Volume 35 - Article 48 | Pages 1411–1440  

Equality at home - A question of career? Housework, norms, and policies in a European comparative perspective

By Susanne Fahlén

References

Aassve, A., Fuochi, G., and Mencarini, L. (2014). Desperate housework: Relative resources, time availability, economic dependency, and gender ideology across Europe. Journal of Family Issues 35(8): 1000‒1022.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Agarwal, B. (1997). ‘Bargaining’ and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics 3(1): 1‒51.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aliaga, C. (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe? Luxembourg: European Communities, Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions.

Download reference:

Allen, T.D., Johnson, R.C., Kiburz, K.M., and Shockley, K.M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology 66(2): 345‒376.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anxo, D., Fagan, C., Smith, M., Letablier, M.-T., and Perraudin, C. (2007). Part-time work in European companies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Download reference:

Anxo, D., Mencarini, L., Paihlé, A., Solaz, A., Tanturri, M.L., and Flood, L. (2011). Gender differences in time-use over the life-course in France, Italy, Sweden and the US. Feminist Economics 17(3): 159‒195.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Batalova, J.A. and Cohen, P.N. (2002). Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 64(3): 743‒755.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., and Western, M. (2009). Who uses paid domestic labor in Australia? Choice and constraint in hiring household help. Feminist Economics 15(1): 1‒26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Becker, G.S. (1993). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Download reference:

Berk, S.F. (1985). The gender factor. New York: Plenum Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bettio, F. and Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics 10(1): 85‒113.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bianchi, S., M., Milkie, Sayer, L., and K., Robinson (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces 79(1): 191–228.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., and Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 186‒214.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology 100(3): 652‒688.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(4): 1208‒1233.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cooke, L.P. (2006). Policy, preferences, and patriarchy: The division of domestic labor in East Germany, West Germany, and the United States. Social Politics 13(1): 117‒143.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Coverman, S. (1985). Explaining husbands’ participation in domestic labor. The Sociological Quarterly 26(1): 81‒97.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Craig, L. and Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work‒family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(5): 1344‒1361.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., and Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: A cross-national analysis in two waves. Work, Employment & Society 19(2): 213‒233.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Davis, S.N. and Greenstein, T.N. (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1260‒1271.

Weblink:
Download reference:

ESS (2010/2011). European Social Survey, Round 5 [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

ESS (2011). Weighting European Social Survey Data [electronic resource].

Eurostat (2014). Formal childcare by age group and duration 2010. [electronic resource]

Evertsson, M. and Nermo, M. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review 23(4): 455‒470.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Evertsson, M. and Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the division of labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1272‒1286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

EVS (2008). European Values Study, the 4th wave [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fahey, T., Nolan, B., and Whelan, C.T. (2003). Monitoring quality of life in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Download reference:

Fahlén, S. (2013). The agency gap: Policies, norms and working time capabilities across welfare states. In: Hobson, B. (ed.). Worklife balance: The agency and capabilities gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 35‒56.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ferrarini, T. (2006). Families, states and labour markets: Institutions, causes and consequences of family policies in post-war welfare states. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Download reference:

Ferree, M.M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriage: Dimension of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues 12(2): 158‒180.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17–37.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review 69(6): 751‒767.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fuwa, M. and Cohen, P.N. (2007). Housework and social policy. Social Science Research 36(2): 5112‒530.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Geist, C. (2005). The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review 21(1): 23‒41.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., and Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207‒239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gornick, J., Meyers, M., and Ross, K. (1997). Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 7(1): 45‒70.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Greenstein, T.N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(2): 322‒335.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gregory, A. and Milner, S. (2009). Editorial: Work–life balance: A matter of choice? Gender, Work and Organization 16(1): 1‒13.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family 69(2): 399‒417.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hook, J.L. (2010). Gender inequality in the welfare state: Sex segregation in housework, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review 115(5): 1480‒1523.

Weblink:
Download reference:

ILO (2014). ISCO, International Standard Classification of Occupations. International Labour Organization.

Kamo, Y. (2000). ‘He said, she said’: Assessing discrepancies in husbands’ and wives’ reports on the division of household labor. Social Science Research 29(4): 459‒476.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kan, M.Y. (2008). Does gender trump money? Housework hours of husbands and wives in Britain. Work, Employment & Society 22(1): 45‒66.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Känsälä, M. and Oinas, T. (2016). The division of domestic work among dual-career and other dual-earner couples in Finland. Community, Work & Family 19(4): 438‒461.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Keck, W. and Saraceno, C. (2013). The impact of different social-policy frameworks on social inequalities among women in the European Union: The labour-market participation of mothers. Social Politics 20(3): 297–328.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Killewald, A. and Gough, M. (2010). Money isn’t everything: Wives’ earnings and housework time. Social Science Research 39(6): 987‒1003.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics 7(2): 127‒191.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies 5(4): 353‒375.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lucchini, M., Saraceno, C., and Schizzerotto, A. (2007). Dual-earner and dual-career couples in contemporary Italy. In: Saraceno, C. (ed.). Dual-career couples. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich: 289‒309.

Download reference:

Lundberg, S. and Pollak, R.A. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(4): 139‒158.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Misra, J., Budig, M., and Boeckman, I. (2011). Work‒family policies and the effects of children on women’s employment hours and wages. Community, Work & Family 14(2): 139‒157.

Weblink:
Download reference:

OECD (2013). Childcare support, 2008.

Weblink:
Download reference:

OECD (2013). Key characteristics of parental leave systems 2011/12. OECD family database [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

OECD (2010). Maternal employment rates [electronic resource].

Weblink:
Download reference:

Orloff, A. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review 58(3): 303‒328.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pfau-Effinger, B. (2012). Women’s employment in the institutional and cultural context, international. Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 32(9/10): 530‒543.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Plantenga, J. and Remery, C. (eds.) (2009). The provision of childcare services. A comparative review of 30 European countries. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Download reference:

Saxonberg, S. and Sirovátka, T. (2006). Failing family policy in post-communist Central Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 8(2): 185‒202.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sayer, L.C. (2010). Trends in housework. In: Treas, J. and Drobnič, S. (eds.). Dividing the domestic. Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 19‒38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sullivan, O., Billari, F.C., and Altintas, E. (2014). Fathers’ changing contributions to child care and domestic work in very low–fertility countries: The effect of education. Journal of Family Issues 35(8): 1048‒1065.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Treas, J. and Drobnič, S. (2010). Dividing the domestic. Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Treas, J. and Tai, T. (2016). Gender inequality in housework across 20 European nations: Lessons from gender stratification theories. Sex Roles 74(11): 495‒511.

Weblink:
Download reference:

West, C. and Zimmerman, D.H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society 1(2): 125‒151.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article