Volume 37 - Article 35 | Pages 1081–1230
Life-table representations of family dynamics in the 21st century
By Gunnar Andersson, Elizabeth Thomson, Aija Duntava
References
Andersson, G. (2002a). Children’s experience of family disruption and family formation: Evidence from 16 FFS countries. Demographic Research 7(7): 343–364.
Andersson, G. (2002b). Dissolution of unions in Europe: A comparative overview. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 27: 493–504.
Andersson, G. and Philipov, D. (2002). Life-table representations of family dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries: A project of descriptions of demographic behavior. Demographic Research 7(4): 67–144.
Badurashvili, I., Cheishvili, R., Kapanadze, E., Tsiklauri, S., and Sirbiladze, M. (2008). Gender relations in modern Georgian society. Tbilisi: United Nations Population Fund and Georgian Centre of Population Research.
Blossfeld, H.-P., Roßbach, H.-G., and von Maurice, J. (2011). Education as a lifelong process: The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Brillinger, D. (1986). The natural variability of vital rates and associated statistics. Biometrics 42(4): 693–734.
Chiang, C.L. (1984). The life table and its applications. Malabar: Krieger.
Dommermuth, L., Hart, R.K., Lappegård, T., Rønsen, M., and Wiik, K.A. (2015). Kunnskapsstatus om fruktbarhet og samliv i Norge [Knowledge overview on fertility and conjugal life in Norway]. Oslo: Statistics Norway (Statistics Norway reports 2015/31).
Duntava, A. and Billingsley, S. (2013). Changing life course regimes (CLiCR) data: Harmonization manual. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Demography unit (Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 2013: 17).
Esping-Andersen, G., Arpino, B., Baizán, P., Bellani, D., Castro-Martín, T., Creighton, M.J., van Damme, M., Delclòs, C.E., Domínguez, M., González, M.J., Luppi, F., Martín-García, T., Pessin, L., and Rutigliano, R. (2013). The fertility gap in Europe: Singularities of the Spanish case. Barcelona: ‘la Caixa’ Welfare Projects.
Fokkema, T., Kveder, A., Heikel, N., Emery, T., and Liefbroer, A. (2016). Generations and Gender Programme Wave 1 data collection: An overview and assessment of sampling and fieldwork methods, weighting procedures, and cross-sectional representativeness. Demographic Research 34(18): 499–524.
Hoem, J.M. (2011). The life table. In: Lovric, M. (ed.). International encyclopedia of statistical science. Heidelberg: Springer.
Hoem, J.M. and Kostova, D. (2008). Early traces of the second demographic transition in Bulgaria: A joint analysis of marital and nonmarital union formation. Population Studies 62(3): 1–13.
Jalovaara, M. and Andersson, G. (2017). Disparities in children’s family experiences by mother’s socioeconomic status: The case of Finland. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Demography unit (Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 2017: forthcoming).
Kostova, D. (2008). Union formation in times of social and economic change: Evidence from the Bulgarian and Russian GGS. [Doctoral dissertation]. Rostock: University of Rostock.
Kreyenfeld, M. and Bastin, S. (2016). Reliability of union histories in social science surveys: Blurred memory, deliberate misreporting, or true tales? Advances in Life Course Research 27: 30–42.
Kreyenfeld, M., Hornung, A., and Kubisch, K. (2013). The German Generations and Gender Survey: Some critical reflections on the validity of fertility histories. Comparative Population Studies 38(1): 3–28.
Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., and Kubisch, K. (2010). Harmonised histories manual for the preparation of comparative fertility and union histories. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR working paper WP 2010–011).
Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., de Wachter, D., and Neels, K. (2015). Quality of demographic data in GGS wave 1. Demographic Research 32(24): 723–774.
Vikat, A., Spéder, Z., Beets, G., Billari, F.C., Bühler, C., Désesquelles, A., Fokkema, T., Hoem, J.M., MacDonald, A., Neyer, G., Pailhé, A., Pinnelli, A., and Solaz, A. (2008). Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course. Demographic Research 17(14): 389–440.