Volume 35 - Article 21 | Pages 581–616  

Are daughters’ childbearing intentions related to their mothers’ socio-economic status?

By Maria Rita Testa, Valeria Bordone, Beata Osiewalska, Vegard Skirbekk

References

Acock, A.C. and Bengtson, V.L. (1980). Socialization and attribution process actual versus perceived similarity among parents and youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family 42(3): 501‒515.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ajzen, I. (2005). Laws of human behavior: Symmetry, compatibility, and attitude-behavior correspondence. In: Beauducel, A., Biehl, B., Bosniak, M., Conrad, W., Schönberger, G., and Wagener, D. (eds.). Multivariate research strategies. Maastricht: Shaker Publishers: 3‒19.

Download reference:

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179‒211.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Download reference:

Barber, J.S. (2001). Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives. Social Psychology Quarterly 64(2): 101‒127.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Billari, F.C., Goisis, A., Liefbroer, A.C., Settersen, R.A., Aassve, A., Hagestad, G., and Speder, Z. (2010). Social age deadlines for the childbearing of women and men. Human Reproduction 26(3): 616‒622.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Billari, F.C., Philipov, D., and Testa, M.R. (2009). Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population 25: 439‒466.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bolzendahl, C.I. and Myers, D.J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces 83(2): 759–790.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (2003). Completing the fertility transition in the developing world: The role of educational differences and fertility preferences. Population Council (Policy Research Working Paper; 177).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (1992). Do reproductive intentions matter? International Family Planning Perspectives 18(3): 102‒108.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. and Watkins, S.C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review 22(4): 639‒682.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chan, C.G. and Elder, G.H., Jr. (2000). Matrilineal advantage in grandchild- grandparent relations. Gerontologist 40(2): 179‒190.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coall, D.A. and Hertwig, R. (2010). Grandparental investments: Past, present, and future. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 33(1): 1‒59.

Weblink:
Download reference:

D’Addio, A.C. and Mira d’Ercole, M. (2005). Trends and determinants of fertility rates in OECD countries: The role of policies. Paris: OECD Publishing (Social, employment and migration working papers, 27).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Del Boca, D and Rosina, A. (2009). Famiglie sole: Sopravvivere con un welfare insufficiente. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Download reference:

Del Boca, D. (2002). Low fertility and labour force participation of Italian women: evidence and interpretation. Paris: OECD Publishing (Labour market and social policy occasional papers, 61).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Del Boca, D. and Vuri, D. (2007). The mismatch between employment and child care in Italy: The impact of rationing. Journal of Population Economics 20(4): 805‒832.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dommermuth, L., Klobas, J., and Lappegård, T. (2011). Now or later? The theory of planned behaviour and timing of fertility intentions. Advances in Life Course Research 16: 42‒53.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dubas, J.S. (2001). How gender moderates the grandparent-grandchild relationship: A comparison of kin-keeper and kin-selector theories. Journal of Family Issues 22(4): 478‒492.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Easterlin, R.A. (1980). Birth and fortune. New York: Basic Books.

Download reference:

Elder, G.H. , Jr. (1977). Family history and the life course. Journal of Family History 2(4): 279‒304.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Elder, G.H., Jr. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly 57(1): 4‒15.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ellingsæter, A.L. and Leira, A. (2006). Introduction: Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. In: Ellingsæter, A.L. and Leira, A. (eds.). Gender relations in welfare states. Bristol: Policy Press: 1‒25.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Download reference:

Fan, P.L. and Marini, M.M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research 29(2): 258–283.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fernandez, R. and Fogli, A. (2006). Fertility: The role of culture and family experience. Journal of the European Economic Association 4(2‒3): 52‒561.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.

Download reference:

Folbre, N. (1983). Of patriarchy born: The political economy of fertility decisions. Feminist Studies 9(2): 261‒284.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gauthier, A.H. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review 26(3): 323‒346.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Genov, N. and Krasteva, A. (2001). Recent social trends in Bulgaria, 1960‒1995. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Download reference:

Glass, J., Bengtson, V.L., and Dunham, C.C. (1986). Attitude similarity in three- generation families: Socialization, status inheritance, or reciprocal influence? American Sociological Review 51(5): 685‒698.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gustavsson, S. (ed.) (2006). Education and postponement of maternity. Amsterdam: Kluwer.

Download reference:

Hiekel, N. and Castro-Martín, T. (2014). Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(3): 489‒505.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hin, S., Gauthier, A.H., Goldstein, J., and Bühler, C. (2011). Fertility preferences: What measuring second choices teaches us. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 131‒156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hirsch, M.B., Seltzer, J.R., and Zelnik, M. (1981). Desired family size of young American women, 1971 and 1976. In: Hendershot, G.E. and Placek, P.J. (eds.). Predicting fertility. Lexington: Lexington Books: 207‒233.

Download reference:

Iacovou, M. and Tavares, L.P. (2011). Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review 37(1): 89‒123.

Weblink:
Download reference:

J., Goldstein, Lutz, W., and Testa, M.R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement fertility ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5‒6): 479‒496.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jejeebhoy, S.J. (1995). Women’s education, autonomy and reproductive behaviour: Experience from developing countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Download reference:

Jones, E.F. (1982). Socio-economic differentials in achieved fertility: World Fertility Survey comparative studies 21. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.

Download reference:

Kahn, J.R. and Anderson, K.E. (1992). Intergenerational pattern of teenage fertility. Demography 29(1): 39‒57.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kaser, K. (2008). Patriarchy after patriarchy: Gender relations in Turkey and in the Balkans, 1500‒2000. Münster: Lit Verlag.

Download reference:

Keim, S., Klärner, A., and Bernardi, L. (2009). Who is relevant? Exploring fertility relevant social networks. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR Working Paper; WP 2009-001).

Download reference:

Kohler, H.P., Behrman, J.R., and Watkins, S.C. (2001). The density of social networks and fertility decisions: evidence from South Nyanza district, Kenya. Demography 38(1): 43‒58.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.P., Rodgers, J.L., and Christensen, K. (1999). Is fertility behavior in our genes? Findings from a Danish twin study. Population and Development Review 25(2): 253–288.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kotte, M. and Ludwig, V. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of fertility intentions and behaviour in Germany: The role of contagion. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 207–226.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kravdal, Ø. and Rindfuss, R.R. (2008). Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review 73(5): 854–873.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kye, B. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of women’s educational attainment in South Korea: An application of a multi-group population projection model. Demographic Research 24(3): 79‒112.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34(1): 1‒14.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T. (2010). Family policies and fertility in Norway. European Journal of Population 26(1): 99‒116.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lee, R. (1980). Aiming at moving target: period fertility and changing reproductive goals. Population Studies 34(2): 205‒226.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: A life-course perspective. European Journal of Population 25(4): 363‒386.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Billari, F.C. (2010). Bringing norms back in: A theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour. Population, Space and Place 16(4): 287‒305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Elzinga, C.H. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of behavioural patterns: How similar are parents’ and children’s demographic trajectories? Advances in Life Course Research 17(1): 1‒10.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lupri, E. (1983). The changing position of women in family and society: A cross-national comparison. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Download reference:

Mace, R. and Sear, R. (2005). Are humans cooperative breeders? In: Voland, E., Chasiotis, A., and Schiefenhövel, W. (eds.). Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press: 143‒159.

Download reference:

Mare, R.D. and Maralani, V. (2006). The intergenerational effects of changes in women’s educational attainments. American Sociological Review 71(4): 542‒564.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Matras, J. (1961). Differential fertility, intergenerational occupational mobility, and change in the occupational distribution: Some elementary interrelationships. Population Studies 15(2): 187‒197.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review 26(3): 427–439.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review 32(3): 485–510.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mencarini, L. and Tanturri, M.L. (2004). Time use, family role-set and childbearing among Italian working women. Genus 60(1): 111–137.

Download reference:

Miller, W.B. (2011). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: Implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 9: 75‒98.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B. and Pasta, D.J. (1995). Behavioural intentions: Which ones predict fertility behaviour in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(6): 530‒555.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mills, M., Mencarini, L., Tanturri, M.L., and Begall, K. (2008). Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demographic Research 18(4): 1–26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Montgomery, M.R. and Casterline, J.B. (1996). Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Population and Development Review 22(Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New patterns, new theories): 151‒175.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, K.J. (2006). Working mothers and the welfare state:Rreligion and the politics of work-family policies in western Europe and the United States. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Download reference:

Moursund, A. and Kravdal, Ø. (2003). Individual and community effects of women’s education and autonomy on contraceptive use in India. Population Studies 57(3): 285‒301.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. and Knudsen, L.B. (2002). The intergenerational transmission of fertility in contemporary Denmark: The effects of number of siblings (full and half), birth order, and whether male or female. Population Studies 56(3): 235‒248.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Murphy, M. and Wang, D. (2001). Family-level continuities in childbearing in low- fertility societies. European Journal of Population 17(1): 75‒96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Naldini, M. (2003). The family in the Mediterranean welfare states. London/Portland: Taylor and Francis.

Download reference:

Osiewalska, B. (2013). Transmission of fertility pattern in mother–daughter relation: Bayesian view (a case study of Austria). Studia Demograficzne 1(163): 3‒35.

Download reference:

Pissarides, C.A., Garibaldi, P., Olivetti, C., Petrongolo, B., and Wasmer, E. (2005). Women in the labor force: How well is Europe doing? In: Boeri, T., Del Boca, D., and Pissarides, C. (eds.). Women at work: An economic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 9‒120.

Download reference:

Pollet, T.V., Nelissen, M., and Nettle, D. (2009). Lineage based differences in grandparental investment: Evidence from a large British cohort study. Journal of Biosocial Science 41(3): 355‒379.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rodgers, J.L. and Doughty, D. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on fertility expectations and outcomes using NLSY kinship data. In: Rodgers, J.L., Rowe, D.C., and Miller, W.B. (eds.). Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality. New York: Springer: 85‒105.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Saraceno, C. (1997). Family change, family policies and the restructuring of welfare. In: OECD (ed.). Family, market and community. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: 81‒100 (Social Policy Studies No. 21).

Download reference:

Scherbov, S., Mamolo, M., Potančoková, M., Sobotka, T., and Zeman, K. (2014). European demographic data sheet 2014. Vienna: Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital (IIASA, VID/ÖAW, WU).

Download reference:

Skirbekk, V. (2008). Fertility trends by social status. Demographic Research 18(5): 145‒180.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Starrels, M.E. and Holm, K.E. (2000). Adolescents’ plans for family formation: Is parental socialization important? Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(2): 416–429.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tanskanen, A.O. and Rotkirch, A. (2014). The impact of grandparental investment on mother’s fertility intentions in four European countries. Demographic Research 31(1): 1‒26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Testa, M.R. (2012). Family sizes in Europe: Evidence from the 2011 Eurobarometer Survey. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of Sciences, European Demographic Research Paper, 2.

Download reference:

Testa, M.R. (2014). On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: Individual- and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research 21: 28‒42.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Testa, M.R. and Grilli, L. (2006). The influence of childbearing regional contexts on ideal family size in Europe. Population-E 61(1–2): 109–138.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Testa, M.R. and Toulemon, L. (2006). Family formation in France: Individual preferences and subsequent outcome. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 4: 41‒75.

Download reference:

Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography 34(3): 343‒354.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thomson, E. (1992). Family structure, gender and parental socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(2): 368‒378.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Westoff, C.F. and Potvin, R.H. (1967). College women and fertility values. College women and fertility values: Princeton University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zuo, J. and Tang, S. (2000). Breadwinner status and gender ideologies of men and women regarding family roles. Sociological Perspectives 43(1): 29–43.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article