Volume 32 - Article 24 | Pages 723–774  

Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1

By Jorik Vergauwen, Jonas Wood, David De Wachter, Karel Neels

References

Abraham, Katharine G., Maitland, Aaron, and Bianchi, Suzanne M. (2006). Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey: Who Is Missing from the Data and How Much Does It Matter? Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5): 676-703.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aleshina, Nadezhda and Redmond, Gerry (2005). How high is infant mortality in central and eastern Europe and the commonwealth of independent states? Population Studies 59(1): 39-54.

Weblink:
Download reference:

American Association for Public Opinion Research (2011). Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys [unpublished manuscript]. Ann Arbor, MI: AAPOR.

Download reference:

Auriat, Nadia (1991). Who forgets? An analysis of memory effects in a retrospective survey on migration history. European Journal of Population 7(4): 311-342.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ayhan, H. Öztaş and Işiksal, Semih (2005). Memory recall errors in retrospective surveys: A reverse record check study. Quality and Quantity 38(5): 475-493.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. (2013). Counting how many children people want: the influence of question filters and pre-codes. Demográphia English Edition 56(3): 35-61.

Download reference:

Beckett, Megan, Vanzo, Julie Da, Sastry, Narayan, Panis, Constantijn, and Peterson, Christine (2001). The Quality of Retrospective Data: An Examination of Long-Term Recall in a Developing Country. The Journal of Human Resources 36(3): 593-625.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Belli, Robert F. (1998). The Structure of Autobiographical Memory and the Event History Calendar: Potential Improvements in the Quality of Retrospective Reports in Surveys. Memory 6(4): 383-406.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bergstrand, Robert, Vedin, Anders, Wilhelmsson, Claes, and Wilhelmsen, Lars (1983). Bias due to non-participation and heterogenous sub-groups in population surveys. Journal of Chronic Diseases 36(10): 725-728.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P., Golsch, K., and Rohwer, G. (2007). Event History Analysis with Stata. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Download reference:

Blossfeld, H.P. and Rohwer, G. (2001). Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Casual Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Download reference:

Buber, I. (2013). Attrition in the Austrian generations and gender survey. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography (VID Working Papers 10/2013).

Download reference:

Buber, I. (2010). Parity-Specific Weights for the Austrian Generations and Gender Survey. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography (VID Working Papers 4/2010).

Download reference:

Burkimsher, M. (2009). Assessment of fertility indicators derived from GGP samples. Bulgaria, Hungary and Georgia [unpublished manuscript]. University of Lausanne.

Download reference:

Calot, Gérard (1984). La mesure des taux en démographie: Taux par âge en années révolues et taux par âge atteint dans l'année. Population (French Edition) 39(1): 107-146.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Campanelli, P., Sturgis, P., and Purdon, S. (1997). Can You Hear Me Knocking: An Investigation into the Impact of Interviewers on Survey Response Rates. London: National Centre for Social Research (NCSR paper).

Download reference:

Cherlin, Andrew, Griffith, Jeanne, and McCarthy, James (1983). A Note on Maritally-Disrupted Men’s Reports of Child Support in the June 1980 Current Population Survey. Demography 20(3): 385-389.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Childs, Jennifer Hunter and Landreth, Ashley (2006). Analyzing Interviewer/Respondent Interactions while Using a Mobile Computer-Assisted Personal Interview Device. Field Methods 18(3): 335-351.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Council of Europe (2005). Recent Demographic Developments in Europe: 2004. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

Download reference:

Couper, Mick P., Singer, Eleanor, and Kulka, Richard A. (1998). Participation in the 1990 Decennial Census: Politics, Privacy, Pressures. American Politics Research 26(1): 59-80.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, R.E., Couper, M.P., Janz, N.K., Caldwell, C.H., and Resnicow, K. (2010). Interviewer effects in public health surveys. Health Education Research 25(1): 14-26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

De Wulf, K., Van Kenhove, P., and Wijnen, K. (2003). The influence of topic involvement on mail survey response behavior. Gent: Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.

Download reference:

Dex, Shirley and McCulloch, Andrew (1998). The Reliability of Retrospective Unemployment History Data. Work, Employment & Society 12(3): 497-509.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duan, Naihua, Alegria, Margarita, Canino, Glorisa, McGuire, Thomas G., and Takeuchi, David (2007). Survey Conditioning in Self-Reported Mental Health Service Use: Randomized Comparison of Alternative Instrument Formats. Health Services Research 42(2): 890-907.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Festy, P. and Prioux, F. (2002). An evaluation of the Fertility and Family Surveys project. New York: United Nations Publications.

Download reference:

Fitzgerald, John, Gottschalk, Peter, and Moffitt, Robert (1998). An Analysis of the Impact of Sample Attrition on the Second Generation of Respondents in the Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. The Journal of Human Resources 33(2): 300-344.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gadeyne, S. and Deboosere, P. (2000). Socio-economische factoren in de differentiële sterfte van vrouwen van 40–59 jaar in België. Analyse van de Nationale Databank Mortaliteit. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Working Papers Steunpunt Demografie 2000-8).

Download reference:

Generations and Gender Programme (2014). Data Documentation [electronic resource]. GGP.

Gibson, John and Kim, Bonggeun (2010). Non-Classical Measurement Error in Long-Term Retrospective Recall Surveys*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 72(5): 687-695.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldberg, Marcel, Chastang, Jean François, Leclerc, Annette, Zins, Marie, Bonenfant, Sébastien, Bugel, Isabelle, Kaniewski, Nadine, Schmaus, Annie, Niedhammer, Isabelle, Piciotti, Michèle, Chevalier, Anne, Godard, Catherine, and Imbernon, Ellen (2001). Socioeconomic, Demographic, Occupational, and Health Factors Associated with Participation in a Long-term Epidemiologic Survey: A Prospective Study of the French GAZEL Cohort and Its Target Population. American Journal of Epidemiology 154(4): 373-384.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Groves, R.M., Fowler, F.J., Couper, J.M., Lepkowski, J.M., Singer, E., and Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology. Hoboken: Wiley.

Download reference:

Groves, Robert M. and Couper, Mick P. (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Groves, Robert M. and Lyberg, Lars (2010). Total Survey Error: Past, Present, and Future. Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 849-879.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hayford, SarahR and Morgan, S. Philip (2008). The quality of retrospective data on Cohabitation. Demography 45(1): 129-141.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hertrich, V. (1998). Are men's and women's answers to be equally trusted? A dual collection of birth and marriage histories in a population in Mali. Population: An English Selection 10(2): 303-318.

Download reference:

Hill, P.B. (2005). Methodenprobleme in der Ehe- und Familiensoziologie. In: Busch, F.W. and Nave-Herz, R. (eds.). Familie und Gesellschaft. Beiträge zur Familienforschung. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag: 165-186.

Download reference:

Jacobs, Sheila C. (2002). Reliability and recall of unemployment events using retrospective data. Work, Employment & Society 16(3): 537-548.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Joyner, Kara, Peters, H. Elizabeth, Hynes, Kathryn, Sikora, Asia, Taber, JamieRubenstein, and Rendall, MichaelS (2012). The Quality of Male Fertility Data in Major U.S. Surveys. Demography 49(1): 101-124.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Juby, H. and Le Bourdais, C. (1999). Where have All the Children Gone? Comparing Mothers’ and Fathers’ Declarations in Retrospective Surveys. Canadian Studies in Population 26(1): 1-20.

Download reference:

Kessler, R.C., Little, R.J., and Groves, R.M. (1995). Advances in strategies for minimizing and adjusting for survey nonresponse. Epidemiologic Reviews 17(1): 192-204.

Download reference:

Klein, T. and Fischer-Kerli, D. (2000). Die Zuverlässigkeit retrospektiv erhobener Lebensverlaufsdaten: Analysen zur Partnerschaftsbiografie des Familiensurvey. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 29(4): 294-312.

Download reference:

Klijzing, E. and Cairns, H. (2000). On the Quality of FFS Event History Data: Of Critical Importance In Life Course Research. Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld (Globalife Working Paper No. 13).

Download reference:

Kreyenfeld, M., Hornung, A., Kubisch, K., and Jaschinski, I. (2010). Fertility and Union Histories from German GGS Data: Some Critical Reflections. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR Working Paper 2010-023).

Download reference:

Kreyenfeld, M., Zeman, K., Burkimsher, M., and Jaschinski, I. (2010). Fertility data for German-speaking countries What is the potential? Where are the pitfalls?. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR Working Paper 2011-003).

Download reference:

Krosnick, Jon A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5(3): 213-236.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kvåle, G., Heuch, I., and Nilssen, S. (1994). Parity in Relation to Mortality and Cancer Incidence: A Prospective Study of Norwegian Women. International Journal of Epidemiology 23(4): 691-699.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kveder, A. (2005). A Note on the Definitions of Final Disposition Codes. In: United Nations (ed.). Generations and Gender Programme: Survey Instruments. Geneva: United Nations: 117-118.

Download reference:

Lauwereys, G., Neels, K., and De Winter, T. (2011). GGS Wave 1 Belgium: Final Disposition Codes & Standardised Response Rates. GGP Belgium Paper Series (GGP Belgium Paper Series No. 3).

Download reference:

Lievesley, D. (1988). Unit Non-Response in Interview Surveys. London: Social and Community Planning Research (Working Paper).

Download reference:

Lucas, ChristopherP., Fisher, Prudence, Piacentini, John, Zhang, Haiying, Jensen, PeterS., Shaffer, David, Dulcan, Mina, Schwab-Stone, Mary, Regier, Darrel, and Canino, Glorisa (1999). Features of Interview Questions Associated with Attenuation of Symptom Reports. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 27(6): 429-437.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lynn, P., Beerten, R., Laiho, J., and Martin, J. (2001). Recommended Standard Final Outcome Categories and Standard Definitions of Response Rate for Social Surveys. Essex: University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER Working Papers 2001-23).

Download reference:

Mitchell, Colter (2010). Are Divorce Studies Trustworthy? The Effects of Survey Nonresponse and Response Errors. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(4): 893-905.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, S. Philip, Botev, Nikolai, Chen, Renbao, and Huang, Jianping (1999). White and nonwhite trends in first birth timing: Comparisons using vital registration and current population surveys. Population Research and Policy Review 18(4): 339-356.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, Michael (2000). The Evolution of Cohabitation in Britain, 1960-95. Population Studies 54(1): 43-56.

Download reference:

Murphy, Michael (2009). Where have all the children gone? Women's reports of more childlessness at older ages than when they were younger in a large-scale continuous household survey in Britain. Population Studies 63(2): 115-133.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Neels, K. (2006). Reproductive strategies in Belgian fertility, 1960–1990. Brussels/The Hague: NIDI-CBGS.

Download reference:

Neels, K. and Gadeyne, S. (2010). Het effect van opleidingsniveau op tempo en kwantum van rangspecifieke vruchtbaarheid in België: 1960–2000. In: Matthijs, K., Putte, B., Van de Kok, J., and Bras, H. (eds.). Leven in de lage landen: historisch-demografisch onderzoek in Vlaanderen en Nederland. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco: 211-238.

Download reference:

Ní Bhrolcháin, Máire , Beaujouan, Éva, and Murphy, Michael (2011). Sources of error in reported childlessness in a continuous British household survey. Population Studies 65(3): 305-318.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nicoletti, Cheti and Peracchi, Franco (2005). Survey response and survey characteristics: microlevel evidence from the European Community Household Panel. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 168(4): 763-781.

Weblink:
Download reference:

O’Connell, M. (2007). The visible hand: Editing marital-history data from Census Bureau surveys. In: Hofferth, S.L. and Casper, L.M. (eds.). Handbook of measurement issues in family research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 145-158.

Download reference:

Peters, H. Elizabeth (1988). Retrospective Versus Panel Data in Analyzing Lifecycle Events. The Journal of Human Resources 23(4): 488-513.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Piacentini, J., Jensen, P., and Schaffer, D. (1991). Attenuation of child p.sychiatric diagnostic information: a detailed analysis. Paper presented at the Scientific Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the AACAP, VII, San Francisco, CA.

Download reference:

Pickery, J., Loosveldt, G., and Carton, A. (2001). The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys: A Multilevel Approach. Sociological Methods & Research 29(4): 509-523.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poulain, M., Riandey, B., and Firdion, J.M. (1992). Data from a life history survey and from Belgian Population Register: A comparison. Population: An English Selection 4: 77-96.

Download reference:

Régnier-Loilier, A. (2011). Présentation, questionnaire et documentation de la troisième vague de l’Étude des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles (Erfi-GGS 2011). Paris: INED (Documents de travail 187).

Download reference:

Régnier-Loilier, Arnaud (2007). Conditions de passation et biais occasionnés par la présence d'un tiers sur les réponses obtenues à l'enquête Érfi. Economie et statistique 407(1): 27-49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rendall, Michael S., Clarke, Lynda, Peters, H. Elizabeth, Ranjit, Nalini, and Verropoulou, Georgia (1999). Incomplete reporting of men’s fertility in the united states and britain: A research note. Demography 36(1): 135-144.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sauer, L., Ruckdeschel, K., and Naderi, R. (2012). Reliability of retrospective event histories within the German Generations and Gender Survey. Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB Working Paper 1/2012).

Download reference:

Shachar, Ron and Eckstein, Zvi (2007). Correcting for bias in retrospective data. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(3): 657-675.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Simard, M. and Franklin, S. (2005). Sample Design Guidelines. In: United Nations (ed.). Generations and Gender Programme. Survey Instruments. Geneva: United Nations.

Download reference:

Smith, James P. and Thomas, Duncan (2003). Remembrances of things past: test–retest reliability of retrospective migration histories. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 166(1): 23-49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sorensen, Elaine (1997). A National Profile of Nonresident Fathers and Their Ability to Pay Child Support. Journal of Marriage and Family 59(4): 785-797.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spielauer, M. (2007). The Contextual Database of The Generations and Gender Programm. In: United Nations (ed.). Generations and Gender Programme. Concepts and Guidelines. Geneva: United Nations.

Download reference:

Sudman, S. and Bradburn, N.M. (1974). Response Effects in Surveys: A review and synthesis. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.

Download reference:

Sudman, Seymour and Bradburn, Norman M. (1973). Effects of Time and Memory Factors on Response in Surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68(344): 805-815.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Swicegood, C. Gray, Morgan, S. Philip, and Rindfuss, RonaldR (1984). Measurement and Replication: Evaluating the Consistency of Eight U. S. Fertility Surveys. Demography 21(1): 19-33.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Van Loon, A. Jeanne M., Tijhuis, Marja, Picavet, H. Susan J., Surtees, Paul G., and Ormel, Johan (2003). Survey Non-response in the Netherlands: Effects on Prevalence Estimates and Associations. Annals of Epidemiology 13(2): 105-110.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Velkoff, Victoria A. and Miller, Jane E. (1995). Trends and Differentials in Infant Mortality in the Soviet Union, 1970–90: How Much Is Due to Misreporting? Population Studies 49(2): 241-258.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vikat, A., Spéder, Z., Beets, G., Billari, F. C., Bühler, C., Désesquelles, A., Fokkema, T., Hoem, J.M., MacDonald, A., Neyer, G., Pailhé, A., Pinnelli, A., and Solaz, A. (2007). Generations and Gender Survey: Concept and Design. In: United Nations (ed.). Generations and Gender Programme. Concepts and Guidelines. Geneva: United Nations.

Download reference:

Wagenaar, Willem A. (1986). My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years. Cognitive Psychology 18(2): 225-252.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Weisberg, H.F. (2009). The Total Survey Error Approach: A Guide To The New Science Of Survey Research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Download reference:

Wu, Lawrence L., Martin, Steven P., and Long, Daniel A. (2001). Comparing Data Quality of Fertility and First Sexual Intercourse Histories. The Journal of Human Resources 36(3): 520-555.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wunsch, G.J. and Termote, M.G. (1978). Introduction to demographic analysis. Principles and Methods. New York: Plenum Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zabel, Cordula (2009). Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context? Demographic Research 21(6): 135-176.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article