Volume 36 - Article 16 | Pages 501–524  

Division of housework and his and her view of housework fairness: A typology of Swedish couples

By Leah Ruppanner, Eva Bernhardt, Maria Brandén

References

Ahrne, G. and Roman, C. (1997). Hemmet, barnen och makten: Förhandlingar om arbete och pengar i familjen. Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet (Statens offentliga utredningar 1997: 139).

Download reference:

Baxter, T. (2000). The joys and justice of housework. Sociology 34(4): 609‒631.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Baxter, T., Hewitt, B., and Haynes, M. (2008). Life course transitions and housework: Marriage, parenthood, and time on housework. Journal of Marriage and Family 70(2): 259–272.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernhardt, E., Noack, T., and Lyngstad, T.H. (2008). Shared housework in Norway and Sweden: advancing the gender revolution. Journal of European Social Policy 18(3): 275–288.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bernhardt, M.E. (1988). The choice of part-time work among Swedish one-child mothers. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 4(2): 117–144.

Download reference:

Collins, L.M. and Lanza, S.T. (2013). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: John Wiley.

Download reference:

Dempsey, K.C. (1999). Attempting to explain women’s perceptions of the fairness of the division of housework. Journal of Family Studies 5(1): 3–24.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dribe, M. and Stanfors, M. (2009). Does parenthood strengthen a traditional household division of labor? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(1): 33–45.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Evertsson, M. (2014). Gender ideology and the sharing of housework and child care in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues 35(7): 927–949.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Evertsson, M. and Nermo, M. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review 23(4): 455–470.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Evertsson, M. and Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the division of labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1272–1286.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Frisco, M.L. and Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues 24(1): 51–73.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review 69(6): 751–767.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Geist, C. (2005). The welfare state and the home: Regime differences in the domestic division of labour. European Sociological Review 21(1): 23–41.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., and Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Government Offices of Sweden (2016). Objective of gender equality policy [electronic resource]. Sweden: Government Offices of Sweden.

Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family 61(3): 700–711.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hook, J.L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries. American Sociological Review 71(4): 639–660.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kaufman, G., Bernhardt, E., and Goldscheider, F. (2016). Enduring egalitarianism? Family transitions and attitudes toward gender equality in Sweden. Journal of Family Issues .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kitterød, R.H. and Lappegård, T. (2012). A typology of work family arrangements among dual earner couples in Norway. Family Relations 61(4): 671–685.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kluwer, E.S., Heesink, J.A., and Van De Vliert, E. (1997). The marital dynamics of conflict over the division of labor. Journal of Marriage and Family 59(3): 635–653.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lee, Y.S. and Waite, L.J. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(2): 328–336.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nordenmark, M. and Nyman, C. (2003). Fair or unfair? Perceived fairness of household division of labour and gender equality among women and men the Swedish case. European Journal of Women's Studies 10(2): 181–209.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Offer, S. and Schneider, B. (2011). Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns, multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review 76(6): 809–833.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Oláh, L.S. and Gähler, M. (2014). Gender equality perceptions, division of paid and unpaid work, and partnership dissolution in Sweden. Social Forces 93(2): 571–594.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perales, F., Baxter, J., and Tai, T.O. (2015). Gender, justice and work: A distributive approach to perceptions of housework fairness. Social Science Research 51: 51–63.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ruppanner, L. (2010). Conflict and housework: Does country context matter? European Sociological Review 26(5): 557‒570.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ruppanner, L. (2013). Conflict between work and family: an investigation of four policy measures. Social Indicators Research 110(1): 327–347.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ruppanner, L., Branden, M., and Turunen, J. (2017). Does unequal housework lead to divorce? Evidence from Sweden. Sociology .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sayer, L.C. (2005). Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces 84(1): 285–303.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smith, H.L., Gager, C.T., and Morgan, S.P. (1998). Identifying underlying dimensions in spouses’ evaluations of fairness in the division of household labor. Social Science Research 27(3): 305–327.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues 12(2): 181–196.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article