Volume 37 - Article 13 | Pages 363–416
Abadie, A. and Imbens, G.W. (2011). Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 29(1): 1–11.
Aisenbrey, S., Evertsson, M., and Grunow, D. (2009). Is there a career penalty for mothers’ time out? A comparison of Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Social Forces 88(2): 573–605.
Albrecht, J.W., Edin, P., Sundström, M., and Vroman, S.B. (1999). Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: A reexamination using Swedish data. The Journal of Human Resources 34(2): 294–311.
Amuedo-Dorantes, C. and Kimmel, J. (2005). The motherhood wage gap for women in the United States: The importance of college and fertility delay. Review of Economics of the Household 3(1): 17–48.
Anderson, D.J., Binder, M., and Krause, K. (2003). The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work schedule flexibility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56(2): 273–294.
Becker, G.S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics 3(1): S33–S58.
Bergemann, A. and Riphahn, R.T. (2015). Maternal employment effects of paid parental leave. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics (IZA discussion paper no. 9073).
Blackburn, M.L., Bloom, D.E., and Neumark, D. (1993). Fertility timing, wages, and human capital. Journal of Population Economics 6(1): 1–30.
Blau, F.D. and Kahn, L.M. (2013). Female labor supply: Why is the US falling behind? Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics (IZA discussion paper no. 7140).
Bloom, D.E. and Trussell, J. (1984). What are the determinants of delayed childbearing and permanent childlessness in the United States? Demography 21(4): 591–611.
Blundell, R., Dearden, L., and Sianesi, B. (2005). Evaluating the effect of education on earnings: Models, methods, and results from the National Child Development Study. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 168(3): 473–512.
Bongaarts, J. (2002). The end of the fertility transition in the developed world. Population and Development Review 28(3): 419–443.
Brehm, U. and Buchholz, S. (2014). Is there a wrong time for a right decision? The impact of the timing of first births and the spacing of second births on women’s careers. Journal of Family Research 26(3): 269–301.
Buckles, K.S. and Munnich, E.L. (2012). Birth spacing and sibling outcomes. Journal of Human Resources 47(3): 613–642.
Budig, M.J. and England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review 66(2): 204–225.
Bumpass, L.L., Rindfuss, R.R., and Janosik, R.B. (1977). Age and marital status at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility. Paper presented at the Center for Demography and Ecology, Madison.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013). Women in the labor force: A datebook. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Labor (BLS Report 1040).
Busso, M., DiNardo, J., and McCrary, J. (2014). New evidence on the finite sample properties of propensity score reweighting and matching estimators. Review of Economics and Statistics 96(5): 885–897.
Centers for Disease Control (2015). Social determinants and eliminating disparities in teen pregnancy [electronic resource]. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Dye, J.L. (2008). Fertility of American women: 2006 [electronic resource]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau.
Fitzenberger, B., Sommerfeld, K., and Steffes, S: (2013). Causal effects on employment after first birth: A dynamic treatment approach. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labor Economics (IZA discussion paper no. 7438).
Gangl, M. and Ziefle, A. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women's careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography 46(2): 341–369.
Guzzo, K.B. and Hayford, S. (2011). Fertility following and unintended first birth. Demography 48(4): 1493–1516.
Hamilton, B.E. and Martin, J.A. (2013). Historical and recent trends in childbirth in the United States. Paper presented at the Institute on Medicine and National Research Council workshop on research issues in the assessment of birth settings, Washington, D.C., March 6–7, 2013.
Han, W., Ruhm, C.J., Waldfogel, J., and Washbrook, E. (2008). The timing of mothers' emloyment after childbirth. Monthly Labor Review 131(6): 15–27.
Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., and Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica 66(5): 1017–1098.
Heckman, J.J., Lochner, L.J., and Todd, P.E. (2003). Fifty years of Mincer earnings regressions. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER working paper no. 9732).
Herr, J.L. (2012). Measuring the effect of the timing of first birth [unpublished manuscript] [electronic resource]. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.
Hoffman, S.D. (1998). Teenage childbearing is not so bad after all... or is it? A review of the new literature. Family Planning Perspectives 30(5): 236–243.
Hotz, V.J., Klerman, J.A., and Willis, R.J. (1997). The economics of fertility in developed countries. In: Rosenzweig, M.R. and Stark, O. (eds.). Hanbook of population and family economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science: 275–347.
Karimi, A. (2014). The spacing of births and women's subsequent earnings: Evidence froma natural experiment. Uppsala: IFAU Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU working paper 2014: 18).
Killewald, A. and Gough, M. (2013). Does specialization explain marriage and parenthood penalties and premiums? American Sociological Review 78(3): 477–502.
Laughlin, L. (2011). Maternity leave and employment patterns, 1961–2008. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau (Current population reports P70–128).
Lechner, M. and Wiehler, S. (2011). Kids or courses? Gender differences in the effects of active labor market policies. Journal of Population Economics 24(3): 783–812.
Loughran, D.S. and Zissimopoulos, J. (2009). Why wait? The effect of marriage and childbearing on the wages of men and women. Journal of Human Resources 44(2): 326–349.
Lundberg, S. and Rose, E. (2000). Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics 7(6): 689–710.
Manning, W.D. (1995). Cohabitation, marriage, and entry into motherhood. Journal of Marriage and Family 57(1): 191–200.
Manning, W.D., Brown, S.L., and Stykes, B. (2015). Trends in births to single and cohabiting mothers, 1980–2013. Bowling Green : National Center for Family and Marriage Research (NCFMR Family Profiles FP-15-03).
Martin, S.P. (200). Diverging fertility among U.S. women who delay childbearing past age 30. Demography 37(4): 523–533.
Miller, A.R. (2011). The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics 24(3): 1071–1100.
Mincer, J. and Polachek, S. (1974). Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. In: Schultz, T.W. (ed.). Marriage, family, human capital, and fertility. Ann Arbor: UMI: 76–110.
National Partnership for Women and Families (2013). A look at the U.S. Department of Labor's 2012 Family and Medical Leave Act employee and worksite surveys [electronic resource]. Washington, D.C.: National Partnership for Women and Families.
Noonan, M. and Corcoran, M. (2004). The mommy track and partnership: Temporary delay or dead end? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596(1): 130–150.
Peltola, P.K. (2004). Mothers' level of attachment to the labor market following the birth of a second child. [PhD thesis]. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Sociology.
Pollak, R.A. (2005). Bargaining power in marriage: Earnings, wage rates, and household production. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER working paper no. 11239).
Rindfuss, R.R., Morgan, S.P., and Offutt, K. (1996). Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility, 1963–1989. Demography 33(3): 277–290.
Robins, J. (1999). Association, causation, and marginal structural models. Synthese 121(1–2): 151–179.
Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1): 4155.
Ross, S.G. (1974). The timing and spacing of births and women's labor force participation: An economic analysis. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER working paper no. 30).
Rubin, D.B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics 6(1): 34–58.
Rubin, D.B. (1074). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 66(5): 688–701.
Sampson, R.J., Laub, J.H., and Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology 44(3): 465–508.
Sharkey, P. and Elwert, F. (2011). The legacy of disadvantage: Multigenerational neighborhood effects on cognitive ability. American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1934–1981.
Sianesi, B. (2004). An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labor marget programs in the 1990s. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1): 133–155.
Stone, P. and Lovejoy, M. (2004). Fast-track women and the 'choice' to stay home. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596(1): 62–83.
Troske, K.R. and Voicu, A. (2013). The effect of the timing and spacing of births on the level of labor market involvement of married women. Empirical Economics 45(1): 483–521.
Waldfogel, J. (1997). The effect of children on wmen's wages. American Sociological Review 62(2): 209–217.
Wilde, E.T., Batchelder, L., and Ellwood, D. (2010). The mommy track divides: The impact of childbearing on wages of women of differing skill levels. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER working paper no. 16582).
Wodtke, G.T., Harding, D.J., and Elwert, F. (2011). Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective. American Sociological Review 76(5): 713–736.
Yamaguchi, K. and Ferguson, L.R. (1995). The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors: Rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. American Sociological Review 60(2): 272–298.