Volume 31 - Article 36 | Pages 1107–1136
Free to stay, free to leave: Insights from Poland into the meaning of cohabitation
30 Mar 2014
12 Nov 2014
This article is part of the Special Collection 17 "Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia"
Background: Previous studies have shown that in Poland cohabitation is most of all a transitory step or a testing period before marriage. Polish law does not recognize this living arrangement and it has been portrayed as uncommitted and short-lived. However, few studies have investigated what cohabitation means for relationships, especially with respect to freedom.
Objective: We explore how young people in Poland understand and evaluate freedom in cohabitation. We investigate how they view the role freedom plays in couple dynamics and in relationship development.
Methods: We analyze data from focus group interviews conducted in Warsaw with men and women aged 25-40. We identify passages in which opinions on cohabitation and marriage are discussed, and use bottom-up coding and the constant comparative method to reconstruct different perspectives on the issue of freedom in cohabitation.
Results: The respondents argued that cohabitation offers the partners freedom to leave a union at any time with few repercussions. On the negative side, the freedom related to cohabitation brings insecurity, especially for young mothers. On the positive side, it offers relaxed conditions for testing a relationship, grants partners independence, and encourages cohabitors to keep their relationship interesting, precisely because it is fragile and easy to dissolve.
Conclusions: The open nature of cohabitation offers benefits to partners, but does not provide secure conditions for childbearing. As long as the couple is not planning to have children, however, the benefits of cohabitation are likely to be seen as outweighing the disadvantages.
- Monika Mynarska - Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, Poland EMAIL
- Anna Baranowska-Rataj - Umeå Universitet, Sweden EMAIL
- Anna Matysiak - Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, Poland EMAIL
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
Poland: Fertility decline as a response to profound societal and labour market changes?
Volume 19 - Article 22
The quality of fertility data in the web-based Generations and Gender Survey
Volume 49 - Article 3
Exploring the concept of intensive parenting in a three-country study
Volume 44 - Article 13
The positive impact of women’s employment on divorce: Context, selection, or anticipation?
Volume 38 - Article 37
Does the number of siblings affect health in midlife? Evidence from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register
Volume 35 - Article 43
Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34
Levels of recent union formation : Six European countries compared
Volume 22 - Article 9
Is Poland really 'immune' to the spread of cohabitation?
Volume 21 - Article 8
Stochastic forecast of the population of Poland, 2005-2050
Volume 17 - Article 11
Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation
Volume 16 - Article 17
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
An alternative version of the second demographic transition? Changing pathways to first marriage in Japan
Volume 49 - Article 16
pattern of disadvantage,
second demographic transition,
Adult children’s union type and contact with mothers: A replication
Volume 48 - Article 23
A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland
Volume 48 - Article 14
Socioeconomic preconditions to union formation: Exploring variation by migrant background
Volume 45 - Article 32
The role of premarital cohabitation in the timing of first birth in China
Volume 45 - Article 8