012). Labour Statistics [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

International Monetary Fund (2004). Government Finance Statistics Yearbook. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

Download reference:

International Monetary Fund (2005). Government Finance Statistics Yearbook. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

Download reference:

International Monetary Fund (2006). Government Finance Statistics Yearbook. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

Download reference:

International Social Survey Programme (2002). Family and Changing Gender Roles III [electronic resource].

Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990–2000. Population Studies 61(3): 243-263.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Karlsson, S.G. and Borell, K. (2005). A home of their own. Women's boundary work in LAT-relationships. Journal of Aging Studies 19(1): 73-84.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Karlsson, S.G. and Borell, K. (2002). Intimacy and autonomy, gender and ageing: Living apart together. Ageing International 27(4): 11-26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In: Waite, L.J., Bachrach, C., Hindin, M., Thompson, E., and Thornton, A. (eds.). The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine De Gruyter: 40-58.

Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2004). Redrawing the boundaries of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 980-987.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 1-21.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Köppen, K. (2011). Marriage and cohabitation in western Germany and France. [Ph.D.]. Rostock, Germany: University of Rostock and the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.

Download reference:

Lawson, J. and Milligan, V. (2007). International trends in housing and policy responses. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI Final Report No. 110).

Download reference:

Levin, I. (2004). Living Apart Together: A New Family Form. Current Sociology 52(2): 223-240.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Levin, I. and Trost, J. (1999). Living apart together. Community, Work & Family 2(3): 279-294.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography 43(2): 203-221.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (2002). First Comes Cohabitation and then Comes Marriage?: A Research Note. Journal of Family Issues 23(8): 1065-1087.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Michigami, M. (2011). Comparison of affordability of Russian and Japanese housing markets. Far Eastern Studies 10: 25-57.

Download reference:

Motiejunaite, A. and Kravchenko, Z. (2008). Family policy, employment and gender-role attitudes: a comparative analysis of Russia and Sweden. Journal of European Social Policy 18(1): 38-49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nesporova, A. (2002). Why unemployment remains so high in Central and Eastern Europe. Geneva: ILO International Labour Office (Employment Paper; 2002/43).

Download reference:

Noch, S.L. (1995). A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting Relationships. Journal of Family Issues 16(1): 53-76.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Norris, M. and Shiels, P. (2007). Housing inequalities in an enlarged European Union: patterns, drivers, implications. Journal of European Social Policy 17(1): 65-76.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oppenheimer, V.K., Kalmijn, M., and Lim, N. (1997). Men’s career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography 34(3): 311-330.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). OECD Stat Extracts [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R.L., and Crouter, A.C. (2000). Work and Family in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(4): 981-998.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reimondos, A., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2011). Living-apart-together (LAT) relationships in Australia. Family Matters 87: 43-55.

Download reference:

Rhoades, G.K., Stanley, S.M., and Markman, H.J. (2012). A Longitudinal Investigation of Commitment Dynamics in Cohabiting Relationships. Journal of Family Issues 33(3): 369-390.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Roseneil, S. (2006). On not living with a partner: unpicking coupledom and cohabitation. Sociological Research Online 11.

Samarina, O. (2001). The social protection of women and family policy in contemporary Russia. Problems of Economic Transition 44(1): 72-80.

Download reference:

Smock, P.J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An Appraisal of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications. Annual Review of Sociology 26(1): 1-20.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Toulemon, L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research 19(6): 85-138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Soons, J.P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is Marriage More Than Cohabitation? Well-Being Differences in 30 European Countries. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(5): 1141-1157.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stanley, S.M. and Markman, H.J. (1992). Assessing Commitment in Personal Relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 54(3): 595-608.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stanley, S.M., Rhoades, G.K., and Markman, H.J. (2006). Sliding Versus Deciding: Inertia and the Premarital Cohabitation Effect*. Family Relations 55(4): 499-509.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Stanley, S.M., Whitton, S.W., and Markman, H.J. (2004). Maybe I Do: Interpersonal Commitment and Premarital or Nonmarital Cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 25(4): 496-519.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Strohm, C., Seltzer, J., Cochran, S., and Mays, V. (2009). "Living Apart Together" relationships in the United States. Demographic Research 21(7): 177-214.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sweeney, M. (2002). Two Decades of Family Change: The Shifting Economic Foundations of Marriage. American Sociological Review 67(1): 132-147.

Weblink:
Download reference:

UNECE (2012). Generations and Gender Programme [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

UNESCO (2012). International standard classification of education [electronic resource].

United Nations (2012). Demographic yearbook [electronic resource].

Wiik, K.A., Bernhardt, E., and Noack, T. (2009). A Study of Commitment and Relationship Quality in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(3): 465-477.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wiik, K.A., Keizer, R., and Lappegård, T. (2012). Relationship Quality in Marital and Cohabiting Unions Across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(3): 389-398.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wilcox, W.B. and Nock, S.L. (2006). What's Love Got To Do With It? Equality, Equity, Commitment and Women's Marital Quality. Social Forces 84(3): 1321-1345.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Willetts, M.C. (2006). Union Quality Comparisons Between Long-Term Heterosexual Cohabitation and Legal Marriage. Journal of Family Issues 27(1): 110-127.

Weblink:
Download reference:

World Bank (2010). All the Ginis dataset [electronic resource].

World Bank (2012). The World Development Indicators [electronic resource].

Zdravomyslova, O. (1995). The position of women. In: Lane, D.S. (ed.). Russia in Transition. Harlow: Longman: 190-198.

Download reference:

Back to the article