Volume 31 - Article 37 | Pages 1137–1166  

Cohabitation and marriage in Austria: Assessing the individualization thesis across the life course

By Caroline Berghammer, Katrin Fliegenschnee, Eva-Maria Schmidt

This article is part of the Special Collection 17 „Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia“

Abstract

Background: Although cohabitation has spread rapidly in Austria during the past decades, it is more a prelude than an alternative to marriage. The individualization thesis serves as a conceptual framework for explaining the rise of cohabiting unions.

Objective: Our aim is to understand what motivates people to cohabit and marry from an individualization perspective. The present study was designed to investigate in which ways key notions of the individualization thesis such as commitment, romantic love and risk are reflected in discourses on cohabitation and marriage.

Methods: Research is based on data from eight focus group discussions (71 participants) conducted in Vienna, Austria, in 2012. This data was analyzed with the help of qualitative methods.

Results: The focus group participants regarded cohabitation and marriage as different life course strategies. They felt that young adulthood is a period characterized by uncertain external circumstances, in which people build up commitment in cohabitation without feeling limited in terms of opportunities. As dissolving a cohabiting union entails lower costs, the risk posed by this type of union was considered low. The respondents associated marriage with security and long-term commitment and saw it as an ideal for a later stage in life. They argued that romantic love and individual satisfaction should prevail throughout the entire marriage. Core terms of the individualization thesis - commitment, romantic love, and risk - were perceived differently between cohabitation and marriage. We conclude that the individualization thesis best fits young adulthood and is less relevant for later life stages.

Author’s Affiliation

• Caroline Berghammer - Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Austria EMAIL
• Katrin Fliegenschnee - Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Austria EMAIL
• Eva-Maria Schmidt - Universität Wien, Austria EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Educational pairings, partners’ economic resources, and second births in Austria
Volume 55 - Article 26

The European Parenting Leave Policies (EPLP) dataset: Leave duration entitlements for 21 countries from 1970 to 2024
Volume 54 - Article 31

Is single parenthood increasingly an experience of less-educated mothers? A European comparison over five decades
Volume 51 - Article 34

Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34

Similar articles in Demographic Research

Digital matches and marital roles: Online partner selection and nontraditional housework in Japan
Volume 55 - Article 28    | Keywords: gender, housework, Japan, Japan, marriage, online dating

Educational pairings, partners’ economic resources, and second births in Austria
Volume 55 - Article 26    | Keywords: Austria, couples, cure model, fertility, hypogamy, second birth

The impact of reducing welfare obstacles on union formation and dissolution among the unemployed: Evidence from the Finnish Basic Income Experiment
Volume 55 - Article 21    | Keywords: cohabitation, family dynamics, Finland, income, marriage, union dissolution, welfare

Fertility timing and the birth squeeze
Volume 54 - Article 40    | Keywords: birth squeeze, cyclical populations, fertility, marriage, marriage squeeze, stable population

Partnering in turbulent times: Hooking up, dating, and romantic relationship formation in college, 2019–2024
Volume 54 - Article 37    | Keywords: college students, COVID-19, gender, partner choice, relationship formation, romantic love, sexual orientation